Advantages and Disadvantages of Long Term Sedation in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Sponsor
Odense University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00466492
Collaborator
(none)
140
1
1
25
5.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether sedation of the critical ill patient prolongs the time receiving mechanical ventilation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Sedation or no sedation during mechanical ventilation
N/A

Detailed Description

The golden standard is to sedate critical ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation with daily wake up trials. This is shown to reduce the time receiving mechanical ventilation compared to no wake up trials.

We would like to study whether no sedation but only analgesics administered as bolus doses, reduce the time receiving mechanical ventilation. The study is planned as a randomised prospective study, not blinded. The control group is patients receiving sedation with daily wake up trials. The intervention group is not sedated, but receives bolus doses of analgesics (morphine). The endpoint is the time spend receiving mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay on the intensive care unit, and total lengths of stay on the hospital.

We also examine the frequency of ventilator associated pneumonia and CT scans of cerebrum. Also we would like to examine the long term psychological effects of sedation, we plan to send some of the patients to a post traumatic stress screening. The effect on the next of kin we plan to study with a questionnaire. As a last thing we would like to study the workload on the nurses.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
140 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Advantages and Disadvantages of Long Term Sedation in ICU Patients
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: No sedatation intervention

The intervention group is the normal care in our institution, the control group is the golden standard

Procedure: Sedation or no sedation during mechanical ventilation
No sedation to critically ill patients
Other Names:
  • Awake
  • intensive care
  • Denmark
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Time receiving mechanical ventilation, total intensive care and hospital length of stay. []

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. The frequency of VAP, CTC. The amount of Post Traumatic Stress after 6 month. The patients families experience. The workload on the nurses [VAP and CTC during hospital stay. PTSD 1-2 years after the primary stay]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Intubated receiving mechanical ventilation

    • Expected to remain intubated more than 24 hours

    • Over 18 years

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Raised intracranial pressure

    • Pregnant

    • Treatment with muscle relaxants

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Anaesthesiologic-intensive Care Department, Odense University Hospital Odense C Denmark 5000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Odense University Hospital

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Palle Toft, Professor, Institute of Clinical Research

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00466492
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 22-6-06
    First Posted:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2009

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 19, 2010