Co-infection Management in COVID-19 Critically Ill

Sponsor
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04382092
Collaborator
BioMérieux (Industry)
32
1
1
1.1
30.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

International guidelines suggest the administration of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics for suspected bacterial co-infection in COVID-19 critically ill. However, data on associated respiratory infections is rare and antimicrobial stewardship interventions promoting antibiotic savings are non-existent in this context.

The main objectives of the trial are:

to evaluate the rate of co-infections among COVID-19 critically ill to evaluate the added value of a a rapid molecular diagnostic tool (FA-PNEU) to detect the presence of co-infecting pathogens in order to rapidly tailor the patient's antibiotic treatment

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: FilmArray Pneumonia
N/A

Detailed Description

At the end of April 2020, the World Health Organisation reported that nearly three million people worldwide were infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) of whom 202 000 people already died from the associated disease named COVID-19. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic carriage to a severe respiratory infection with an acute respiratory distress syndrome and it has been calculated that approximately 5% of COVID-19 patients require intensive care. Dramatically, the reported mortality rate 28 days following admission upon the intensive care unit (ICU) is as high as 61.5%.

The 23th of March, an expert team of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) has released a series of guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill in which they address recommendations on infection control and testing, hemodynamic control, ventilatory support and therapy. Considering the latter, the use of empiric antimicrobial/antibacterial agents is suggested among patients who have respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation because of suspected co-infection. Reported rates of bacterial co-infection in Influenza A patients range from 6 to 65%. It could be thought that SARS-CoV-2 destroys the respiratory epithelium in a similar way thereby facilitating bacterial invasion. SSC experts further suggest to assess for de-escalation. Rationally the adjustment to a targeted antibiotherapy requires a microbiological diagnosis of the suspected bacterial co-infection. Contemporary laboratory culture-based testing on lower respiratory tract samples requires a minimum of 24-48 hours to obtain respectively identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results. During this incompressible time interval, administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is maintained with a risk of selecting multi-resistant bacteria potentially causing nosocomial infections. Aiming to reduce time of microbiological analysis, molecular tools have been very recently developed allowing the detection of a panel of microorganisms including bacteria and viruses directly from a lower respiratory tract sample within a few hours. Recent evaluations reported satisfying performances compared to routine microbiological methods and forecasted a substantial benefit of molecular testing in the speeded-up instauration of a targeted antibiotherapy and isolation precautions in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

In this prospective clinical trial, the investigators performed a rapid molecular test on the initial lower respiratory sample of each COVID-19 patient admitted to ICU. The primary objective of the study was to determine the rate of co-infections in COVID-19 critically ill and the secondary objective was to measure the impact of the rapid molecular diagnostic test on the antimicrobial management of all included patients. The investigators hypothesized the rapid results of the detected pathogens will support the intensive care physician in the initiation of a targeted antibiotic treatment but also in the weaning of any antibiotherapy if all microorganisms remain undetected.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
prospective interventional studyprospective interventional study
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Co-infections in COVID-19 Critically Ill and Antibiotic Management
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 23, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 24, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 24, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intervention COVID-19

Respiratory samples are treated according to routine laboratory testing : culture, immuno assays AND molecular testing (FilmArray PNEU) of the endotracheal aspirate sample 24 hours a day.

Diagnostic Test: FilmArray Pneumonia
Respiratory samples are treated according to routine laboratory testing : culture, immuno assays AND molecular testing (FilmArray PNEU) of the endotracheal aspirate sample 24 hours a day.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. % of COVID-19 co-infections [through study completion, an average of 1 month]

    COVID-19 infections with additional bacteria/viruses identified through FA-PNEU testing

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. % of antibiotic switches following FA results [through study completion, an average of 1 month]

    The rapid FA results could allow a fast modification of the empirical antibiotherapy. This percentage will be measured.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients remaining at the intensive care (SIM, SIT) of the CUSL with a confirmed COVID-19 infection
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients from whom no respiratory sample can be obtained or

  • Patients benefitting from palliative care or

  • Insufficient volume of the respiratory sample after routine testing to perform the FA-PNEU test.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Brussels Belgium 1200

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
  • BioMérieux

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexia VERROKEN, MD, PhD, Cliniques universitaires St-Luc

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04382092
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2019/14MAR/124
First Posted:
May 11, 2020
Last Update Posted:
May 11, 2020
Last Verified:
May 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 11, 2020