SALVPROST: SCAP vs HIFU for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy

Sponsor
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05044754
Collaborator
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba (Other), Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío (Other), Institut Universitaire du Cancer - Oncopole. Toulose. France (Other)
50
4
36
12.5
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The evidence base relating to the use of SCAP and HIFU is poor, with significant uncertainties relating to long-term oncological outcomes. One of the main limitations when the few studies reported are analyzed is the lack of information about the histopathology both before starting treatment and at the time of recurrence after cryotherapy. The vast majority of studies refer only to BCR-free survival as end point, thus limiting interpretation of real oncological performance of this technique. Furthermore, side effects vary widely from study to study and there are uncertainties about the real morbidity associated to cryotherapy in the salvage setting.

Another important hot issue in this scenario is the potential benefit that new imaging and diagnosis techniques (MRI, targeted biopsy, PSMA) may add for a more accurate indication. This could provide the possibility of better results for SCAP. The clinical value of this new diagnostic tools is unknown in this scenario and needs to be explored.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Local treatment of the prostate (SCAP or HIFU)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Salvage Cryoablation of the Prostate (SCAP) vs High Intensity Focal Ultrasounds (HIFU) for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
SCAP

Patients with recurrent prostate cancer undergoing SCAP

Procedure: Local treatment of the prostate (SCAP or HIFU)
Once the local involvement of the recurrent prostate cancer is confirmed, patient will undergo local treatment of the prostate (SCAP or HIFU)

HIFU

Patients with recurrent prostate cancer undergoing HIFU

Procedure: Local treatment of the prostate (SCAP or HIFU)
Once the local involvement of the recurrent prostate cancer is confirmed, patient will undergo local treatment of the prostate (SCAP or HIFU)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. DFS-histology [1 year]

    Disease free survival (confirmed by follow-up biopsy)

  2. DFS-image [1 year]

    Disease free survival (confirmed by follow-up PET-CT )

  3. ADT-FS [5 years]

    Androgen deprivation therapy free survival.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. BCR free survival [5 years]

    Time free of biochemical recurrence (PSA)

  2. MFS-PET [5 years f-u]

    Metastasis free survival. rate of patients without any metastasis detected on PET-CT.

  3. Complications rate [1 year]

    Rate of early and long-term complications

  4. Continence [1 year]

    Change in continence scores (ICIQ-SF q)

  5. Sexual function [1 year]

    Changes in sexual function (IIEF questionanaire)

  6. Low urinary tract function [1 year]

    Changes in IPSS questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with local recurrence (with histological confirmation) after treatment with radiotherapy or brachytherapy without evidence of distant involvement evaluated preferably with PET/PSMA (if not available then Fluciclovine PET/CT or choline PET/CT must be performed).

  • Life expectancy >10 years

  • Prostate volume < 100cc

  • PSA<10 ng/mL

  • mpMRI + fusion/systematic biopsy (template suppl 1) o mpMRI ≤cT3a without affecting the bladder neck or the membranous urethra so that the continence mechanisms of the sphincter are not compromised.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with clinically confirmed distant metastasis

  • Any previous major rectal surgery

  • Clinically significant lower urinary tract or rectal anomalies

  • Existing urethral, rectal, or bladder fistulae

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse France
2 Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía Córdoba Andalucía Spain
3 Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves Granada Andalucía Spain
4 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Seville Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
  • Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer - Oncopole. Toulose. France

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ignacio Puche-Sanz, MD, PhD, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
  • Principal Investigator: Enrique Gomez-Gomez, MD, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Ignacio Puche Sanz, MD PhD Urologist, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05044754
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SALVPROST-YAU-21
First Posted:
Sep 16, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Sep 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 16, 2021