Use of an Herbal Preparation to Prevent and Dissolve Kidney Stones

Sponsor
Mayo Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00381849
Collaborator
Himalaya Herbal Healthcare (Other), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (NIH)
20
1
3
50
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

We will investigate the safety and effectiveness of a mixture of 9 east Indian herbs known as Cystone regarding their ability to dissolve existing kidney stones and prevent formation of new ones. Cystine and calcium stone formers will be recruited for a 59 week trial. The first phase of the study will be two 6 weeks periods during which each subject will receive Cystone or placebo in random order (with a one-week wash out between 6 week treatment periods). The remaining 46 weeks, each subject will receive Cystone. End points are changes in urinary chemistries and stone burden by Computerized Tomography (CT) scanning.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 1/Phase 2

Detailed Description

Cystone will be used in proven cystine and calcium stone forming adults who are not pregnant. Subjects must have a measurable stone by CT. The first phase is a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled cross-over of Cystone and placebo for 6 weeks each separated by a 1 week washout. Entry, 6 and 12 week 24 hour urine supersaturations or cystine, pH and sodium determinations will be collected. Then all patients enter an open label phase of 46 weeks, ensuring a 52-week total exposure to Cystone during the 59 week study. Baseline and 1 year stone quantification CT scans will be performed. End points will be changes in urine chemistry/supersaturation and stone burden. Stone burden was measured by CT, quantitatively for stone density and volume. All CT images were also reviewed in a blinded fashion by a radiologist to score each kidney as increased, no change or decreased stone burden.

Statistics and Randomization: Randomization was accomplished using a table provided by the department of statistics to the study coordinator who was blinded as to whether the patients received placebo or Cystone®. Biochemical and supersaturation results were analyzed via a matched pair analysis using the JMP software package (SAS Instituted, Inc.); P values < 0.05 were deemed significant.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cystone for Treatment of Nephrolithiasis
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Cystone then sugar pill

Subject will take Cystone for 6 weeks, then have a 1 week wash out period followed by the sugar pill for another 6 weeks

Drug: Cystone
Participants will take 2 pills, 2 times a day. Each tablet of Cystone contains: Shilapushpha (Didymocarpus pedicellata) 130 mg, Pasanabheda (Saxifraga ligulata Syn. Bergenia ligulata/cilata) 98 mg, Indian madder/ Manjishtha (Rubia cordifolia) 32 mg, Umbrella's edge/ Nagarmusta (Cyperus scariosus) 32 mg, Prickly chaff flower/ Apamarga (Achyranthes aspera) 32 mg, Sedge/ Gojiha (Onosma bracteatum) 32 mg, Purple fleabane/ Sahadeve (Veronoia Cinerea) 32 mg, Lime silicate calx/ Hajrul yahood Bhasma/ Badrashma bhasma) 32 mg, Shilajit 26 mg.
Other Names:
  • Uricare
  • Drug: Sugar Pill (Placebo)
    Participants will take 2 pills, 2 times a day for 6 weeks.

    Placebo Comparator: Sugar pill then Cystone

    Subject will take sugar pill for 6 weeks, then a 1 week wash out followed by the Cystone for another 6 weeks

    Drug: Cystone
    Participants will take 2 pills, 2 times a day. Each tablet of Cystone contains: Shilapushpha (Didymocarpus pedicellata) 130 mg, Pasanabheda (Saxifraga ligulata Syn. Bergenia ligulata/cilata) 98 mg, Indian madder/ Manjishtha (Rubia cordifolia) 32 mg, Umbrella's edge/ Nagarmusta (Cyperus scariosus) 32 mg, Prickly chaff flower/ Apamarga (Achyranthes aspera) 32 mg, Sedge/ Gojiha (Onosma bracteatum) 32 mg, Purple fleabane/ Sahadeve (Veronoia Cinerea) 32 mg, Lime silicate calx/ Hajrul yahood Bhasma/ Badrashma bhasma) 32 mg, Shilajit 26 mg.
    Other Names:
  • Uricare
  • Drug: Sugar Pill (Placebo)
    Participants will take 2 pills, 2 times a day for 6 weeks.

    Experimental: Open-label Cystone

    All subjects will receive Cystone for 46 weeks in the open-label period.

