EUDOCO: Early Versus Delayed Intubation of Patients With COVID-19

Sponsor
Evangelismos Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04632043
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
6.4
12.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Although management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often includes mechanical ventilation, the optimal timing of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation remains unknown.

We hypothesise that a randomized controlled trial comparing early intubation as opposed to delayed intubation among patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is feasible.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Endotracheal intubation
N/A

Detailed Description

A common manifestation of COVID-19 is severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with COVID-19 often includes mechanical ventilation. The optimal timing of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation remains unknown.

On the one hand, early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (i.e. early endotracheal intubation) has been advocated as a means to reduce subsequent possible aerosolization of the virus, as would happen by alternate means of oxygenation/ventilation allowing air leaks. Also, early intubation may prevent the induction of self-inflicted lung injury in patients who breath spontaneously and have high respiratory drive and, therefore, large transpulmonary pressure swings. On the other hand, delaying intubation, by trying alternate means of oxygenation/ventilation, may mean that some of the patients may not be intubated at all and therefore will be protected from the adverse events of invasive mechanical ventilation (such as ventilator-induced lung injury, ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction). The latter strategy may also address the unavailability of enough ventilators to meet the increased demand of treating patients with COVID-19.

Given that no randomized controlled trials are currently available to guide clinical practice regarding optimal timing of intubation, we propose a single-center randomized controlled feasibility trial to compare early intubation versus delayed intubation among patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The aim is that we gain experience and produce pilot data, which could inform the design of a subsequent large multi-center clinical trial.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of Early versUs Delayed intubatiOn on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 (EUDOCO): a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 18, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Early intubation

Patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (defined as the need for non-rebreather mask or high flow nasal oxygen with setting FiO2 of at least 90% or non-invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain a SpO2 >92%) for at least 48 hours will undergo intubation.

Other: Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation

Active Comparator: Delayed intubation

Patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (defined as the need for non-rebreather mask or high flow nasal oxygen with setting FiO2 of at least 90% or non-invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain a SpO2 >92%) for at least 48 hours will continue to receive non-rebreather mask, high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilation in an attempt to avoid intubation.

Other: Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time from onset of severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure to intubation [28 days]

    Difference in time from onset of severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure to intubation between the two groups will be the primary (feasibility) outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Organ failure-free days [28 days]

    Number of days without the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and continuous renal replacement therapy with days after death not to be considered as organ failure-free days

  2. Need for continuous renal replacement therapy [28 days]

  3. Ventilator-free days [28 days]

  4. ICU-free days [28 days]

    Intensive care unit-free days

  5. Mortality [28 days]

    All-cause ICU-mortality

  6. Number of severe post-intubation adverse events [Within 30 minutes from intubation]

    Cardiac arrest and severe arterial desaturation (defined as SpO2 <80% for >5 minutes)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 and severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Postoperative acute respiratory failure (within one week from surgery)

  • After cardiac arrest

  • Chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure

  • Hypercapnic respiratory failure

  • No full code

  • Lack of equipoise of the clinical team

  • Lack of informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Evangelismos Hospital Athens Attiki Greece 10676

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Evangelismos Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ilias Siempos, MD, DSc, Evangelismos Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ilias Siempos, Pulmonologist, Intensivist, Evangelismos Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04632043
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 32635, 13-10-2020
First Posted:
Nov 17, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 3, 2021
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Ilias Siempos, Pulmonologist, Intensivist, Evangelismos Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 3, 2021