Omadacycline vs. Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Sponsor
Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04779242
Collaborator
(none)
670
31
2
21.2
21.6
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
670 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 3b Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline IV/PO to Moxifloxacin IV/PO for Treating Adult Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 25, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Omadacycline

Omadacycline 100 mg IV; Omadacycline 300 mg PO (2 x 150 mg tablets); QD Dosing; 7-10 day duration.

Drug: Omadacycline
IV for injection, oral tablets
Other Names:
  • NUZYRA
  • Active Comparator: Moxifloxacin

    Moxifloxacin 400 mg IV; Moxifloxacin 400 mg tablets; QD Dosing; 7-10 day duration

    Drug: Moxifloxacin
    IV solution, oral tablets
    Other Names:
  • Avelox
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of participants with early clinical response in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population at the Early Clinical Response (ECR) visit [72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test article]

      Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2 CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in the other CABP symptoms. Response is determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in CABP symptoms, worsening of any CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event, or death.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of participants with the indicated investigator assessment of clinical response in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit [5 to 10 days after the last dose of test article]

      At the PTE Visit, the investigator indicates one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.

    2. Number of participants with the indicated investigator assessment of clinical response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CE-PTE) Population at the Post-Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit [5 to 10 days after the last dose of test article]

      At the PTE Visit, the investigator indicates one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male or female subjects, age 18 or older who have signed the informed consent form

    • Must have a qualifying community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

    • Subjects must not be pregnant or nursing at the time of enrollment

    • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia

    • Confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection

    • Evidence of significant immunological disease

    • Has a life expectancy of less than or equal to 3 months or any concomitant condition that is likely to interfere with evaluation of the response of the infection under study, determination of AEs, or completion of the expected course of treatment

    • Has a history of contraindications, hypersensitivity, or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or fluoroquinolone antibiotic

    • Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Site 208 Pernik Bulgaria
    2 Site 201 Pleven Bulgaria
    3 Site 206 Ruse Bulgaria
    4 Site 207 Sliven Bulgaria
    5 Site 202 Sofia Bulgaria
    6 Site 204 Sofia Bulgaria
    7 Site 205 Sofia Bulgaria
    8 Site 209 Sofia Bulgaria
    9 Site 302 Split Croatia
    10 Site 301 Zagreb Croatia
    11 Site 303 Zagreb Croatia
    12 Site 304 Zagreb Croatia
    13 Site 401 Tbilisi Georgia
    14 Site 402 Tbilisi Georgia
    15 Site 403 Tbilisi Georgia
    16 Site 404 Tbilisi Georgia
    17 Site 405 Tbilisi Georgia
    18 Site 406 Tbilisi Georgia
    19 Site 506 Moscow Russian Federation
    20 Site 507 Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
    21 Site 508 Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
    22 Site 509 Saint Petersburg Russian Federation
    23 Site 606 Dnipro Ukraine
    24 Site 602 Kharkiv Ukraine
    25 Site 611 Kharkiv Ukraine
    26 Site 603 Kyiv Ukraine
    27 Site 605 Kyiv Ukraine
    28 Site 607 Kyiv Ukraine
    29 Site 609 Kyiv Ukraine
    30 Site 608 Zaporizhia Ukraine
    31 Site 610 Zaporizhia Ukraine

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04779242
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PTK0796-CABP-19302
    First Posted:
    Mar 3, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    May 20, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 20, 2022