    Drug: Cystone
    Participants will take 2 pills, 2 times a day. Each tablet of Cystone contains: Shilapushpha (Didymocarpus pedicellata) 130 mg, Pasanabheda (Saxifraga ligulata Syn. Bergenia ligulata/cilata) 98 mg, Indian madder/ Manjishtha (Rubia cordifolia) 32 mg, Umbrella's edge/ Nagarmusta (Cyperus scariosus) 32 mg, Prickly chaff flower/ Apamarga (Achyranthes aspera) 32 mg, Sedge/ Gojiha (Onosma bracteatum) 32 mg, Purple fleabane/ Sahadeve (Veronoia Cinerea) 32 mg, Lime silicate calx/ Hajrul yahood Bhasma/ Badrashma bhasma) 32 mg, Shilajit 26 mg.
    Other Names:
  • Uricare
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Oxalate (CaOx) [baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment]

      Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.

    2. 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Phosphate (Brushite) [baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment]

      Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.

    3. 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Phosphate (Hydroxyapatite) [baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment]

      Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.

    4. 24 Hour Urinary Cystine Excretion [baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment]

    5. Stone Density as Measured by Agatston Score Via Computerized Tomography [Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline]

      Agatston results are a measure of calcium typically used for measuring coronary artery calcification.

    6. Volume of Kidney Stones as Measured on Computerized Tomography [Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline]

      Measurement of kidney stone volume in cubic millimeters.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Stone Burden as Assessed by Radiologist at One Year [Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline]

      Stone burden will be quantitated using the stone quantification protocol currently available at Mayo that quantitates kidney stones both by volume and by density measured in Agatston units.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 100 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Written informed consent In the cystine arm, all patients will have the diagnosis of cystinuria, made on the basis of a 24-hour urine cystine containing more than 1500 umol of cystine, or a stone compositional analysis of cystine

    • Presence of an existing cystine stone in one or both kidneys In the calcium arm, all patients will have a history of a calcium stone as determined by laboratory analysis.

    • Medically effective birth control if fertile female

    • Able to comply with protocol

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnant

    • Subjects under age 18 years

    • Obstructing stones

    • Urinary Tract Infection that cannot be cleared with single course of antibiotic

    • Subjects who decline to provide informed consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Mayo Clinic
    • Himalaya Herbal Healthcare
    • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Stephen B. Erickson, M.D., Mayo Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Stephen B. Erickson, M.D., PI, Mayo Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00381849
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2115-05
    • P50DK083007
    First Posted:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 4, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Keywords provided by Stephen B. Erickson, M.D., PI, Mayo Clinic
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Patients with recurring and analytically confirmed kidney stones were recruited from the Mayo Stone Clinic in Rochester, MN.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Period Title: First Intervention
    STARTED 10 10
    COMPLETED 10 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: First Intervention
    STARTED 10 10
    COMPLETED 10 9
    NOT COMPLETED 0 1
    Period Title: First Intervention
    STARTED 10 9
    COMPLETED 10 9
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0
    Period Title: First Intervention
    STARTED 10 9
    COMPLETED 10 9
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects Total
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s) Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 10 10 20
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    8
    80%
    9
    90%
    17
    85%
    >=65 years
    2
    20%
    1
    10%
    3
    15%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    6
    60%
    4
    40%
    10
    50%
    Male
    4
    40%
    6
    60%
    10
    50%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    10
    100%
    10
    100%
    20
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Oxalate (CaOx)
    Description Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.
    Time Frame baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    CaOx was not analyzed for the Cystine Stone subjects.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 10 0
    CaOx at Baseline
    1.83
    (0.28)
    CaOx after placebo (6 wks)
    1.83
    (0.42)
    CaOx after Cystone (6 wks)
    1.87
    (0.43)
    CaOx at end of Cystone (46 weeks)
    1.78
    (0.47)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of CaOx between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of CaOx between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.23
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of CaOx between six weeks' treatment on cystone and 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.41
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of CaOx between baseline and after 46 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.32
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Phosphate (Brushite)
    Description Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.
    Time Frame baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Brushite was not analyzed for the Cystine Stone subjects.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 10 0
    Brushite at Baseline
    0.35
    (1.04)
    Brushite after placebo (6 wks)
    0.73
    (0.83)
    Brushite after Cystone (6 wks)
    0.38
    (0.98)
    Brushite at end of Cystone (46 weeks)
    0.09
    (1.29)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of Brushite between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.49
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of Brushite between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.64
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of Brushite between six weeks' treatment on cystone and 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.72
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for supersaturation of Brushite between baseline and after 46 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.84
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title 24 Hour Urine Supersaturation of Calcium Phosphate (Hydroxyapatite)
    Description Urine is often supersaturated, which favors precipitation of crystalline phases such as calcium oxalate. However, crystals do not always form in supersaturated urine because supersaturation is balanced by crystallization inhibitors that are also present. Supersaturation is calculated by measuring the concentration of all the ions that can interact. Once these concentrations are known, a computer program can calculate the theoretical supersaturation with respect to the important crystalline phases, eg, calcium oxalate.
    Time Frame baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Hydroxyapatite was not analyzed for the Cystine Stone subjects.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 10 0
    Hydroxyapatite at Baseline
    4.25
    (2.02)
    Hydroxyapatite after placebo (6 wks)
    5.03
    (1.23)
    Hydroxyapatite after Cystone (6 wks)
    4.65
    (1.86)
    Hydroxyapatite at end of Cystone (46 weeks)
    4.09
    (2.06)
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Stone Burden as Assessed by Radiologist at One Year
    Description Stone burden will be quantitated using the stone quantification protocol currently available at Mayo that quantitates kidney stones both by volume and by density measured in Agatston units.
    Time Frame Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    One subject in the Calcium group was excluded from the CT analysis because of bilateral stone removal surgery during the study.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 9 9
    Right kidney no change in stone burden
    6
    7
    Right kidney stone burden increased
    2
    2
    Right kidney stone burden decreased
    1
    0
    Left kidney no change in stone burden
    2
    2
    Left kidney stone burden increased
    6
    5
    Left kidney stone burden decreased
    1
    2
    5. Primary Outcome
    Title 24 Hour Urinary Cystine Excretion
    Description
    Time Frame baseline, after 6 weeks treatment on placebo, after 6 weeks treatment on cystone, at end of 46 weeks of open label cystone treatment

