Diagnostic Performance of an Antigen Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
A comparison of a direct antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 obtained by mid-turbinate swab with the reference standard rt-PCR test obtained by nasopharyngeal swab in outpatients with symptoms compatible with COVID-19.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This study plans to compare a direct antigen test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) obtained by mid-turbinate nasal swab with a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) test obtained by nasopharyngeal swab (the current reference standard) in a population of patients with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 for fewer than 5 days. Subjects whose physicians have already ordered an rt-PCR test at a Carilion testing center will be screened and recruited by phone during a required scheduling call. The study coordinator will describe the study by phone, and the subject will be consented when they arrive at the testing center. After consenting, a mid-turbinate swab direct antigen test will be obtained just prior to the ordered nasopharyngeal swab and any other ordered tests. The subjects will receive their rt-PCR test results through the usual channels of clinical notification. The subjects will not receive their nasal antigen results. The antigen test results will be analyzed in a batch process and the results entered into RedCap by the study staff. The rt-PCR results will be extracted from the Epic electronic health record using patient identifiers and paired with the corresponding antigen result for statistical analysis.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Study Population All subjects will undergo bilateral mid-turbinate swabs for COVID Antigen (Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA)) as well as bilateral rt-PCR testing (Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR). |
Diagnostic Test: Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen FIA
Obtained via bilateral mid-turbinate swab.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of True Positives [1 day]
Of all Disease (rtPCR) Positive subjects, the proportion who were Test (antigen) Positive (sensitivity).
- Proportion of True Negatives [1 day]
Of all Disease (rtPCR) Negative subjects, the proportion who were Test (antigen) Negative (specificity).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Acutely ill with one or more COVID-19 symptoms
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unable to speak English
-
Unable to provide written informed consent
-
Symptoms have lasted longer than 5 days
-
Currently hospitalized
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carilion Clinic | Roanoke | Virginia | United States | 24016 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Carilion Clinic
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John W Epling, MD, Carilion Clinic
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
- Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection by Detection of Nucleocapsid Protein
Publications
- Blairon L, Wilmet A, Beukinga I, Tré-Hardy M. Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104472. Epub 2020 May 30.
- Castro R, Luz PM, Wakimoto MD, Veloso VG, Grinsztejn B, Perazzo H. COVID-19: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of commercial assays registered in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar - Apr;24(2):180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
- La Marca A, Capuzzo M, Paglia T, Roli L, Trenti T, Nelson SM. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a systematic review and clinical guide to molecular and serological in-vitro diagnostic assays. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Sep;41(3):483-499. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
- Lambert-Niclot S, Cuffel A, Le Pape S, Vauloup-Fellous C, Morand-Joubert L, Roque-Afonso AM, Le Goff J, Delaugerre C. Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal Swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). pii: e00977-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00977-20. Print 2020 Jul 23.
- Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau CS, Lam ET, Chan RC, Tsang DN. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
- Mertens P, De Vos N, Martiny D, Jassoy C, Mirazimi A, Cuypers L, Van den Wijngaert S, Monteil V, Melin P, Stoffels K, Yin N, Mileto D, Delaunoy S, Magein H, Lagrou K, Bouzet J, Serrano G, Wautier M, Leclipteux T, Van Ranst M, Vandenberg O; LHUB-ULB SARS-CoV-2 Working Diagnostic Group. Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 8;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.
- Nagura-Ikeda M, Imai K, Tabata S, Miyoshi K, Murahara N, Mizuno T, Horiuchi M, Kato K, Imoto Y, Iwata M, Mimura S, Ito T, Tamura K, Kato Y. Clinical Evaluation of Self-Collected Saliva by Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), Direct RT-qPCR, Reverse Transcription-Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and a Rapid Antigen Test To Diagnose COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). pii: e01438-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01438-20. Print 2020 Aug 24.
- Porte L, Legarraga P, Vollrath V, Aguilera X, Munita JM, Araos R, Pizarro G, Vial P, Iruretagoyena M, Dittrich S, Weitzel T. Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
- Scohy A, Anantharajah A, Bodéus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Verroken A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104455. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455. Epub 2020 May 21.
- Soleimani R, Deckers C, Huang TD, Bogaerts P, Evrard S, Wallemme I, Habib B, Rouzé P, Denis O. Rapid COVID-19 antigenic tests: Usefulness of a modified method for diagnosis. J Med Virol. 2021 Sep;93(9):5655-5659. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27094. Epub 2021 May 31.
- Takeuchi Y, Akashi Y, Kato D, Kuwahara M, Muramatsu S, Ueda A, Notake S, Nakamura K, Ishikawa H, Suzuki H. Diagnostic performance and characteristics of anterior nasal collection for the SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: a prospective study. Sci Rep. 2021 May 18;11(1):10519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90026-8.
- IRB-20-1088
- Epling-533
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects were aged 18 years or older and had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (as assessed by their clinicians) for five days or less. All subjects underwent bilateral mid-turbinate swabs for COVID Antigen (Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA)) as well as bilateral rt-PCR testing (Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 117 |
COMPLETED | 117 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects were aged 18 years or older and had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (as assessed by their clinicians) for five days or less. All subjects underwent bilateral mid-turbinate swabs for COVID Antigen (Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA)) as well as bilateral rt-PCR testing (Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab. |
Overall Participants | 117 |
Age, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
Age |
0
0%
|
Sex/Gender, Customized (Count of Participants) | |
Gender |
0
0%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
117
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Proportion of True Positives |
---|---|
Description | Of all Disease (rtPCR) Positive subjects, the proportion who were Test (antigen) Positive (sensitivity). |
Time Frame | 1 day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects were aged 18 years or older and had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (as assessed by their clinicians) for five days or less. All subjects underwent bilateral mid-turbinate swabs for COVID Antigen (Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA)) as well as bilateral rt-PCR testing (Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab. |
Measure Participants | 117 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of true positives] |
0.750
|
Title | Proportion of True Negatives |
---|---|
Description | Of all Disease (rtPCR) Negative subjects, the proportion who were Test (antigen) Negative (specificity). |
Time Frame | 1 day |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects were aged 18 years or older and had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (as assessed by their clinicians) for five days or less. No other baseline characteristics were collected. |
Measure Participants | 117 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of true negatives] |
0.988
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 day | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The testing center staff/research coordinators were instructed to contact the Principal Investigator (or the Testing Center manager) for any unanticipated adverse events during the study. The details of the event would have been logged in RedCap. The risk of those events were to be assessed by the PI, appropriate medical care of the subject would have been ensured, and the IRB would have been informed of any event deemed more than minor, or for any event that recurred. | |
Arm/Group Title | Study Population | |
Arm/Group Description | All subjects were aged 18 years or older and had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 (as assessed by their clinicians) for five days or less. All subjects underwent bilateral mid-turbinate swabs for COVID Antigen (Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA)) as well as bilateral rt-PCR testing (Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR) via nasopharyngeal swab. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Study Population | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/117 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Study Population | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/117 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Study Population | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/117 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | John Epling, MD, MSEd |
---|---|
Organization | Carilion Clinic |
Phone | 540-581-0123 |
jwepling@carilionclinic.org |
- IRB-20-1088
- Epling-533