Comparison of Skin - Epidural and Intervertebral Distances in Sitting and Rider Position
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Epidural anesthesia/analgesia can be performed under various positions. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the intervertebral and skin-epidural distances in "the sitting" and "rider" positions with the help of ultrasonography
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Complication rates in epidural intervention, which can be used for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia are higher than peripheral blocks, especially in open abdominal surgeries. In epidural intervention, correct determination of patient position, puncture site and the distance from the skin to the epidural area (skin - epidural distance) is very important in terms of preventing complications. The location of the point where the epidural intervention will be made is aimed to be determined using the anatomical surface markings in the blind technique. However, anatomical surface markings are unreliable in pregnant or obese patients and patients with anatomical variants. The use of pre-procedure ultrasonography allows obtaining information such as midline and baseline determination, skin-epidural distance measurement, increasing the success of the intervention.
The most preferred positions for epidural interventions are sitting and lateral decubitus positions. Many modifications of these positions also exist. The rider position is used in a few centers in and out of Turkey, but there is only one clinical study related to the position.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Intervertebral distance [5 minutes]
Comparison of intervertebral distance measurements with the help of ultrasonography in the thoracic and lumbar regions in sitting and rider positions.
- Skin - epidural distance [5 minutes]
Comparison of skin - epidural distance measurements with the help of ultrasonography in the thoracic and lumbar regions in sitting and rider positions.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
• ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Prior spinal surgery
-
Spinal deformity
-
Recent spinal and head trauma
-
Infection in the area to be measured
-
Severe hypovolemia
-
Severe edema
-
severe abdominal distention
-
Severe pain
-
Difficulty in cooperation
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa | Istanbul | Fatih | Turkey | 34098 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Investigators
- Study Chair: Safak Emre Erbabacan, MD, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
- Study Director: Fatis Altındas, Prof., Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
- Study Director: Cigdem Akyol Beyoglu, Assoc. Prof., Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
- Study Director: Aylin Nizamoglu, Assoc. Prof., Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Khemka R, Rastogi S, Desai N, Chakraborty A, Sinha S. Comparison of ultrasound imaging in transverse median and parasagittal oblique planes for thoracic epidurals: A pilot study. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;60(6):377-81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.183398.
- Korkmaz Toker M, Altiparmak B, Uysal AI, Turan M, Gumus Demirbilek S. Rider sitting position widens lumbar intervertebral distance: a prospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr 19:S0104-0014(21)00140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.010. Online ahead of print.
- Sahin T, Balaban O, Sahin L, Solak M, Toker K. A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy. J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1726-1. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
- Sahin T, Balaban O. Lumbar Ultrasonography for Obstetric Neuraxial Blocks: Sonoanatomy and Literature Review. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018 Aug;46(4):257-267. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.90277. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
- Soltani Mohammadi S, Hassani M, Marashi SM. Comparing the squatting position and traditional sitting position for ease of spinal needle placement: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Apr 5;4(2):e13969. doi: 10.5812/aapm.13969. eCollection 2014 May.
- Soltani Mohammadi S, Piri M, Khajehnasiri A. Comparing Three Different Modified Sitting Positions for Ease of Spinal Needle Insertion in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Oct 23;7(5):e55932. doi: 10.5812/aapm.55932. eCollection 2017 Oct.
- 367794