A Randomized Controlled Trial of ACT-P Versus T4C for Community Reentry

Sponsor
Iowa State University (Other)
Overall Status
Enrolling by invitation
CT.gov ID
NCT05109689
Collaborator
(none)
400
1
2
57.3
7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for prisons (ACT-P) and Thinking for a Change (T4C) as reentry programs in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: ACT-P
  • Behavioral: T4C
N/A

Detailed Description

The proposed study will focus on medium to high risk adult males, currently institutionalized and approaching release, who will be randomized to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for prisons (ACT-P) or the Thinking for a Change (T4C) program. ACT-P is a cognitive behavioral treatment that targets acceptance and mindfulness processes to reduce criminal behavior, and has been adapted for the prison setting. T4C is a widely used and well-established traditional cognitive behavioral program that targets changing criminal thinking.

The first aim of the study is to test the relative efficacy of the ACT-P intervention, compared to T4C, on recidivism. Recidivism will be measured in 3 ways: rearrests, reconvictions, and reincarceration during the 3 years post-release. A secondary aim is to test the theory of change and the proposed mechanisms of ACT-P and T4C. By focusing on the mechanisms that account for program success, it will provide insight into the theory of change underlying each program. Based on the theories underlying each treatment, we hypothesize differences in mechanisms of action between the two treatments. Given the emphasis in T4C on cognitive change, we predict stronger mediation effects in T4C for reductions in antisocial/criminal thinking. In contrast, we hypothesize that increases in psychological flexibility would be stronger mediators for ACT-P than for T4C.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
400 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants will be randomized into either ACT-P or T4C, two group programs that will run simultaneously.Participants will be randomized into either ACT-P or T4C, two group programs that will run simultaneously.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of ACT-P Versus T4C for Community Reentry: Differential Efficacy and Mechanisms of Change
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 21, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: ACT-P

ACT-P is a cognitive behavioral program based on acceptance and commitment therapy, and it has been modified for use in the prison setting.

Behavioral: ACT-P
ACT-P consists of five modules. The Big Picture sessions are interwoven throughout the 24 sessions to introduce the main concepts of the curriculum, such as values identification and awareness of criminal behaviors. The Emotion Regulation and Cognitive Skills modules focus on awareness of internal experiences; learning new ways to respond to internal experiences; identifying and stepping back from problematic/criminal thoughts and beliefs; awareness of behaviors in service of values versus behaviors in service of control/avoidance; and identifying steps for behavior change. The Behavioral Skills module focuses on practicing prosocial behaviors, such as speaking and listening effectively and conflict resolution. Finally, the Barriers to Change module addresses environmental or life circumstances that can hinder successful behavior change (e.g., toxic masculinity, substance use, and parenting difficulties).

Active Comparator: T4C

Thinking for Change (T4C) is an evidence-based cognitive behavioral program focused on changing criminal thinking.

Behavioral: T4C
T4C is an integrated cognitive behavioral change program authored by Drs. Jack Bush, Barry Glick, and Juliana Taymans under a cooperative agreement with the National Institute of Corrections (NIC). The program is based on the principle that thinking controls how people act, and that to change the way people act, they have to control their thinking. T4C systematically presents the concept that thoughts cause one's behavior, and offenders learn to identify their own thought patterns that lead to risky behavior, and then to replace those maladaptive thoughts with new ones. T4C incorporates research from cognitive restructuring theory, social skills development, and the learning and use of problem solving skills.
Other Names:
  • Thinking for a Change
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Rearrests, convictions, and reincarcerations [3 years post-release]

      Criminal activity

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Male
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • deemed medium or high risk according to the Iowa Risk Revised

    • eligible and appropriate for cognitive programming as determined by normal operating procedures

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • court-mandated to either program

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Fort Dodge Correctional Facility Fort Dodge Iowa United States 50501

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Iowa State University

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Amie Zarling, Associate Professor, Iowa State University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05109689
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 19-569-00
    First Posted:
    Nov 5, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 6, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Amie Zarling, Associate Professor, Iowa State University

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 6, 2022