Implant Supported Single Crowns With Different Retention Modes
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the inflammatory response mediated by MMP-8 (Matrix metalloproteinase-8 ) level in peri-implant sulcus fluid adjacent to screw-retained, cemented or using the Acuris-system fixed single implant crowns as well as changing of the marginal bone level within the first year after implant restoration. Furthermore periodontal parameters, patient satisfaction and possible occurring biological or technical complications will be evaluated.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
After giving their written consent volunteers will be screened and eligible subjects will be randomized to three different groups. In group 1 Acuris® is used as fixation type; in group 2 screw retention, and in group 3 cementation is used. After 3 months of submerged healing the dental implants will be restored with all ceramic single implant crowns, fixed by using the randomized fixation mode. Follow-up visits till one year after implant restoration will be performed. At least 11 study visits during 16 months will be conducted.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: conometric concept (Acuris system) single implant crown retention using friction only |
Other: conometric concept Acuris system
implant crown retention type using friction only
|
Active Comparator: screw retention screw retained implant Crown fixation |
Other: screw retention
screw retained implant crown
|
Active Comparator: cementation cement retained implant Crown fixation |
Other: cementation
cement retained implant crown
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change of marginal bone level [at baseline, 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
assessed by single tooth x-ray; in mm
- Change of matrix metalloproteinase 8 level [4 months after implant placement, 3, 6 and 12 months after integration of the implant crown]
biomarker for Inflammation of peri-implant disease; in ng/ml
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change of probing depth (PD) [at baseline, 4, 7, 10, 16 months after implantation]
using a periodontal probe; in mm
- Number of occurrences of chipping [measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
visual check
- soft tissue maintenance [measured 4 months after implant placement and 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
Papilla Index (Jemt T, 1997), the index ranges from 0 to 4, while 2 and 3 indicate physiological outcome
- technician satisfaction [measured 12 months after restoration]
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
- dentist satisfaction [measured 12 months after restoration]
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
- patient satisfaction [measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months after restoration]
evaluated using OHIP-G 14 questionnaire. The following dimensions are captured by the OHIP-G 14: functional Limitation (e.g., "pronouncing any words because of problems with your teeth, mouth, dentures, or jaw?") and physical Pain (e.g., "Have you had painful aching in your mouth"). 14 questions are raised, which are answered using a rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
- Plaque Index (PI) [at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation]
in percent
- Bleeding on Probing (BOP) [at baseline, 4, 7, 10 and 16 months after implantation]
in percent
- Patient satisfaction concerning the implant crown [measured 12 months after restoration]
evaluated using an individual questionnaire
- Number of occurrences of fractures [measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
visual check
- Number of occurrences of screw loosening [measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
visual check
- Number of occurrences of crown loosening [measured after integration of implant crown 3, 6 and 12 months after restoration]
visual check
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
capability of giving an informed consent
-
good health as defined by the subjects medical history (no contraindications as described in the exclusion criteria below)
-
age 18 to 99 years
-
Good periodontal status: BOP < 20%, PI < 30%, no PD > 4mm
-
No heavy smokers (< 10 cigarettes/day)
-
at least 1 missing tooth in the premolar and molar region (with at least a mesial neighboring tooth/implant showing adequate hard- and soft tissue situation without the need of crestal hard- or soft tissue augmentation) either in the maxilla or in the mandible requiring implant therapy for reconstruction, requiring sinus floor augmentation or not.
Exclusion Criteria
-
Insufficient bone volume for implant placement requiring GBR (guided bone regeneration) procedure in crestal area.
-
Heavy Smokers (>10 cigarettes/day)
-
Medication with a contraindication for implant therapy (especially antiresorptive therapy, ongoing or recently completed local radiotherapy, systematic diseases, ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, functional disorders like Bruxism).
-
Skeletal immaturity.
-
Any active malignancy or ongoing treatment for malignancy.
-
An active infection (e.g. caries, gingivitis, periodontitis) at or in the neighboring area of the operative site.
-
Pregnancy
-
unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits for a period of at least 16 months
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Medical University of Graz, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Division of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics | Graz | Austria | 8010 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Medical University of Graz
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Norbert Jakse, UnivProfDDr, Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- DeCarlo AA, Grenett HE, Harber GJ, Windsor LJ, Bodden MK, Birkedal-Hansen B, Birkedal-Hansen H. Induction of matrix metalloproteinases and a collagen-degrading phenotype in fibroblasts and epithelial cells by secreted Porphyromonas gingivalis proteinase. J Periodontal Res. 1998 Oct;33(7):408-20.
- Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Aug;17(4):326-33.
- Kraus RD, Epprecht A, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I, Thoma DS. Cemented vs screw-retained zirconia-based single implant reconstructions: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):578-585. doi: 10.1111/cid.12735. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
- Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, Brånemark PI, Eriksson B, Rockler B, Lindvall AM, Yoneyama T. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (II) A cross-sectional retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb;15(1):53-61.
- Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Nov 14. Review.
- Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Wegscheider W, Keil C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Bratschko RO. Retrospective analysis of Frialit-2 implants in the augmented sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):255-67.
- Ma J, Kitti U, Teronen O, Sorsa T, Husa V, Laine P, Rönkä H, Salo T, Lindqvist C, Konttinen YT. Collagenases in different categories of peri-implant vertical bone loss. J Dent Res. 2000 Nov;79(11):1870-3.
- Meissen R, Mintcheva M, Netuschil L. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in peri-implant sulcus fluid adjacent to titanium and zirconium nitride surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):91-5. doi: 10.11607/prd.1504.
- Penarrocha-Oltra D, Monreal-Bello A, Penarrocha-Diago M, Alonso-Perez-Barquero J, Botticelli D, Canullo L. Microbial Colonization of the Peri-Implant Sulcus and Implant Connection of Implants Restored With Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Superstructures: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Periodontol. 2016 Sep;87(9):1002-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160017. Epub 2016 May 6.
- Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:163-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x. Review.
- Sorsa T, Hernández M, Leppilahti J, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Mäntylä P. Detection of gingival crevicular fluid MMP-8 levels with different laboratory and chair-side methods. Oral Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01603.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
- Sorsa T, Tjäderhane L, Konttinen YT, Lauhio A, Salo T, Lee HM, Golub LM, Brown DL, Mäntylä P. Matrix metalloproteinases: contribution to pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of periodontal inflammation. Ann Med. 2006;38(5):306-21. Review.
- Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81.
- Thoma DS, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Gil A, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical study of veneered zirconia abutments for single implant crowns: Clinical, histological, and microbiological outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):988-996. doi: 10.1111/cid.12674. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
- Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Maslova N, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):771-8. doi: 10.1111/cid.12170. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
- 32-578 ex 19/20