Myocardial Blood Flow by PET and N-13 Ammonia During Regadenoson vs Adenosine Stress

Sponsor
Mayo Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01370265
Collaborator
Astellas Pharma Inc (Industry)
12
1
2
16
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Blockage of the heart arteries (coronary artery disease) can lead to angina (chest pain), heart attacks, heart failure, and/or death. Positron emission tomography (PET) stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a powerful tool to help identify blockages in the coronary arteries. During the PET MPI test, a drug is given to mimic the effects of exercise on the heart. The study was done to measure blood flow to the heart using two similar drugs approved to mimic the effects of exercise on the heart in people during a heart stress test. The first drug, called adenosine, has been approved for this use for several decades. The second drug, called regadenoson, was approved in 2008. The investigators were looking at whether the increase in blood flow to the heart with the newer drug (regadenoson) was similar to the increase in blood flow with the older drug (adenosine). This information is important for the use of these drugs in patients and for interpreting the blood flow values.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The hypothesis for this study was that Regadenoson will produce a very similar degree of maximal hyperemia (increased blood flow) as adenosine, the other vasodilator agent. There were only 2 days on study for each subject.

On Day 1 of the study, subjects were interviewed and had a physical exam, including a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to exclude evidence of silent ischemia or myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular disorders. Subjects were instructed to have a light meal at least 4 hours prior to the PET MPI. Subjects were instructed to abstain from caffeine-containing products for 24 hours prior to the PET scan. Day 1 of the study occurred less than or equal to 4 weeks of Day 2.

On Day 2 of the study, each subject underwent three PET N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) dynamic emission acquisitions: resting, regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 mL IV), and adenosine (140 microgram/kg/min; order of regadenoson vs adenosine was randomized according to subject's birth year), and three transmission acquisitions for attenuation correction. Each emission acquisition was separated by 50 min to allow for radioactive decay. At the end of the drug infusions, subjects were monitored for 5-30 min. Based on the known short biological half-lives of these stress agents, the pharmacologic effects of each drug should have dissipated by the time the next drug was administered.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow by Positron Emission Tomography and N-13 Ammonia During Regadenoson vs Adenosine Stress
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Regadenoson, then Adenosine

Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the first intervention period. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the second intervention period (after washout period). Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.

Drug: Regadenoson
Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush.
Other Names:
  • Lexiscan
  • Drug: Adenosine
    Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes.
    Other Names:
  • Adenoscan
  • Drug: N-13 ammonia
    Ammonia N-13 Injection is a radioactive diagnostic agent for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) indicated for diagnostic PET imaging of the myocardium under rest or pharmacologic stress conditions to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected or existing coronary artery disease. The N-13 ammonia used in the study was synthesized by the Mayo Cyclotron Facility as per routine institutional clinical protocol.

    Active Comparator: Adenosine, then Regadenoson

    Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the first intervention period. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered. After a washout period, Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the second intervention period.

    Drug: Regadenoson
    Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush.
    Other Names:
  • Lexiscan
  • Drug: Adenosine
    Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes.
    Other Names:
  • Adenoscan
  • Drug: N-13 ammonia
    Ammonia N-13 Injection is a radioactive diagnostic agent for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) indicated for diagnostic PET imaging of the myocardium under rest or pharmacologic stress conditions to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected or existing coronary artery disease. The N-13 ammonia used in the study was synthesized by the Mayo Cyclotron Facility as per routine institutional clinical protocol.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Global Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF) [Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit]

      MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Hyperemic MBF is the rate of myocardial blood flow in the heart muscle during either regadenoson or adenosine stress. Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). The Hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Resting Global MBF and Resting Segmental MBF [Day 2, approximately 35 minutes after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit]

      MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Global Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes.

    2. Global Cardiac Flow Rate [Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit]

      Cardiac Flow Rate was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.

    3. Hyperemic Segmental MBF [Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit]

      Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes. The hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.

    4. Segmental CFR [Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit]

      CFR was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.

    5. Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute (BPM)) [Day 2, approximately 35 minutes and approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit]

      The resting heart rate was measured approximately 35 minutes after arrival in the PET unit. The hyperemic heart rate was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.

    6. Hyperemic Blood Pressure (mmHg) [Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit]

      Blood pressure was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    30 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Healthy male and female volunteers over the age of 30.

    • Written informed consent will be obtained from each subject.

    • Each subject will undergo a history and physical examination

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Any cardiovascular or pulmonary symptoms or exam findings

    • History of low blood pressure (< 90/50 mmHg)

    • Prior cardiac history

    • History of hypertension

    • History of hyperlipidemia

    • History of diabetes mellitus

    • History of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    • Weight of > 450 pounds

    • Chronic kidney disease

    • Other serious illness such as cancer

    • Current smoking

    • Medication use (with the exception of acetaminophen, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and thyroid hormone replacement)

    • Illicit drug use

    • Prior allergic reaction to adenosine, regadenoson, or aminophylline

    • Pregnancy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Mayo Clinic
    • Astellas Pharma Inc

