ESOS (Endoscopic Saphenous Harvesting With an Open CO2 System) Trial

Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01121341
Collaborator
LivaNova (Industry)
200
1
2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The ESOS (Endoscopic Saphenous harvesting with an Open CO2 System) trial is a prospective randomized trial for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery to compare endoscopic open CO2 harvesting system versus conventional vein harvesting.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Vein harvesting
Phase 4

Detailed Description

The ESOS (Endoscopic Saphenous harvesting with an Open CO2 System) trial is a prospective randomized trial for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery to compare and to test improvement in wound healing, quality of life, safety/efficacy, cost-effectiveness, short and long-term outcomes and vein-graft patency after endoscopic open CO2 harvesting system versus conventional vein harvesting.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
ESOS (Endoscopic Saphenous Harvesting With an Open CO2 System) Trial: a Prospective Randomized Trial for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery.
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2010
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: EVOH

Procedure: Endoscopic vein with an open CO2 system harvesting

Procedure: Vein harvesting
Endoscopic versus conventional vein harvesting

Active Comparator: OVH

Procedure: Conventional vein harvesting

Procedure: Vein harvesting
Endoscopic versus conventional vein harvesting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Morbidity hypothesis [six weeks]

    When compared to Conventional vein-graft harvesting (CVH) in CABG surgery · Does Endoscopic vein-graft open CO2 system harvesting (EVOH) reduce postoperative wound complications (composite endpoint of all complications or individual complications) assessed with ASEPSIS score?

  2. Patient satisfaction hypothesis [six weeks]

    · Does EVOH improve patient satisfaction, postoperative leg pain and quality of life assessed with VAS score and EUROQol-5D? To compare health-related quality of life for the two treatment arms (EVOH/CVH) by intention-to-treat To identify factors in addition to treatment assignment that are associated with variations in quality of life outcomes

  3. Resource utilization hypothesis [six weeks]

    When compared to Conventional vein-graft harvesting (CVH) in CABG surgery · Does EVOH affect resource utilization? Harvesting time related to the length of vein segments Harvesting closure time CABG time Mobility time Hospital length of stay Re-exploration for bleeding due to vein-graft bleed Readmission for leg wound complications Need for outpatient wound management resources To compare total medical costs for the two treatment arms (EVOH/CVH) by intention-to-treat

  4. Quality of vein harvesting hypothesis [six weeks]

    When compared to Conventional vein-graft harvesting (CVH) in CABG surgery Do EVOH compromises the quality of venous conduit harvested? Number of harvested veins requiring repair Number of repairs to each vein Re-exploration for bleeding due to vein-graft bleed Histological integrity Specific secondary subanalysis adjusted for: Preparation solution of the vein conduit 20 ml autologous blood 0,5 ml heparin (5000UI/ml) = 2500 UI 2 ml papavarine (30mg/ml) = 60 mg Uncontrolled distension pressure/ no touch technique harvesting

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Vein-graft patency hypothesis [six weeks]

    Does EVH Open-CO2 system influence and improve vein-graft patency? Assessment of systemic carbon dioxide absorption with respiratory and hemodynamic parameters Assessment of vein-graft patency with: vein conduit quality [diameter/well thickness] vein segments above/below the knee target coronary artery grafted territory target coronary artery diameter target coronary artery stenosis target coronary artery severity disease ascending aorta disease composite /uncomposite graft left ventricular function

  2. outcome hypothesis [18 months]

    § Detection of long-term outcomes: MACE (major adverse cardiac events): death; myocardial infarction; revascularization (PCI or CABG) for ischemia or angina recurrence MACE related to vein-graft failure GF (vein-graft failure): at least 75% of stenosis; GO (vein-graft occlusion) at angiographic study to identify factors in addition to treatment assignment that are associated with variations in long-term outcomes and graft patency baseline demographic characteristics and medications used of two treatment arms (EVOH/CVH)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Elective planned CABG surgery

  • First isolated CABG surgery

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Emergency revascularization: patients with hemodynamic instability or requiring inotropic or intra-aortic balloon support

  • Previous cardiac surgery

  • Planned concomitant valve surgery

  • Very varicous veins

  • Previous saphenectomy

  • History of deep vein thrombosis

  • History of suffered trauma on the lower extremity

  • Preoperative legs immobilization

  • Previous leg wound complications

  • Coexisting illness with life expectancy < five years

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Giovanni Battista di Torino Turin Piedmont Italy 10126

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista
  • LivaNova

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Antonio Campanella, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, San Giovanni Battista of Turin Hospital, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126 Turin, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Mauro Rinaldi, MD, PhD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, San Giovanni Battista of Turin Hospital, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126 Turin, Italy

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01121341
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CEI/7
First Posted:
May 12, 2010
Last Update Posted:
May 20, 2010
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2010

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 20, 2010