FFR-DS: Comparison of Devices Evaluating Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Arteries

Sponsor
University Hospital, Caen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03052803
Collaborator
Acist Medical Systems (Industry), Abbott Medical Devices (Industry), Boston Scientific Corporation (Industry)
30
1
10
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare different devices available to measure fractional flow reserve (FFR) in coronary arteries.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Fractional flow reserve measure

Detailed Description

The decision to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is usually based on angiographic results alone. Angiography can be used for the visual evaluation of the inner diameter of a vessel. Visual evaluation is limited by inter-individual variability.

Fractional flow reserve provides a functional evaluation, by measuring the pressure decline caused by a vessel narrowing.

The original studies validating the use of FFR were conducted with only one device (St-Jude MedicalĀ®). Recently, new FFR devices have been commercialized but have not yet been compared.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Devices Evaluating Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Arteries : FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE - DEVICE STUDY (FFR-DS)
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Simultaneous FFR measure SJM and ACIST [Immediately]

    Correlation between simultaneous measures with St Jude medical FFR device and ACIST device

  2. Simultaneous FFR measure Boston Scientific and ACIST [Immediately]

    Correlation between simultaneous measures with BOSTON Scientific FFR device and ACIST device

  3. Simultaneous FFR measure Boston Scientific and SJM [Immediately]

    Correlation between simultaneous measures with BOSTON Scientific FFR device and St Jude Medical device

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. FFR SJM or Boston alone versus simultaneous with ACIST [Immediately]

    Correlation between SJM and Boston Scientific FFR measurements alone and simultaneous measure with ACIST

  2. Clinical concordance [Immediately]

    Concordance between FFR values >0.80 or <=0.80

  3. Drift of the signal [immediately]

    variation between the initial measure in the aorta (equalization) and final measure

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients hospitalized at Caen University Hospital for coronary angiography

  • Coronary stenosis needing FFR evaluation according to recommendations

  • More than 18 years old

  • Clinically stable

  • De novo coronary stenosis

  • Affiliated to social security

  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unstable patients defined by acute coronary syndrome < 7 days

  • Contre-indication to adenosine administration (asthma, allergy, high grade atrio-ventricular bloc without pace maker)

  • History of coronary artery bypass

  • intra-stent restenosis

  • Patient not capable of understanding the study

  • Informed consent not signed

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CAEN University Hospital Caen France

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Caen
  • Acist Medical Systems
  • Abbott Medical Devices
  • Boston Scientific Corporation

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Caen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03052803
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16-145
First Posted:
Feb 14, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jan 25, 2018
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Caen
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 25, 2018