nCYT: Compare Fallopian Tube Cells Collected by Cytuity With Removed Ovarian/Tubal Tissue to Determine Presence of Malignancy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective, multi-center, non-randomized study to assess the ability of the Cytuity device to collect cell samples from the fallopian tube that can be evaluated for the presence or absence of malignancy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Cytological Samples for Fallopian Tube Involvement [At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy]
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the cytological samples collected from the fallopian tube in determining the presence or absence of malignancy for fallopian tube involvement as compared to the surgical histology results. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy for Fallopian Tube Involvement [At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy]
Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the ovaries and fallopian tube for fallopian tube involvement. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube.
- Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fallopian Tube [At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy]
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the fallopian tube.
- Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Ovaries [At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy]
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the ovaries for epithelial malignancies.
- Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy for Subject Level Analysis [At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy]
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology for fallopian tube involvement at the subject level. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subject is medically cleared for surgery
-
Subject is scheduled to undergo salpingo-oophorectomy or salpingectomy for a pelvic mass suspicious for malignancy
-
Subject must be 18 years of age
-
Subject must be able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Contraindication to hysteroscopy
-
Acute pelvic inflammatory disease
-
Active or recent lower pelvic infection
-
Pregnancy
-
Delivery or termination of a pregnancy in the past 6 weeks
-
Known tubal obstruction
-
Tubal ligation
-
Invasive carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium
-
Intolerance of anesthesia
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Scripps Clinic Medical Group | San Diego | California | United States | 92103 |
2 | Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center | San Francisco | California | United States | 94115 |
3 | Mayo Clinic | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32224 |
4 | Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | United States | 55905 |
5 | New York Presbyterian Hospital | New York | New York | United States | 10032 |
6 | Pennsylvania Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19107 |
7 | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37232 |
8 | Baylor Scott & White Research Institute | Fort Worth | Texas | United States | 76104 |
9 | University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | United States | 22908 |
10 | Swedish Health Services | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ted L Anderson, MD,PhD,FACOG, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- CLIN 0507
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Cytuity Cytological Evaluation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Those subjects enrolled in the study, with hysteroscope placed, ostia visualized, and adequate Cytuity cell sample collected. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 150 |
COMPLETED | 115 |
NOT COMPLETED | 35 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Cytuity Cytological Evaluation |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects from whom a signed informed consent form was obtained. |
Overall Participants | 150 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Age at Baseline |
53.9
(14.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
150
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
0.7%
|
Asian |
9
6%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
2
1.3%
|
Black or African American |
3
2%
|
White |
125
83.3%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
10
6.7%
|
Height (cm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm] |
162.8
(7.9)
|
Weight (kg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg] |
77.2
(21.3)
|
BMI (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2] |
29.1
(7.7)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Sensitivity and Specificity of Cytological Samples for Fallopian Tube Involvement |
---|---|
Description | Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the cytological samples collected from the fallopian tube in determining the presence or absence of malignancy for fallopian tube involvement as compared to the surgical histology results. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube. |
Time Frame | At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The number of Cytuity cell samples, not participants, was used for these endpoint analyses. |
Arm/Group Title | Sensitivity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Presence of Disease | Specificity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Absence of Disease |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The number of true positive Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true positives and the number of false negatives. | The number of true negative Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true negatives and the number of false positives. |
Measure Participants | NA | NA |
Measure Cytuity Cell Samples | 14 | 156 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples] |
.143
|
.959
|
Title | PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy for Fallopian Tube Involvement |
---|---|
Description | Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the ovaries and fallopian tube for fallopian tube involvement. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube. |
Time Frame | At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The number of Cytuity cell samples, not participants, was used for these endpoint analyses. |
Arm/Group Title | PPV - Proportion of True Positive Results for Fallopian Tube Involvement | NPV - Proportion of True Negative Results for Fallopian Tube Involvement | Diagnostic Accuracy - Proportion of Accurate Diagnoses |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The proportion of positive Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube found to have histology positive for malignancy and/or a corresponding ovary found to have histology positive for malignancy | The proportion of negative Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube found to have histology negative for malignancy and a corresponding ovary found to have histology negative for malignancy | The proportion of Cytuity cell sample results that conformed to the correct diagnosis as determined by the surgical histology results |
