PROTECTION-III: Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A Sequential Scan Protocol

Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00612092
Collaborator
(none)
400
1
2
9.1
44.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare radiation dose of a standard spiral scan with the a new sequential scan protocol. We hypothesize that the sequential scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.

Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, diagnostic accuracy for spiral versus sequential studies compared to invasive angiography in patients who underwent subsequent invasive coronary angiography.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Spiral image acquisition
  • Radiation: sequential image acquisition
Phase 4

Detailed Description

All patients scheduled for a coronary CT scan are screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are included if they have stable sinus rhythm (heart rate <75 bpm for dual source CT and <65 bpm for 64-slice CT). Informed signed consent is obtained from these patients and the CT scan is prepared. After topogram scan and the native scan for Ca-Scoring, patients are randomized in two groups with the use of sealed envelopes. After that contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography is performed with the standard spiral protocol or with the sequential protocol.

The CT examination is evaluated by two experienced investigators on a per-vessel basis and all results and study-related data are collected in a dedicated database. For assessment of image quality, a previously established 4-point score system is used and quantitative image quality parameters are measured.

A 30 day follow-up after the CT examination aims to evaluate if patients underwent invasive coronary angiography or were scheduled for a myocardial stress / perfusion test (such as stress-echocardiography, myocardial scintigraphy or stress perfusion imaging by MRI).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
400 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A Sequential Scan Protocol
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2008
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2009
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1

Standard spiral CT protocol

Radiation: Spiral image acquisition
standard spiral scan protocol

Active Comparator: 2

Sequential CT protocol

Radiation: sequential image acquisition
sequential CT scan protocol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Compared with a helical scan protocol the use of a sequential scan protocol is associated with a comparable diagnostic image quality, while the radiation dose estimates are significantly reduced. [1 month]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. impact of the sequential scan protocol on quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios [30 days]

  2. diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values) for studies scanned with helical vs. sequential scan protocol when compared with invasive coronary angiography on a per-vessel based analysis [30 days]

  3. frequency of non-diagnostic CTA studies when comparing studies scanned with the helical vs. the sequential scan protocol [30 days]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)

  • stable sinus rhythm

  • heart rate < 75 bpm with dual-source CT or < 65 bpm with single-source CT

  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • non-ECG triggered studies

  • non-coronary CTA studies, e.g. bypass graft CTAs, pre- or post EP studies, CABG planning studies

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen Munich Germany 80636

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joerg Hausleiter, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00612092
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GE IDE No. R00308
First Posted:
Feb 11, 2008
Last Update Posted:
Aug 27, 2008
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2008
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 27, 2008