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, M.D., Mayo Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Consultant, Associate Professor, Mayo Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01370265
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 10-006377
    First Posted:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2013
    Keywords provided by Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Consultant, Associate Professor, Mayo Clinic
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details From June 30 to December 27, 2011 subjects were recruited at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson, Then Adenosine Adenosine, Then Regadenoson
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the first intervention period. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the second intervention period (after washout period). Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the first intervention period. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered. After a washout period, Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the second intervention period.
    Period Title: Resting Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    STARTED 6 6
    COMPLETED 6 6
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: Resting Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    STARTED 6 6
    COMPLETED 6 6
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: Resting Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    STARTED 6 6
    COMPLETED 5 5
    NOT COMPLETED 1 1
    Period Title: Resting Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    STARTED 5 5
    COMPLETED 5 5
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: Resting Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    STARTED 5 5
    COMPLETED 5 5
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Entire Study Population
    Arm/Group Description Includes groups randomized to receive Regadenoson first and Adenosine first.
    Overall Participants 12
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    44
    (8)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    6
    50%
    Male
    6
    50%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    12
    100%
    Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
    26.1
    (4.3)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Global Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
    Description MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Hyperemic MBF is the rate of myocardial blood flow in the heart muscle during either regadenoson or adenosine stress. Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). The Hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol; one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mL/min/gm]
    3.1
    (1.4)
    3.1
    (1.2)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis for hyperemic global MBF between Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention), alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.14
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Resting Global MBF and Resting Segmental MBF
    Description MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Global Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 35 minutes after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Resting MBF was measured on all subjects prior to the interventions.
    Arm/Group Title Entire Study Population
    Arm/Group Description Includes groups randomized to receive Regadenoson first and Adenosine first.
    Measure Participants 10
    Resting Global MBF
    0.8
    (0.2)
    Resting Anterior MBF
    0.7
    (0.2)
    Resting Septum MBF
    0.9
    (0.2)
    Resting Inferior MBF
    0.8
    (0.2)
    Resting Lateral MBF
    0.8
    (0.2)
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Global Cardiac Flow Rate
    Description Cardiac Flow Rate was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol, one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [ratio]
    3.8
    (1.5)
    4.0
    (1.4)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis for Cardiac Flow Rate (CFR) between Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention), alpha level of 0.05
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.21
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Hyperemic Segmental MBF
    Description Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes. The hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol; one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Hyperemic MBF Anterior
    2.5
    (0.5)
    2.6
    (0.8)
    Hyperemic MBF Septum
    3.1
    (0.8)
    3.2
    (1.4)
    Hyperemic MBF Inferior
    3.5
    (1.6)
    3.6
    (1.3)
    Hyperemic MBF Lateral
    2.9
    (0.6)
    2.9
    (1.1)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention), for Hyperemic MBF Anterior, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.57
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for Hyperemic MBF Septum, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.13
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention)for Hyperemic MBF Inferior, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.44
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for Hyperemic MBF Lateral, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.74
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Segmental CFR
    Description CFR was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol, one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    CFR Anterior
    3.4
    (1.1)
    3.7
    (1.0)
    CFR Septum
    3.5
    (0.7)
    3.6
    (1.6)
    CFR Inferior
    4.4
    (1.4)
    4.6
    (1.3)
    CFR Lateral
    3.9
    (1.0)
    4.0
    (1.1)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention for CFR Anterior, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.78
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for CFR Septum, alpha level of 0.05
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.42
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention for CFR Inferior, alpha level of 0.05
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.96
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for CFR Lateral, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.13
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute (BPM))
    Description The resting heart rate was measured approximately 35 minutes after arrival in the PET unit. The hyperemic heart rate was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 35 minutes and approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol; one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Resting heart rate
    62
    (10)
    60
    (9)
    Hyperemic heart rate
    98
    (16)
    93
    (15)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for resting heart rate, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.28
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for hyperemic heart rate, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.51
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Hyperemic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
    Description Blood pressure was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
    Time Frame Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analysis per protocol; one participant in each group experienced an ischemic ECG with the first stress drug, and they were withdrawn from the study. This is a per intervention presentation.
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Systolic
    130
    (17)
    132
    (23)
    Diastolic
    72
    (11)
    75
    (17)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for systolic blood pressure, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.31
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Regadenoson, Adenosine
    Comments Statistical analysis comparing Regadenoson and Adenosine groups (per intervention) for diastolic blood pressure, alpha level of 0.05.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.08
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Subjects were monitored for adverse events for the time while on study, approximately 4 weeks.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Regadenoson Adenosine
    Arm/Group Description Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
    All Cause Mortality
    Regadenoson Adenosine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Regadenoson Adenosine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/12 (0%) 0/12 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Regadenoson Adenosine
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/12 (8.3%) 1/12 (8.3%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Ischemic ECG findings 1/12 (8.3%) 1 1/12 (8.3%) 1

    Limitations/Caveats

    Small sample size; Subjects had no evidence of overt coronary artery disease, occult coronary artery disease affecting stress drug induced hyperemic PET MBF is a possibility; however, hyperemic MBF with both stress drugs would be equally affected.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Dr. Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
    Organization Mayo Clinic
    Phone 507-284-1648
    Email chareonthaitawee.panithaya@mayo.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Consultant, Associate Professor, Mayo Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01370265
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 10-006377
    First Posted:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2013