HAND2END: Comparing Manual Versus Stapled Side to Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn's Disease
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
RESEARCH QUESTION Are handsewn (end to end and Kono S side to side) anastomoses superior to side to side stapled anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to endoscopic recurrence, gastrointestinal function and costs.
HYPOTHESIS Stapled side anastomosis advised in ECCO guidelines heal with ulcerations on the staple line causing systematic over scoring of endoscopic recurrence leading to unjustified restarting of expensive drugs reducing QOL and increasing costs. Side to side saccular configuration causes stasis affecting recurrence and dysfunction.
DESIGN Randomised superiority study
POPULATION Patients with Crohn requiring (re)resection of the (neo)terminal ileum
INTERVENTION Kono S and end to end hand sewn anastomosis
USUAL CARE Side to side stapled anastomosis
OUTCOME Endoscopic recurrence (local and central reading) at 6 months
SAMPLE 25% reduction in 2:1 ratio -> 126 + 63 = 189 patients
KEYWORDS Crohn, ileocolic resection, recurrence
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Handsewn ileocolic anastomosis Randomised comparison of handsewn (end-to-end and the Kono-S) with the side-to-side stapled anastomosis. to use a manual anastomosis technique avoiding stapled technique to verify if stapled anastomosis can cause ulcers at endoscopic follow up with systematic overscoring |
Procedure: Handsewn anastomosis
To perform hand sewn anastomosis (either end to end or Kono-s) during the reconstruction face of ileocolic resection
|
No Intervention: Side to side stapled anastomosis Randomised comparison of handsewn (end-to-end and the Kono-S) with the side-to-side stapled anastomosis. to use a manual anastomosis technique avoiding stapled technique to verify if stapled anastomosis can cause ulcers at endoscopic follow up with systematic overscoring |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- 6 months endoscopic recurrence of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification. [6 months]
The comparison of 6 months endoscopic recurrence between local and central reading of recordings of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Morbidity [1 year]
postoperative morbidity measure
- Clinical Recurrence [1 year]
Clinical and surgical recurrence using Clavien Dindo
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) [1 year]
Quality of life measured with IBD questionnaire
- Hospital Costs [1 year]
Hospital costs per patient in both groups
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Males and females aged >18 years
-
Ileocolic disease or disease of the neoterminal ileum with an indication for resection
-
Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, and anti-TNF therapy are permitted.
-
All patients should have undergone a colonoscopy and MR enterography (or CT enterography if MR contraindicated) in last 3 months to assess extent of disease.
-
Ability to comply with protocol.
-
Competent and able to provide written informed consent.
-
Patient must have been discussed in the local MDT
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inability to give informed consent.
-
Patients less than 16 years of age.
-
Patients undergoing repeated ileocolic resection.
-
History of cancer < 5 years which might influence patients prognosis
-
Emergent operation. Pregnant or breast feeding.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | irccs San Raffaele | Milan | Italy |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- IRCCS San Raffaele
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 5.2