IGNITE1: Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h Eravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligram per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Eravacycline treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached. |
Drug: Eravacycline
Other Names:
Drug: Placebo
Administered IV to maintain the blind.
|
Active Comparator: Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 gram (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Ertapenem treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached. |
Drug: Ertapenem
Other Names:
Drug: Placebo
Administered IV to maintain the blind.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population [TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug]
Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit [TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose]
Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.
- Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit [TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose]
Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Male or female participant hospitalized for cIAI
-
At least 18 years of age (and not over 65 years of age for participant in India)
-
Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response
-
Abdominal pain or flank pain (with or without rebound tenderness), or pain caused by cIAI that is referred to another anatomic area
-
Able to provide informed consent
-
If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 90 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
-
If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: either will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
-
Renal failure
-
Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
-
Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity (requiring anti-retroviral therapy or with CD4 count <300), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, >40 mg prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
-
History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines, carbapenems, β-lactam antibiotics or to excipients contained in the study drug formulations
-
Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
-
Known or suspected current Central Nervous System disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold
-
Previously received eravacycline in a clinical trial
-
Antibiotic-related exclusions:
-
Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for cIAI for a continuous duration of >24 hours during the 72-hour preceding enrollment (however, participants with documented cIAI [that is, known baseline pathogen] who have received at least 72 hours of antibiotic therapy and are considered treatment failures may be enrolled. Treatment failure is defined as persistent fever and/or clinical symptoms; or the development of a new intra-abdominal abscess after ≥72 hours of antibiotic therapy), or
-
Receipt of ertapenem or any other carbapenem, or tigecycline for the current infection or
-
Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug
-
Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent
-
Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess
-
The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days
-
Systemic malignancy that required chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy or antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Florence | Alabama | United States | ||
2 | Mobile | Alabama | United States | ||
3 | Glendale | California | United States | ||
4 | La Mesa | California | United States | ||
5 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
6 | Torrance | California | United States | ||
7 | Aurora | Illinois | United States | ||
8 | Carmel | Indiana | United States | ||
9 | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | ||
10 | Springfield | Massachusetts | United States | ||
11 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | ||
12 | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | ||
13 | Camden | New Jersey | United States | ||
14 | Teaneck | New Jersey | United States | ||
15 | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | ||
16 | Columbus | Ohio | United States | ||
17 | Weston | Ohio | United States | ||
18 | Houston | Texas | United States | ||
19 | Seattle | Washington | United States | ||
20 | Cordoba | Argentina | |||
21 | Pleven | Bulgaria | |||
22 | Plovdiv | Bulgaria | |||
23 | Rousse | Bulgaria | |||
24 | Sofia | Bulgaria | |||
25 | Varna | Bulgaria | |||
26 | Brno | Czechia | |||
27 | Kladno | Czechia | |||
28 | Melnik | Czechia | |||
29 | Olomouc | Czechia | |||
30 | Prague | Czechia | |||
31 | Usti nad Labem | Czechia | |||
32 | Kohtla-Jarve | Estonia | |||
33 | Tallinn | Estonia | |||
34 | Tartu | Estonia | |||
35 | Paris | France | |||
36 | Heidelberg | Germany | |||
37 | Luebeck | Germany | |||
38 | Magdeburg | Germany | |||
39 | Daugavpils | Latvia | |||
40 | Liepaja | Latvia | |||
41 | Riga | Latvia | |||
42 | Kaunas | Lithuania | |||
43 | Klaipeda | Lithuania | |||
44 | Siauliai | Lithuania | |||
45 | Vilnius | Lithuania | |||
46 | Bucharest | Romania | |||
47 | Cluj-Napoca | Romania | |||
48 | Craiova | Romania | |||
49 | Timisoara | Romania | |||
50 | Kaluga | Russian Federation | |||
51 | Kemerovo | Russian Federation | |||
52 | Moscow | Russian Federation | |||
53 | Nizhny Novgorod | Russian Federation | |||
54 | Smolensk | Russian Federation | |||
55 | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | |||
56 | Tomsk | Russian Federation | |||
57 | Volgograd | Russian Federation | |||
58 | Vsevolozhsk | Russian Federation | |||
59 | Benoni | South Africa | |||
60 | Johannesburg | South Africa | |||
61 | Pretoria | South Africa | |||
62 | Worcester | South Africa | |||
63 | Dnipropetrovsk | Ukraine | |||
64 | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine | |||
65 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | |||
66 | Kyiv | Ukraine | |||
67 | Odesa | Ukraine | |||
68 | Uzhhorod | Ukraine | |||
69 | Zaporizhia | Ukraine |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Patrick T Horn, MD, PhD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- TP-434-008
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 grams (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 270 | 271 |
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug | 270 | 268 |
COMPLETED | 246 | 255 |
NOT COMPLETED | 24 | 16 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 270 | 271 | 541 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
54.8
