Comparison of Robotic Arm-assisted PET/CT-guided Lung Biopsy With PET Fused CT- Fluoroscopy-guided Lung Biopsy

Sponsor
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05245630
Collaborator
(none)
59
1
19
3.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients with suspicious lung lesions were undertaken for PET/CT directed under CT fluoroscopy lung biopsy or robotic-assisted biopsy. The biopsy planning including patient positioning was done after F18-FDG PET/CT whole body or regional imaging of the patient. Written consent was obtained and the patient will be prepared for the biopsy. Lung biopsies were done using a semi-automatic biopsy gun under the imaging guidance (PET fused CT fluoroscopy) following aseptic precautions. Follow-up CT scans were taken post-biopsy. The time consumed for the procedure, radiation exposure to the interventionist, complications and diagnostic yield in both the arms were compared.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided biopsy
  • Procedure: PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy

Detailed Description

Patients with clinical suspicion of lung lesions were recruited for FDG PET/CT. Based on the PET/CT findings and clinical details a PET/CT guided biopsy was planned. The patients were assigned to the two arms. In the first arm, participants underwent a robotic-assisted biopsy. In the second arm, participants underwent PET/CT-directed CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy. The biopsy planning including patient positioning was done after F18-FDG PET/CT whole body or regional imaging of the patient. Written consent was obtained and the patient will be prepared for the biopsy. Lung biopsies were done using a semi-automatic biopsy gun under the imaging guidance (PET fused CT fluoroscopy) following aseptic precautions. Follow-up CT scans were taken post-biopsy. The time consumed for the procedure, radiation exposure to the interventionist, complications and diagnostic yield in both the arms were compared.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
59 participants
Observational Model:
Other
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Real-time Robotic Arm-assisted 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided Lung Biopsy Versus PET Fused CT- Fluoroscopy-guided Lung Biopsy: a Randomized Trial to Assess Diagnostic Performance and Patient Safety.
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided biopsy

In this group, participants were recruited for robotic-assisted PET/CT guided biopsy from the FDG avid lung lesions. biopsies were done using an automated robotic arm (MAXIO-EX, Perfint healthcare Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India) to guide the needle for biopsy. It is a robotic arm with a four-ax guide arm and a planning console. Pre-interventional fused PET/CT images from Biograph mCT 16 scanner were sent via LAN cable to the device (MAXIO-EX) console.

Procedure: Robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided biopsy
After preparing the participant for the procedure, the participant was positioned on the PET/CT table with the immobilizer. An automated robotic arm (MAXIO-EX, Perfint healthcare Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India) was used to guide the needle for biopsy. Co-axial 18 G biopsy needle (BARD Biopsy disposable coaxial biopsy needle pack, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Arizona, USA) was inserted according to the orientation planned by the robotic biopsy device. After the location is ensured, the trocar stylet is removed from the coaxial cannula and specimens were retrieved using a semiautomated biopsy gun. A repeat CT chest was acquired two hours after the procedure to rule out post-procedural complications. Complications during the procedure were noted, and immediate management was done.

Procedure: PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy
CT fluoroscopy was used to place the biopsy needle to the FDG avid lung lesion

PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy

In this group, participants were recruited for PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy from the FDG avid lung lesions. A biopsy needle was placed to the target lesion on PET/CT under CT fluoroscopy

Procedure: Robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided biopsy
After preparing the participant for the procedure, the participant was positioned on the PET/CT table with the immobilizer. An automated robotic arm (MAXIO-EX, Perfint healthcare Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India) was used to guide the needle for biopsy. Co-axial 18 G biopsy needle (BARD Biopsy disposable coaxial biopsy needle pack, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., Arizona, USA) was inserted according to the orientation planned by the robotic biopsy device. After the location is ensured, the trocar stylet is removed from the coaxial cannula and specimens were retrieved using a semiautomated biopsy gun. A repeat CT chest was acquired two hours after the procedure to rule out post-procedural complications. Complications during the procedure were noted, and immediate management was done.

Procedure: PET fused CT-Fluoroscopy guided biopsy
CT fluoroscopy was used to place the biopsy needle to the FDG avid lung lesion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. To compare the accuracy ( in percentage) of trans-thoracic percutaneous PET fused CT-fluoroscopy guided lung biopsy and automated robotic arm assisted PET/CT guided lung biopsy [three months]

    Histology reports of the biopsies were recorded and the mutation analysis, Adequacy of the sample was decided by the pathologist who received the sample and when inadequate, we were notified accordingly by the Department of Pathology. The histopathological results were analyzed. True positive, True negative False-positive and False-negative were calculated for both the groups. The diagnostic accuracy in percentage for both arms will be calculated and compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. To compare the radiation exposure and complication in the both arms [three months]

    Procedure related complications and radiation exposure to the participants and interventionist were noted in the both arms.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age >/= 18 years

  2. FDG avid amenable lung lesion

  3. INR < 1.2 and Platelet counts > 80,000/mm3

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Participants with pre-existing bleeding diathesis like hemophilia, coagulopathy defined by INR ≥ 1.2 and Platelet counts ≤ 80,000/mm3

  2. Participants who refuse to provide the written informed consent

  3. Signs of hypoperfusion like cyanosis, hypotension etc.

  4. Presence of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 95% -measured in a pulse oximeter)

  5. Pregnant/Lactating females participants

  6. Non-cooperative participants

  7. Inaccessible lesions (based on the decision made on pre-biopsy planning)

  8. CoVID-19 positive participants

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, PGIMER Chandigarh Chandīgarh India 160012

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rajender Kumar, Associate Professor, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05245630
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NK/6832/MD/594
First Posted:
Feb 18, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Feb 18, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 18, 2022