Quantifying the Influence of Expert Modeling
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the effects of various types of simulation preparation methods on novice nurses' competence and self-efficacy. Participants will be recruited from an academic course (N424 Integrated Practicum). Participants will be randomized to three intervention groups (i.e. expert modeling video, voice over PowerPoint, and traditional readings). All participants will complete self-efficacy surveys and two simulations. During simulation, participants will be scored based on their competence according to a performance rubric. The hypothesis is that participants in the expert modeling group will demonstrate more change in competence and report more change in self-efficacy scores than participants in other groups.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Investigators will compare self-confidence and competence scores between the three groups after the pre-test and posttest simulations. The self-efficacy survey is an 7-item scale that involves participants rating their self-efficacy about providing care for multiple patients. Participants rate their self-efficacy on a 1 to 5 (not confident to very confident scale). The survey takes 5 minutes to complete. The self-efficacy survey has been used in many simulation research studies previously with novice nurses. Competence will be measured with a rater-observation measure which has previously been used in simulation research.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Expert Modeling Participants will have access to 70 minutes of expert modeling videos available over 5 weeks on an online learning management system. The investigator will be the expert model in the videos. Expert modeling videos will address content related to seven concepts: Taking report with a graphic organizer worksheet, prioritizing patient care, delegating to unlicensed assistive personnel, safety checks in patient rooms, focused physical assessments, safe medication administration, and using a standardized healthcare provider communication tool on the telephone. |
Other: Common readings and educational handouts
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities. There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
Other: Expert Modeling
70 minutes of expert modeling videos
|
Active Comparator: Voice Over PowerPoint Participants will have access to 60 minutes of voice over PowerPoint slides, available over 5 weeks on an online learning management system, specifically to match exposure and content with the expert modeling video group. The script for PowerPoint will contain content related to the aforementioned seven concepts. There will be static photos, but no expert modeling videos, on PowerPoint slides. The investigator will narrate the voice over PowerPoint. |
Other: Common readings and educational handouts
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities. There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
Other: Voice Over Power Point
60 minutes of Voice Over PowerPoint presentations
|
Placebo Comparator: Reading Participants will have access to articles, policies, and procedures on an online learning management system. The estimated time required for participants to review these materials is 45 minutes |
Other: Common readings and educational handouts
Participants in all groups have common readings related to policies for nursing care in acute care facilities. There will be additional handouts related to performing safety checks and a focused physical assessment.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument [Change from baseline on Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument at 5 weeks]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- National League for Nursing Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale [Change from baseline on NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence with Learning scale at 5 weeks]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Enrolled in capstone clinical course
-
Oregon Consortium for Nursing Education curriculum
-
Ashland, OR
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oregon Health & Science University, School of Nursing | Ashland | Oregon | United States | 97520 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Oregon Health and Science University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ashley Franklin, Oregon Health and Science University
- Study Chair: Christopher S Lee, PhD, Oregon Health and Science University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- MPtSim-Ashland