OPTICO-BVS: Optical Coherence Tomography to Improve Outcome for Coronary Revascularisation Using Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Sponsor
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02683356
Collaborator
(none)
38
1
2
38
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Fully Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) have been introduced with the objective to preserve native vessel geometry, allow for adaptive vessel remodeling with late lumen gain, restore physiological vasomotion, and avoid late adverse events including restenosis and scaffold thrombosis. Although randomized clinical trials in low risk patients to date suggest non-inferiority in terms of safety and efficacy compared with metallic DES, several reports have raised concerns regarding the scaffold thrombosis highlighting the importance of technical considerations regarding lesion preparation and scaffold expansion. OCT offers the opportunity to plan the procedure and optimize the implantation of BVS.

The hypothesis of the present study is that a strategy of OCT-guided PCI using BVS is superior to angiography-guided PCI (e.g. by selecting scaffold dimension on the basis of a pre-procedural OCT and applying corrective measures in case of suboptimal treatment result as indicated by OCT).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: OCT-guided PCI
  • Other: Angiography-guided PCI
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
38 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Optical Coherence Tomography to Improve Outcome for Coronary Revascularisation Using Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: OCT-guided PCI

OCT before and after Stent implantation

Other: OCT-guided PCI
Patients assigned to the OCT-guided PCI strategy will undergo OCT prior to PCI to determine vessel and lesion dimensions and treatment strategy. OCT will be repeated at the end of the procedure and corrective PCI will aim to optimize the PCI result according to pre-specified criteria in terms of minimal lumen area, scaffold expansion, apposition, residual dissections or intra-scaffold thrombus formation

Active Comparator: Angiography-guided PCI

OCT after Stent implantation

Other: Angiography-guided PCI
Patients assigned to the OCT-guided PCI strategy will only undergo OCT after PCI to determine vessel and lesion dimensions and treatment strategy.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Minimal in-scaffold lumen area (mm2) as assessed by OCT [6 months]

    The lumen area is assessed by OCT

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of adverse events [6 months]

    Adverse events are defined as scaffold underexpansions, significant strut malappositions or uncovered struts, expansion asymmetries, any intrascaffold tissue, edge dissections, or restenoses (as assessed by OCT)

  2. OCT imaging endpoints [6 months]

    Scaffold underexpansion, significant strut malapposition or uncovered struts, expansion asymmetry, any intrascaffold tissue, edge dissection, or restenosis. (as assessed by OCT)

  3. Additional OCT imaging endpoints [6 months]

    Significant malapposed scaffold struts, % Malapposed scaffold struts, % Uncovered scaffold struts, % Incomplete scaffold apposition area, mm2 Incomplete scaffold apposition distance, mm Neointimal thickness, µm Neointimal area, mm2 Volume obstruction, %

  4. OCT imaging endpoints [end of procedure]

    Minimal in-scaffold lumen area, mm Scaffold expansion, % No of patients with scaffold expansion <80% % lesions with significant malapposition % malapposed struts

  5. angiographic endpoints [end of procedure]

    acute lumen gain in-scaffold minimal lumen diameter in-segment minimal lumen diameter in-scaffold % diameter stenosis in-segment % diameter stenosis

  6. angiographic endpoints [6 months]

    In-scaffold late lumen loss, mm In-segment late lumen loss, mm In-scaffold % diameter stenosis In-segment % diameter stenosis Binary restenosis, % Percent diameter stenosis, %

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age ≥18 years.

  2. Patient provides signed written informed consent before any study-specific procedure.

  3. De novo native coronary artery disease with lesions that have a distal and proximal reference vessel diameter in the range between 2.25mm and 3.8mm.

  4. Single or multi vessel disease. For multi vessel disease up to two vessels and three lesions treated at baseline with no more than two lesions per vessel. Vessel is defined as, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries. Any branch within the vessel is considered part of the vessel.

  5. Full revascularization of all lesions should be achievable (staged PCI not recommended)

  6. Elective or ad hoc PCI, stable angina and acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS and STEMI).

  7. Angiographically significant (>50% visual estimation) stenosis present in at least one native coronary artery and evidence of ischemia.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Subjects with left main lesion.

  2. Aorto-ostial lesion location within 3 mm of the aorta junction (both right and left).

  3. Subjects with restenosis or stent thrombosis in the target vessel.

  4. Severely calcified lesions requiring rotablation.

  5. Bifurcation with sidebranch >2.5mm or any sidebranch that possibly requires treatment with angulation >70°

  6. Severe angulation (>90°) or excessive tortuosity (>two 45° angles)

  7. Known renal insufficiency (serum creatinine clearance <45ml/min or receiving dialysis).

  8. Vessel(s) and lesion(s) not amenable for PCI, for example diffuse disease.

  9. Female of childbearing potential (age <50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy

  10. Life expectancy less than 1 year.

  11. Indication for oral anticoagulation

  12. Known allergy against protocol-required medications including ASA, prasugrel, ticagrelor, clopidogrel, heparin, iodinated contrast (the latter in case it cannot be adequately premedicated)

  13. History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy.

  14. Planned surgery within the next 6 months

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Inselspital Bern Bern Switzerland 3010

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lorenz Räber, MD PhD, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Stephan Windecker, Prof. MD, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02683356
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2016-01-16
First Posted:
Feb 17, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Mar 10, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 10, 2022