MeSenteric SpAring Versus High Ligation Ileocolic Resection for the Prevention of REcurrent Crohn's DiseaSe (SPARES)

Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04578392
Collaborator
(none)
181
7
2
89.1
25.9
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Study description - Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to either a high ligation of ileocolic artery or mesenteric sparing ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease. The primary endpoint 6-month endoscopic recurrence.

Endpoints - Primary endpoint; 6 months Secondary endpoints at 1 and 5 years post ileocecal resection

Study population - Adult Crohn's disease patients with medically refractory terminal ileal Crohn's disease undergoing a primary ileocecal resection.

Study sites - Multicenter international study

Description of study intervention - Randomized control trial of two operative techniques Operative approach of a high ligation of ileocolic artery as compared to mesenteric sparing for a primary ileocolic resection

Participate duration - 5 years

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: high ligation of ileocolic artery
  • Procedure: mesenteric sparing
N/A

Detailed Description

There is increasing evidence to suggest that the mesentery may play an active role in the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease. There is significant clinical, endoscopic, and surgical recurrence of disease following ileocolic resection at the site of the anastomosis. The study is seeking to understand if the mesentery plays a role in recurrence following ileocolic resection.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intestinal tract with an unknown etiology and an unknown cure. The characteristic transmural inflammation can progress to refractory inflammatory disease, stricturing disease, and fistulizing disease - all potential indications for surgery when medical management has been exhausted. An important tenant to remember is that surgery is not curative but is rather an adjunct to maximal medical therapy.

One third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) will require a major abdominal resection within 5 years of their diagnosis, and two-thirds will ultimately require operative management at least once during the course of their disease.

Unfortunately, surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative and disease recurrence is common with 62% having endoscopic recurrence at six months, and 80% and 30% of patients having endoscopic and clinical recurrence, respectively, at one year. A third of these patients will require a reoperation at 10 years and up to 80% will require an additional operation by 15 years.This undoubtedly leads to an increased probability of malabsorption syndrome and decreased quality of life.

A significant volume of research has been conducted in attempt to determine how to prevent postoperative recurrence of CD following an ileocolic resection. Some studies have focused on the timing of resuming postoperative medical therapy. Others have looked at surgical technique at the time of ileocolic resection including anatomic configuration of the anastomosis and performing a stapled versus handsewn anastomosis. Various configurations include a side to side anastomosis, end to end, and Kono-S anastomosis. A randomized clinical trial compared a side to side versus an end to end, and found endoscopic recurrence rates were similar in the two groups (42.5% versus 37.9%) at a mean follow up of 11.9 months. A later multi-institution international trial of the Kono S anastomosis determined that the anastomosis was associated with a decreased surgical recurrence rate as compared to conventional anastomoses; 5 and 10 year surgical recurrence-free survival was 98.6%.15 Several Cochrane Database reviews have reported no difference in a stapled versus handsewn anastomosis for an ileocolic resection. Therefore, other than the potential decreased recurrence with the Kono-S anastomosis, no other surgical techniques have altered the postoperative recurrence rate of CD following an ileocolic resection.

Interestingly there is recent evidence to suggest that CD may be a disease of the mesentery rather than just the mucosa of the bowel alone. In CD, the transmural inflammation facilitates increased bacterial translocation into the creeping fat. These translocating antigens and activate adipocytes which are cells than have complex metabolic and immunologic functions. Additionally, it is thought that functional abnormalities in the mesenteric structures exert an inflammatory effect: the secretion of adipokines that have endocrine functions contribute to immunomodulation through a response to afferent signals, neuropeptides, and functional cytokines; mesenteric nerves are involved in the pathogenesis through neuropeptides; and lymphatics in the mesentery may obstruct, remodel, and impair contraction, contributing to the irregularly thickened mesentery seen in CD. Interestingly, the interaction between neuropeptides, adipokines, and vascular and lymphatic endothelia leads to adipose tissue remodeling. This makes the mesentery an active participant in CD, seemingly as much as the bowel itself. However, the mesentery is typically spared, or left in situ, during resection for CD, unlike resections for adenocarinocma of the colon. In adenocarcinoma, a 'high ligation' is performed, where the feeding vessel is taken at its origin in order to take sufficient mesentery and lymph nodes with the colon specimen. However, in operations for CD, the mesentery is spared and typically taken close to the bowel wall despite enlarged lymph nodes and thickened diseased mesentery. A high ligation of the ileocolic artery in order to sample an increased volume of mesentery and lymph nodes to prevent postoperative CD has never been evaluated in a randomized control trial. A recent retrospective study comparing surgical recurrence following a mesenteric sparing versus mesenteric resection approach with ileocecal resection found cumulative reoperation rates were significantly lower in the mesenteric resection group (40% versus 2.9%; p=0.003).

