Comparison of Verbal Rating Scale and Numerical Rating Scale in Post Anesthesia Care Unit

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03768102
Collaborator
(none)
200
1
8.6
23.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In the postanesthetic care unit(PACU), patients who are recovering from anesthesia are not easy to communicate with. Accordingly, accurate evaluation of acute surgical pain is difficult for PACU patients in spite of severe postoperative pain. Therefore, pain evaluation is clinically important and challenging in PACU. The pain evaluation tool should be simple and easy to understand for accurate assessment. Among the most commonly used pain assessment methods are numerical rating scale(NRS), visual analogue scale(VAS) and verbal rating scale(VRS). These three methods have proved valid for clinical situations in many studies. VRS appears to be easier to understand than the other two methods for patients in PACU. The purpose of this study is to compare NRS and VRS in PACU patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    200 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Comparative Study of Verbal Rating Scale and Numerical Rating Scale in Post Anesthesia Care Unit
    Actual Study Start Date :
    Dec 12, 2018
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Aug 30, 2019
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Aug 30, 2019

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale [5 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)". 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

    2. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale [20 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)" 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

    3. Pain measurement by the numerical rating scale [40 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to rate their pain : "Rate your pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain)" 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

    4. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale [5 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

    5. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale [20 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

    6. Pain measurement by the verbal rating scale [40 minutes after transferred into the postanesthesia care unit]

      Patients verbally requested to answer which of the four categories you belong to : no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain

    7. nonresponse rate of the numerical rating scale [1 year]

      the rate of assessment failures among the total number of assessment

    8. nonresponse rate of the verbal rating scale [1 year]

      the rate of assessment failures among the total number of assessment

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adult patients who underwent general anesthesia

    • The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification system : class 1, 2, 3

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • The American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classification system : class 4, 5

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Jin-Tae Kim Seoul Select Korea, Republic of 110-744

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Seoul National University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jin-Tae Kim, Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Jin-Tae Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03768102
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • SNUMR2-3
    First Posted:
    Dec 7, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 22, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 22, 2020