Xylofuns: Xylocaine to Freeze During Unpleasant Nasopharyngeal Swabs
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) have been recommended to detect the virus. This procedure has been reported to be painful by 85% of children The aim of the study was to assess whether pretreatment with topical lidocaine reduces the discomfort experienced by children during a nasopharyngeal swab.
This was a RCT among children aged 8-17 years old who need a NPS. The primary outcome was pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analog Scale .
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Xylocaine The study intervention was the administration of 10 mg of intranasal lidocaine in one nostril using 1 spray of 0.1mL of a 10% lidocaine solution 5 minutes before NPS. This was done using the standard long nozzle. |
Drug: Xylocaine
The study intervention was the administration of 10 mg of intranasal lidocaine in one nostril using 1 spray of 0.1mL of a 10% lidocaine solution 5 minutes before NPS. This was done using the standard long nozzle
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Control The control group received the placebo with the same application technique using an empty bottle of lidocaine 10% with the same long nozzle for delivery. |
Drug: Placebo
The control group received the placebo with the same application technique using an empty bottle of lidocaine 10% with the same long nozzle for delivery
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pain during the procedure [During procedure]
Self-reported pain immediately after the NPS as measured using a validated self-reported pain scale: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Anxiety during the procedure [During procedure]
● Evaluation of fear prior to the administration of the study intervention and the NPS using the Children's Fear Scale
- Discomfort [During procedure]
Discomfort at administration of the study intervention using a yes/no question
- Pain 2 NRS [During procedure]
Evaluation of pain immediately after the NPS using a clinically relevant tool, the verbal Numeric Rating Scale
- Number of patients with physical restriction [During procedure]
Evaluation of the patient position (sitting, lying down, standing) and if physical restraints was done (none, redirection of movements, comfort position/minimal comfortable restriction or actively restrain) to perform the swab and to which extent
- Utility according to nurses [During procedure]
● Triage nurses evaluation on the efficiency of the intervention in reducing pain in the patient, using a likert scale of 1 to 5
- Adverse event [48 hours following intervention]
Adverse effects reported by caregivers in the 24-48hrs following administration of medication
- Desire to reuse the intervention in a futur procedure, at follow up [48 hours following intervention]
Asking caregivers in the 24-48hrs following intervention if they would recommend the intervention before a NPS as standard of care for pediatric patients. Yes/no question.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion:
-
6-17 years old inclusively
-
Children for whom a NPS was ordered
Exclusion:
-
Children presenting with the following acute conditions, which could either prevent the lidocaine from being properly administered, or pose a risk for the patient as increased absorption of the medication might occur:
-
Nasal or airway burns, trauma or major anomaly
-
Cardiorespiratory compromise
-
Children for whom an informed consent could not be obtained
-
Any other life-threatening condition or priority one patient requiring emergency support
-
Language barrier
-
Children presenting with conditions that could prevent their ability to reliably report their pain:
-
Severe intellectual disability
-
Severe pain upon presentation
-
Administration of opiates prior to the NPS
-
Children presenting with the following chronic conditions, which could either prevent the lidocaine from being properly administered, or pose a risk for the patient:
-
Hypersensitivity/allergy to the medication or a known component
-
Methemoglobinemia
-
G6PD deficiency
-
Familial malignant hyperthermia
-
Pseudocholinesterase deficiency
-
Severe hepatic impairment
-
Severe cardiac condition or use of antiarrhythmic medication
-
Risk of airway aspiration
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Evelyne D Trottier | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H3T1C5 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Evelyne D.Trottier
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2021-3414