The endoscopic recurrence of CD typically precedes clinical symptoms, and the severity of lesions can predict the subsequent symptomatic course of the disease. Over a four year follow-up period, 100% of patients with severe endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score of i2-i4) developed symptomatic recurrence compared to only 9% of patients with a low score (i0-i1). With such a high rate of endoscopic recurrence, it is thought that post-surgical evaluation should be performed at six months rather than one year when considering adequate early treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
181 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to either a high ligation of ileocolic artery or mesenteric sparing ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease.Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to either a high ligation of ileocolic artery or mesenteric sparing ileocolic resection for terminal ileal Crohn's disease.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
MeSenteric SpAring Versus High Ligation Ileocolic Resection for the Prevention of REcurrent Crohn's DiseaSe (SPARES)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 28, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: high ligation of ileocolic artery

Randomized control trial of two operative techniques Operative approach of a high ligation of ileocolic artery as compared to mesenteric sparing for a primary ileocolic resection

Procedure: high ligation of ileocolic artery
Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to surgery to high ligation or mesenteric sparing

Procedure: mesenteric sparing
Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to surgery to high ligation or mesenteric sparing

Active Comparator: mesenteric sparing for a primary ileocolic resection

Randomized control trial of two operative techniques Operative approach of a high ligation of ileocolic artery as compared to mesenteric sparing for a primary ileocolic resection

Procedure: high ligation of ileocolic artery
Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to surgery to high ligation or mesenteric sparing

Procedure: mesenteric sparing
Patients will be randomized according to post-operative recurrence risk to surgery to high ligation or mesenteric sparing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Endoscopic recurrence based on Rutgeert scoring at the time of colonoscopy [6 months]

    Endoscopic recurrence is define as a Rutgeert score >2 at the time of colonoscopy The score is attributed directly, by selecting the appropriate degree - 5 degrees, from i0 (lowest) to i4 highest, with single-choice selection menu. Rutgeerts score is only be used for evaluation of post-surgical recurrences at ileocolic anastomosis level.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical Recurrence - Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) [6 months, 1 year]

    Clinical Recurrence is defined as an increase in CDAI >100 or CDAI >150 This tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease in order to define response or remission of disease. Remission of Crohn's disease is defined as CDAI below 150. Severe disease was defined as a value of greater than 450. Most major research studies on medications in Crohn's disease define response as a fall of the CDAI of greater than 70 points. (score ranges form 0 to over 600, the higher the score, the higher the disease state)

  2. Endoscopic Recurrence - Rutgeert score [1 year]

    Endoscopic recurrence is define as a score >2 at the time of colonoscopy The score is attributed directly, by selecting the appropriate degree - 5 degrees, from i0 (lowest) to i4 highest, with single-choice selection menu. Rutgeerts score is only be used for evaluation of post-surgical recurrences at ileocolic anastomosis level.

  3. Surgical Recurrence [1 and 5 years]

    Surgical recurrence is define as need for repeat ileocolic resection due to recurrence at anastomotic site

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Males and females 18-65 years of age.

  • Isolated ileocolic Crohn's disease of <30 cm in length

  • Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab therapy are permitted.

  • Ability to comply with protocol

  • Competent and able to provide written informed consent

  • Medically refractory disease or inability to tolerate ongoing medical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:Inability to give informed consent.

  • Patients less than 18 years of age

  • Patients undergoing repeat ileocolic resection

  • Patients with concurrent disease in other locations (e.g. proximal stricturing of the small bowel, fistulizing disease to the sigmoid colon) requiring an additional intervention in the operating room beyond an ileocolic resection.

  • Patients with >30 cm of terminal ileal disease

  • Patients who are undergoing an ileal resection only (NOT ileocecal) because the disease spares the distal most aspect of ileum and ileocecal valve

  • Patient whose anastomosis is diverted intra-operatively with a loop or end ileostomy

  • Clinically significant medical conditions within the six months before surgery: e.g. myocardial infarction, active angina, congestive heart failure or other conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, compromise the safety of the patient.

  • Specific exclusions; Evidence of hepatitis B, C, or HIV

  • History of cancer including melanoma (with the exception of localized skin cancers)

  • Emergent indication for an operation

  • Pregnant or breast feeding.

  • History of clinically significant auto-immunity (other than Crohn's disease) or any previous example of fat-directed autoimmunity

  • Inability to follow up at respective sites for the primary endpoint

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Cedars-Sinai Hospital System Los Angeles California United States 90048
2 Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California United States 94305
3 Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston Florida United States 33331
4 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
5 Mt. Sinai Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 1X5
6 Humanitas Rozzano Milano Italy 20089
7 St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institution Harrow Middlesex United Kingdom HA1 3UJ

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The Cleveland Clinic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy Lightner, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Amy Lightner, Associate Professor of Surgery in the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery at Cleveland Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04578392
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 20-139
First Posted:
Oct 8, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Apr 5, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Amy Lightner, Associate Professor of Surgery in the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery at Cleveland Clinic, The Cleveland Clinic
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 5, 2022