Comparison of Proprioception for HTO (High Tibial Osteotomy) and UKA (Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA), a common degenerative joint disease, affects a significant part of the world's population. Although it can hold all the compartments in the knee joint, isolated medial compartment involvement has been reported in about 85% of individuals diagnosed with KOA.
In the management of degenerative medial gonarthrosis; symptomatic relief and provide orthopaedic surgeons with the aim to slow down the progression of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) unikompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used. In recent years, HTO and UKA have been preferred more frequently among these surgical methods due to a number of advantages they provide for patients.
As a result of the orthopedic surgeries performed, interventions are made on bone and joint structures and problems may occur in the proprioceptive inputs provided by the body. In UKA, a new joint structure is created by changing the bone structure and removing the tibial plateau, while in HTO, the existing bone structure is preserved and a positional change is created. Thus, while it is expected that the proprioceptive response to be different between the two surgeries, no studies have been found in the literature on this issue. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries applied to individuals diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis on the proprioception of patients and to examine the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries on patients diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis.
H0: There is no difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis is considered.
H1: There is a difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis are considered.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Volunteer participants who have been diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and have varus deformity and have undergone surgery will be included. The surgical groups will be divided into two categories: HTO and UKA. Evaluations of the participants in terms of proprioception will be made. A voluntary consent form will be obtained from the participants.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| High Tibial Osteotomy patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent HTO surgery |
Other: Examination of propriception
application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist
|
| Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent UKA surgery |
Other: Examination of propriception
application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Romberg Test [Day 1]
The patient is asked to stand in an upright position with his feet open at shoulder level and his arms free at the sides. The patient, who does not receive any support, is asked to stand first with his eyes open and then with his eyes closed. While the patient is standing still, the time until the moment when his balance is disturbed is recorded.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Knee Society Score [Day 1]
The system is divided into a knee score, which assesses only the knee joint itself, and functional scores, which assesses the patient's ability to walk and climb stairs. As a result of the dual rating system, the problem of decreasing knee scores associated with patient weakness is eliminated.
- WOMAC [Day 1]
It is a scale that evaluates the disability associated with these conditions in hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. It consists of three parts: pain, stiffness and physical function. It contains a total of 24 substances.
- Single Leg Stance Test [Day 1]
It is used to evaluate static posture and balance control. The patient should stand unaided on one leg from the moment when the other foot leaves the floor until the time when the foot touches the floor again or the arms leave the hips.
- 5-times Sit to Stand Test [Day 1]
It is used to assess the functional strength of the lower extremities, transitional movements, balance and the risk of falls. Participants are evaluated by sitting on a back-supported chair five times and holding it for a while while getting up.
- change from baseline Gait Analyzer for walking speed at 8 weeks (m/sec) [Day 1]
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step duration, step length, cadence and symmetry.
- change from baseline Gait Analyzer for step time at 8 weeks (sec) [Day 1]
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step duration, step length, cadence and symmetry.
- change from baseline Gait Analyzer for step lenght at 8 weeks (m) [Day 1]
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step duration, step length, cadence and symmetry.
- change from baseline Gait Analyzer for cadance at 8 weeks (step/min) [Day 1]
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step duration, step length, cadence and symmetry.
- change from baseline Gait Analyzer for symmetry at 8 weeks (%) [Day 1]
It is a smartphone-based application for analyzing walking parameters in real time. It can measure walking speed, step duration, step length, cadence and symmetry.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Undergoing surgery at the age of 50-65
-
Performing unilateral UKA or HTO surgery
-
Moderate medial knee arthrosis on pre-op X-ray
-
Presence of mild varus deformity in the pre-op period
-
Should be BMI<30
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Regular exercise at least 3 days a week, 150 minutes, moderate intensity
-
Having undergone revision surgery
-
The presence of any other orthopedic problems/problems and surgery
-
Concomitant of a common rheumatological disease
-
Presence of neurological problems/problems
-
Having visual and auditory problems at a level that prevents communication
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Investigators
- Study Director: Ipek Yeldan Karagoz, Prof., Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Cao Z, Mai X, Wang J, Feng E, Huang Y. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
- Ghai S, Driller M, Ghai I. Effects of joint stabilizers on proprioception and stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 May;25:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 18.
- He M, Zhong X, Li Z, Shen K, Zeng W. Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 14;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01601-z.
- Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018 Nov;31(10):992-998. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
- Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 28;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9.
- Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009 Dec;16(6):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 22.
- F-473945936