(16.92)
|
54.8
(16.09)
|
54.8
(16.49)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
114
42.2%
|
108
39.9%
|
222
41%
|
Male |
156
57.8%
|
163
60.1%
|
319
59%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
8
3%
|
9
3.3%
|
17
3.1%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
261
96.7%
|
262
96.7%
|
523
96.7%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||
White |
263
97.4%
|
260
95.9%
|
523
96.7%
|
Black or African American |
1
0.4%
|
3
1.1%
|
4
0.7%
|
Asian |
1
0.4%
|
3
1.1%
|
4
0.7%
|
Other Race |
4
1.5%
|
5
1.8%
|
9
1.7%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
0.4%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Russian Federation |
28
10.4%
|
24
8.9%
|
52
9.6%
|
Romania |
42
15.6%
|
42
15.5%
|
84
15.5%
|
United States |
18
6.7%
|
20
7.4%
|
38
7%
|
Ukraine |
38
14.1%
|
38
14%
|
76
14%
|
Czech Republic |
14
5.2%
|
17
6.3%
|
31
5.7%
|
Latvia |
25
9.3%
|
23
8.5%
|
48
8.9%
|
South Africa |
0
0%
|
1
0.4%
|
1
0.2%
|
Bulgaria |
45
16.7%
|
44
16.2%
|
89
16.5%
|
Lithuania |
26
9.6%
|
26
9.6%
|
52
9.6%
|
Germany |
2
0.7%
|
2
0.7%
|
4
0.7%
|
Estonia |
32
11.9%
|
34
12.5%
|
66
12.2%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population |
---|---|
Description | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. |
Time Frame | TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized participants who had baseline bacterial pathogens that cause cIAI and against at least one of which the investigational drug has in vitro antibacterial activity (micro-ITT population). |
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
Measure Participants | 220 | 226 |
Cure |
191
70.7%
|
198
73.1%
|
Failure |
19
7%
|
11
4.1%
|
Indeterminate |
10
3.7%
|
17
6.3%
|
Title | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit |
---|---|
Description | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. |
Time Frame | TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (MITT population). |
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
Measure Participants | 270 | 268 |
Cure |
235
87%
|
238
87.8%
|
Failure |
19
7%
|
15
5.5%
|
Indeterminate |
16
5.9%
|
15
5.5%
|
Title | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit |
---|---|
Description | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. |
Time Frame | TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All randomized participants who had no major protocol deviations (CE population). |
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
Measure Participants | 239 | 238 |
Cure |
222
82.2%
|
225
83%
|
Failure |
17
6.3%
|
13
4.8%
|
Indeterminate |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | ||
Arm/Group Description | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 17/270 (6.3%) | 16/268 (6%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Atrial fibrillation | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Cardiopulmonary failure | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Pulseless electrical activity | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Supraventricular tachycardia | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal compartment syndrome | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Colonic fistula | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Diverticular perforation | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage | 1/270 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Ileus | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Intestinal fistula | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Oesophageal fistula | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pancreatitis necrotising | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Multi-organ failure | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Abdominal abscess | 1/270 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Empyema | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Haematoma infection | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Liver abscess | 1/270 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Peritoneal abscess | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Peritonitis | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia | 2/270 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Sepsis | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Septic shock | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Abdominal wound dehiscence | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal stoma complication | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Splenic rupture | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Wound dehiscence | 2/270 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Wound evisceration | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Acute respiratory failure | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary artery thrombosis | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 0/270 (0%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Respiratory disorder | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Respiratory failure | 0/270 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Surgical and medical procedures | ||||
Biliary drainage | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Deep vein thrombosis | 1/270 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 43/270 (15.9%) | 28/268 (10.4%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 7/270 (2.6%) | 9/268 (3.4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 22/270 (8.1%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Vomiting | 11/270 (4.1%) | 9/268 (3.4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Pyrexia | 6/270 (2.2%) | 8/268 (3%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Phlebitis | 8/270 (3%) | 1/268 (0.4%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
At least 60 days prior to submitting or presenting a manuscript, poster, presentation, abstract or other materials relating to the Trial, the PI shall provide to Sponsor all such manuscripts and materials, and Sponsor shall have 60 days to review and comment. If requested, the PI shall remove confidential information prior to submitting or presenting the materials, and shall delay publication or presentation for up to 90 days to allow Sponsor to protect its interests in any such materials.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Chief Development Officer |
---|---|
Organization | La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company |
Phone | +1.617.715.3600 |
ljpcregulatory@ljpc.com |
- TP-434-008