Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization

Sponsor
Texas A&M University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05932017
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
20
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen.

The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.

Detailed Description

It is well known that tartar makes at-home oral hygiene care more difficult. The plaque and bacteria that accumulate on tartar are considered the primary factors contributing to gum disease. Conventional gum surgery is commonly performed using loupes (magnification glasses). The use of a videoscope, a handheld miniature camera, allows for greater visualization during surgery. While the debris on the root surface of teeth is not visible with loupes, it is easily observed when the root surface is visualized with the high magnification of the videoscope. The videoscope allows for up to 40x magnification to visualize underneath the gumline. The use of loupes and the videoscope are methods of visualization that are standard of care at the Texas A&M College of Dentistry.

This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes during surgery vs. surgery only using loupes. No aspect of this study is investigational, however, bacterial samples will be collected from the patients at multiple time points to assess outcomes. The collection of bacterial samples for research will be conducted through paper points and an oral rinse. These methods are well-established methods of data collection.

Data will be sent to OralDNA labs for analysis. A special contract is required between the school and the company as they will be paid for the services rendered.

Hypothesis: Does the use of the videoscope in conjunction with loupes, as compared to only using loupes for visualization during surgery, have a positive effect (i.e. reduced inflammation and active disease) on the outcomes of gum surgery.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization. A Pilot Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients receiving routine, pre-diagnosed, standard of care procedures.

Single cohort of patients receiving previously prescribed treatment. The only variable will be the modality of visualization utilized on each side of the mouth during the surgical procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Probing Depth (in millimeters) [baseline]

    The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  2. Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [baseline]

    The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  3. Bleeding on Probing (yes or no) [baseline]

    Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.

  4. Probing Depth (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]

    The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  5. Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]

    The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  6. Bleeding on Probing [These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]

    Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.

  7. Probing Depth (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]

    The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  8. Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]

    The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  9. Bleeding on Probing [These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]

    Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.

  10. Probing Depths (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

    The distance from the soft tissue (gingiva or alveolar mucosa) margin to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the probing depth is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  11. Clinical Attachment Level (in millimeters) [These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

    The distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the tip of the periodontal probe during usual periodontal diagnostic probing. The health of the attachment apparatus can affect the measurement. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms). The instrument used to measure the clinical attachment level is the periodontal probe. The periodontal is a calibrated probe used to measure the depth and determine the configuration of a periodontal pocket. (Definition from the American Academy of Periodontology Glossary of Periodontal Terms).

  12. Bleeding on Probing [These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

    Bleeding is observed or not observed around each of 6 surfaces for each individual tooth following the gentle probing into the gingiva to obtain the probing depth measurements (see definition of periodontal probing). Gingival bleeding indicates the presence of inflammation. Bleeding on probing is a standard of care observation/finding and clinical sign that indicates the presence of inflammation and the progression of periodontal disease.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Bacterial Species Identification [These will be collected at the initial visit]

    Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.

  2. Bacterial Species Identification [These will be collected at 3 months post-surgery.]

    Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.

  3. Bacterial Species Identification [These will be collected at 6 months post-surgery.]

    Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.

  4. Bacterial Species Identification [These will be collected at 1 year post-surgery.]

    Fluid from just underneath the subject's gums will be collected using a using a commercially available test (paper strip). The strip will be analyzed for bacteria. Minimal discomfort is associated with this procedure. The bacterial sampling is not routinely done in our clinic and considered to be a research only procedure. The test samples will be analyzed by OralDNA® Labs.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients that are treatment planned for open flap debridement in two or more quadrants

  • age >18 years old

  • Stage III periodontitis diagnosis

  • Probing depths ≥5mm with bleeding on probing

Exclusion Criteria:
  • systemic disease affecting bone metabolism

  • current smokers

  • diabetes

  • pregnant women

  • adults unable to consent

  • prisoners

  • previous or current bisphosphonate use

  • recent joint replacement requiring prophylactic antibiotics

  • teeth that necessitate and undergo osseous recontouring (shaping of the bone) will be excluded

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Texas A&M University School of Dentistry Dallas Texas United States 75246

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Texas A&M University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Parra Carrasquer, DDS, Texas A&M University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Texas A&M University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05932017
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB2022-1044
First Posted:
Jul 6, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jul 6, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Texas A&M University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 6, 2023