HAND2END: Comparing Manual Versus Stapled Side to Side Ileocolic Anastomosis in Crohn's Disease

Sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05246917
Collaborator
(none)
189
1
2
31.2
6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

RESEARCH QUESTION Are handsewn (end to end and Kono S side to side) anastomoses superior to side to side stapled anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to endoscopic recurrence, gastrointestinal function and costs.

HYPOTHESIS Stapled side anastomosis advised in ECCO guidelines heal with ulcerations on the staple line causing systematic over scoring of endoscopic recurrence leading to unjustified restarting of expensive drugs reducing QOL and increasing costs. Side to side saccular configuration causes stasis affecting recurrence and dysfunction.

DESIGN Randomised superiority study

POPULATION Patients with Crohn requiring (re)resection of the (neo)terminal ileum

INTERVENTION Kono S and end to end hand sewn anastomosis

USUAL CARE Side to side stapled anastomosis

OUTCOME Endoscopic recurrence (local and central reading) at 6 months

SAMPLE 25% reduction in 2:1 ratio -> 126 + 63 = 189 patients

KEYWORDS Crohn, ileocolic resection, recurrence

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Handsewn anastomosis
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
189 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomised superiority studyRandomised superiority study
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Rct in croHn's Disease: Comparing mANual (End to End and Kono-s) Versus stapleD Side TO Side Ileocolic Anastomosis (HANDTOEND)
Actual Study Start Date :
May 25, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Handsewn ileocolic anastomosis

Randomised comparison of handsewn (end-to-end and the Kono-S) with the side-to-side stapled anastomosis. to use a manual anastomosis technique avoiding stapled technique to verify if stapled anastomosis can cause ulcers at endoscopic follow up with systematic overscoring

Procedure: Handsewn anastomosis
To perform hand sewn anastomosis (either end to end or Kono-s) during the reconstruction face of ileocolic resection

No Intervention: Side to side stapled anastomosis

Randomised comparison of handsewn (end-to-end and the Kono-S) with the side-to-side stapled anastomosis. to use a manual anastomosis technique avoiding stapled technique to verify if stapled anastomosis can cause ulcers at endoscopic follow up with systematic overscoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 6 months endoscopic recurrence of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification. [6 months]

    The comparison of 6 months endoscopic recurrence between local and central reading of recordings of endoscopy using the modified Rutgeerts classification.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Morbidity [1 year]

    postoperative morbidity measure

  2. Clinical Recurrence [1 year]

    Clinical and surgical recurrence using Clavien Dindo

  3. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) [1 year]

    Quality of life measured with IBD questionnaire

  4. Hospital Costs [1 year]

    Hospital costs per patient in both groups

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Males and females aged >18 years

  • Ileocolic disease or disease of the neoterminal ileum with an indication for resection

  • Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, and anti-TNF therapy are permitted.

  • All patients should have undergone a colonoscopy and MR enterography (or CT enterography if MR contraindicated) in last 3 months to assess extent of disease.

  • Ability to comply with protocol.

  • Competent and able to provide written informed consent.

  • Patient must have been discussed in the local MDT

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Inability to give informed consent.

  • Patients less than 16 years of age.

  • Patients undergoing repeated ileocolic resection.

  • History of cancer < 5 years which might influence patients prognosis

  • Emergent operation. Pregnant or breast feeding.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 irccs San Raffaele Milan Italy

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • IRCCS San Raffaele

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Vittoria Bellato, Principal Investigator, IRCCS San Raffaele
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05246917
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 5.2
First Posted:
Feb 18, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 31, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Vittoria Bellato, Principal Investigator, IRCCS San Raffaele
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 31, 2022