Primary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method

Sponsor
Gangnam Severance Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02916199
Collaborator
(none)
207
7
2
13.8
29.6
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) as an initial procedure for biliary access in patients with biliary disease who are at increased risk for post-endoscopic retrograde endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (PEP) and to assess the incidence rate of complications including PEP between NKF and conventional cannulation methods.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: cannulation of ampulla of Vater
N/A

Detailed Description

Endoscopic retrograde endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract disease. However, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common adverse event following the procedure, ranging from 2% to 10% in nonselective cases, and it can cause substantial morbidity, mortality, or high medical costs. Recent advances in cannulation technique and accessories for biliary cannulation have contributed to reduce the incidence of PEP, but biliary cannulation can fail in 5% to 20% of cases of ERCP. Suprapapillary needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF), with or without large-diameter balloon dilation, has been used as a rescue method in cases of difficult biliary cannulation, and NKF was recommended as an initial approach to selective biliary cannulation in cases of repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulation.9 Moreover, difficult biliary cannulation is known to be a risk factor for PEP, and it has been reported that NKF is associated with a low risk of PEP. Thus, we hypothesized that NKF may reduce the risk of PEP in patients who are at increased risk for PEP.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
207 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Primary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Cannulation Method in Patients With High Risk of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 4, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 28, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 28, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Needle knife fistulotomy

Device: Needle knife fistulotomy Disease: Common bile duct stone, Malignant biliary stricture, Benign biliary stricture, Benign pancreatic disease, biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Indication: High risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis - Intervention: canulation of ampulla of Vater Intervention: canulation of ampulla of Vater

Device: cannulation of ampulla of Vater
Cannulation of ampulla of Vater is a procedure that a guide-wire is passed through ampulla using interventional devices

Active Comparator: conventional cannulation

Device: conventional canulation catheter Disease: Common bile duct stone, Malignant biliary stricture, Benign biliary stricture, Benign pancreatic disease, biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction Indication: High risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis - Intervention: canulation of ampulla of Vater Intervention: canulation of ampulla of Vater

Device: cannulation of ampulla of Vater
Cannulation of ampulla of Vater is a procedure that a guide-wire is passed through ampulla using interventional devices

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [1 week]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence rate of complications including bleeding, perforation and infection [1 week]

  2. Success rate of cannulation [1 day]

  3. Success rate of stone removal [1 day]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient who submitted a written informed consent for the this trial, and 18 ~ 90 years old

  • Patient who have naïve ampulla (no previous procedure was performed at ampulla)

  • Patient who is suspected to have biliary obstruction or biliary disease

  • Patient who is needed to have endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of biliary obstruction

  • Patient who have risks of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis among bellows (at least one more);

  1. suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

  2. young age (18~50 years)

  3. female

  4. normal common bile duct diameter (≤9mm)

  5. normal serum bilirubin level

  6. Obesity (body mass index > 30)

  7. Past history of acute pancreatitis

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient who is below 18 year old

  • Patient who is pregnant

  • Patient with mental retardation

  • Patient is sensitive to contrast agents

  • Patient who received sphincterotomy or pancreatobiliary operation previously

  • Patient who have ampulla of Vater cancer

  • Patient who have difficulty for approach to ampulla due to abdominal surgery including stomach cancer with Billroth II anastomosis

  • Patient who have pancreatic diseases as bellow (at least one more);

  1. Patient who have acute pancreatitis within 30days before enrollment

  2. Patient who have idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis

  3. Patient who have pancreatic divisum

  4. Patient who have obstructive chronic pancreatitis

  5. Patient who pancreatic cancer

  • Patients who have improper ampulla shape as bellows;
  1. Small ampulla (ampulla without oral protrusion)

  2. Flat or crooked or asymmetric ampulla

  3. Ampulla with peri-ampullary diverticulum type I or II

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHA Bundang Medical Center Seongnam Bundang-gu Korea, Republic of 13496
2 Gangnam Severance Hospital Seoul Gangnam-gu Korea, Republic of 06229
3 Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital Hwaseong-si Gyeonggi-do Korea, Republic of 18450
4 In Ha University Hospital Incheon Jung-gu Korea, Republic of 22332
5 Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital, Cheonan Cheonan Namdong-gu Korea, Republic of 31151
6 Gachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon Namdong-gu Korea, Republic of 21565
7 Pusan National University Hospital Busan-si Seo-gu Korea, Republic of 49241

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Gangnam Severance Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sung III Jang, Assistant professor, Gangnam Severance Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02916199
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 3-2017-0092
First Posted:
Sep 27, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Jan 30, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 30, 2019