Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures

Sponsor
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01645020
Collaborator
(none)
240
1
58
4.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Using partially absorbed meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery will involve fewer postoperative complications especially less pain caused by the mesh mass.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Weakness of pelvic floor support is the cause defects and damage to pelvic organs functioning and urinary control and it has a pretty common occurrence. It was suggested recently that the event is considered a hernia that requires mesh use, which reduces return rates following pelvic floor repair. Mesh use is known to cause complications and unwanted side effects, such as chronic pain, vaginal network exposure and infection. The degree of complications is related directly to the mass of the mesh, and that's why the absorbable meshes were developed.Two months after the surgery with absorbable mesh, the mass left in the patient's body is half of the initial mesh mass and according to our assumption this effect will minimize the extent and intensity of mesh complications compared with conventional ones.

    During the study we will examine medical records of women who have had surgery with pelvic floor reconstructive meshes. The cases will be divided according to the mesh type being used.

    A polypropylene mesh (single strand and tunneling wide) trade name "Prolift", and similar mesh that contains approximately half of the network mass after being dissolves in two months, a trade name "Prolift +" M.

    The number of participants in each group is 120 women. The post-operative follow-up examination will include three points in time. After a month, six months and a year later. In addition to questionnaires in order to quantify the degree of urinary disturbance, pain after surgery and sexual function.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    240 participants
    Observational Model:
    Case-Control
    Time Perspective:
    Cross-Sectional
    Official Title:
    Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures
    Study Start Date :
    Aug 1, 2008
    Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
    Jan 1, 2013
    Anticipated Study Completion Date :
    Jun 1, 2013

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

      Eligibility Criteria

      Criteria

      Ages Eligible for Study:
      N/A and Older
      Sexes Eligible for Study:
      Female
      Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
      No
      Inclusion Criteria:
      • Women who had pelvic floor repair surgery wit mesh used to the posterior vaginal wall.
      Exclusion Criteria:
      • Women with significant pre-operative pain

      • Women with collagen diseases

      • Women who underwent pelvic floor repair surgery with mesh to the anterior vaginal wall

      Contacts and Locations

      Locations

      Site City State Country Postal Code
      1 Western Galilee Hospital Nahariya Israel 22100

      Sponsors and Collaborators

      • Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya

      Investigators

      • Principal Investigator: M Neuman, MD,
      • Principal Investigator: Menahem Neuman,

      Study Documents (Full-Text)

      None provided.

      More Information

      Additional Information:

      Publications

      Responsible Party:
      Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
      ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
      NCT01645020
      Other Study ID Numbers:
      • 20
      First Posted:
      Jul 19, 2012
      Last Update Posted:
      Jul 19, 2012
      Last Verified:
      Jul 1, 2012
      Keywords provided by Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
      Additional relevant MeSH terms:

      Study Results

      No Results Posted as of Jul 19, 2012