Dosing Iodinated Contrast Media According to Lean vs. Total Body Weight

Sponsor
Nova Scotia Health Authority (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03415997
Collaborator
(none)
239
1
2
8.6
27.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of dosing iodinated contrast media according to a patient's total body weight vs. lean body weight. Participants will be randomized into 2 groups based on contrast dosing technique, and solid organ enhancement at uniphasic abdominal CT will be measured.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
239 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Dosing Iodinated Contrast Media According to Lean vs. Total Body Weight at Abdominal CT: a North American Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 21, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 9, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 9, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Total Body Weight

Drug: Iohexol
Iodinated contrast media

Active Comparator: Lean Body Weight

Drug: Iohexol
Iodinated contrast media

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean hepatic enhancement (MHE): difference in liver attenuation on computed tomography images acquired before and after administration of contrast (in portal venous phase), as measured in Hounsfield units (HU) [1 hour]

    Images of the liver will be obtained before and after administration of iodinated contrast media. Regions of interest will be drawn on these pre- and post- contrast computed tomography (CT) images of the liver. The average attenuation before and after contrast administration will be calculated. The mean hepatic enhancement (MHE) will be calculated as the average attenuation post-contrast minus the average attenuation pre-contrast. This will provide a measure of liver enhancement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Standard deviation in mean hepatic enhancement (sigma MHE): standard deviation in the difference in liver attenuation on CT acquired before and after administration of contrast (in portal venous phase), as measured in Hounsfield units (HU) [1 hour]

    Images of the liver will be obtained before and after administration of iodinated contrast media. Regions of interest will be drawn on these pre- and post- contrast computed tomography images of the liver. The average attenuation before and after contrast administration will be calculated. The mean hepatic enhancement (MHE) will be calculated as the average attenuation post-contrast minus the average attenuation pre-contrast. The standard deviation in MHE will provide a measure of inter-patient variability.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • outpatients only

  • patients scanned on modern Siemens scanners at our institution

Exclusion Criteria:
  • self-reported history of chronic kidney, heart or liver disease

  • allergy to iodinated contrast

  • acute illness

  • outside maximum threshold limit for weight-based contrast dosing

  • pregnancy

  • image degradation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada B3H 2Y9

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nova Scotia Health Authority

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreu Costa, Md FRCPC, Nova Scotia Health Authority

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Andreu Costa, Principal Investigator; Section Head of Abdominal Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Assistant Professor, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia Health Authority
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03415997
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NSHA REB 1023119
First Posted:
Jan 30, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jan 31, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 31, 2019