Measure Participants | NA | NA | NA |
Measure Cytuity Cell Samples | 9 | 161 | 170 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples] |
0.221
|
0.932
|
.894
|
Title | Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fallopian Tube |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the fallopian tube. |
Time Frame | At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The number of Cytuity cell samples, not participants, was used for these endpoint analyses. |
Arm/Group Title | Sensitivity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Presence of Disease | Specificity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Absence of Disease | PPV - Proportion of True Positive Results for Fallopian Tube Pathology | NPV - Proportion of True Negative Results for Fallopian Tube Pathology | Diagnostic Accuracy - Proportion of Accurate Diagnoses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The number of true positive Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true positive and the number of false negatives | The number of true negative Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true negatives and the number of false positives | The proportion of positive Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube also found to have histology positive for malignancy | The proportion of negative Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube also found to have histology negative for malignancy | The proportion of Cytuity cell sample results that conformed to the correct diagnosis as determined by the surgical histology results |
Measure Participants | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Measure Cytuity Cell Samples | 13 | 157 | 9 | 161 | 170 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples] |
.077
|
.952
|
.108
|
.932
|
.888
|
Title | Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Ovaries |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology of the ovaries for epithelial malignancies. |
Time Frame | At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The number of Cytuity cell samples, not participants, was used for these endpoint analyses. |
Arm/Group Title | Sensitivity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Presence of Disease | Specificity - Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples That Correctly Identify the Absence of Disease | PPV - Proportion of True Positive Results for Ovary Pathology for Epithelial Malignancy | NPV - Proportion of True Negatives for Ovary Pathology for Epithelial Malignancy | Diagnostic Accuracy - Proportion of Accurate Diagnoses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Number of true positive Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true positives and the number of false negatives | The number of true negative Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of true negatives and the number of false positives | The proportion of positive Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube adjacent to a corresponding ovary found to have histology positive for malignancy | The proportion of negative Cytuity cell samples that came from a fallopian tube adjacent to a corresponding ovary found to have histology truly negative for malignancy | The proportion of Cytuity cell sample results that conformed to the correct diagnosis as determined by the surgical histology results |
Measure Participants | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Measure Cytuity Cell Samples | 22 | 135 | 7 | 150 | 157 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Proportion of Cytuity Cell Samples] |
.091
|
.963
|
.281
|
.883
|
.851
|
Title | Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Diagnostic Accuracy for Subject Level Analysis |
---|---|
Description | Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value and Diagnostic Accuracy will be calculated for Cytuity as compared to surgical histology for fallopian tube involvement at the subject level. Fallopian tube involvement was defined as: 1. Malignant cells that originated in the fallopian tube, detected by the surgical histology results from the fallopian tube. 2. Malignant cells that have migrated to the fallopian tube, detected by surgical histology results of the ovaries or fallopian tube. |
Time Frame | At the time of the scheduled salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Sensitivity - Subjects in Which the Cytuity Correctly Identified the Presence of Disease | Specificity - Subjects in Which the Cytuity Correctly Identified the Absence of Disease | PPV - True Positive Results for Fallopian Tube Involvement on Subject Level | NPV - True Negative Results for Fallopian Tube Involvement on Subject Level | Diagnostic Accuracy - Subjects With Accurate Diagnoses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Number of subjects with true positive Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of subjects with true positives and the number of subjects with false negatives | The number of subjects with true negative Cytuity cell samples divided by the number of subjects with true negatives and the number of subjects with false positives | The number of subjects with a positive Cytuity cell sample and a fallopian tube and/or corresponding ovary with histology positive for malignancy | The number of subjects with a negative Cytuity cell sample and a fallopian tube and corresponding ovary with histology negative for malignancy | The number of subjects with a Cytuity cell sample result that conformed to the correct diagnosis on a subject level as determined by the surgical histology results |
Measure Participants | 10 | 64 | 8 | 66 | 74 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
2
1.3%
|
58
NaN
|
2
NaN
|
58
NaN
|
60
NaN
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events occurring from the time the hysteroscope entered the subject until study exit (defined as 24 hours post-Cytuity use or discharge, whichever occurs first). | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | Treated Subjects | |
Arm/Group Description | Subjects who signed the informed consent and had hysteroscope placement attempted | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Treated Subjects | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/130 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Treated Subjects | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/130 (2.3%) | |
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||
Anemia | 1/130 (0.8%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage | 1/130 (0.8%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||
Acute Kidney Injury | 1/130 (0.8%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Treated Subjects | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/130 (1.5%) | |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
Uterine Perforation | 1/130 (0.8%) | 1 |
Fallopian Tube perforation | 1/130 (0.8%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Trial Project Manager |
---|---|
Organization | Boston Scientific |
Phone | 612-209-9532 |
blake.hedstrom@bsci.com |
- CLIN 0507