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Cystine excretion was not applicable to the Calcium Stone subjects.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 0 10
    Cystine at Baseline
    2770
    (947)
    Cystine after placebo (6 wks)
    3183
    (1898)
    Cystine after Cystone (6 wks)
    2948
    (2021)
    Cystine at end of Cystone (46 weeks)
    4140
    (2398)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for urinary cystine between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.69
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for urinary cystine between baseline and after 6 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.25
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for urinary cystine between six weeks' treatment on cystone and 6 weeks' treatment on placebo.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.15
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Paired t test for urinary cystine between baseline and after 46 weeks' treatment on cystone.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.20
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    6. Primary Outcome
    Title Stone Density as Measured by Agatston Score Via Computerized Tomography
    Description Agatston results are a measure of calcium typically used for measuring coronary artery calcification.
    Time Frame Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    One subject was excluded from CT analysis because of bilateral stone removal surgery during the study
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 9 10
    Baseline Right Kidney Agatston Score
    49.75
    (60.24)
    2,107
    (4,417)
    52 week Right Kidney Agatston Score
    56.13
    (74.23)
    2,183
    (4,157)
    Baseline Left Kidney Agatston Score
    166.13
    (143.16)
    383
    (560)
    52 week Left Kidney Agatston Score
    247.71
    (371.46)
    1,801
    (2,741)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Right Kidney Stone Density; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.85
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Left Kidney Stone Density; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.63
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Right Kidney Stone Density; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.97
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Left Kidney Stone Density; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.15
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Volume of Kidney Stones as Measured on Computerized Tomography
    Description Measurement of kidney stone volume in cubic millimeters.
    Time Frame Baseline, approximately 52 weeks after baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    One subject was excluded from CT analysis because of bilateral stone removal surgery during the study.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    Measure Participants 9 10
    Baseline Right Kidney Stone Volume
    45.5
    (52.03)
    1,602
    (3,335)
    52 Week Right Kidney Stone Volume
    52.75
    (66.44)
    1,677
    (3,139)
    Baseline Left Kidney Stone Volume
    141.25
    (198.98)
    301
    (422)
    52 Week Left Kidney Stone Volume
    174.25
    (265.73)
    2,064
    (688)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Right Kidney Stone Volume; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.81
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Calcium Stone Subjects
    Comments Left Kidney Stone Volume; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.78
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Right Kidney Stone Volume; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.96
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Cystine Stone Subjects
    Comments Left Kidney Stone Volume; P-value comparing one year to baseline
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.13
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 1 year
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Subject self reported any adverse effects.
    Arm/Group Title Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Arm/Group Description Subjects with confirmed calcium kidney stone(s) Subjects with confirmed cystine kidney stone(s)
    All Cause Mortality
    Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Calcium Stone Subjects Cystine Stone Subjects
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    There were no serious adverse events and no adverse events. Power of the study was diminished by failure of patients to return all required 24 hour urine samples. The botanical authenticity of Cystone was not documented.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Beverly Tietje, Study Coordinator
    Organization Mayo Clinic
    Phone 507-255-0401
    Email tietje.beverly@mayo.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Stephen B. Erickson, M.D., PI, Mayo Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00381849
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2115-05
    • P50DK083007
    First Posted:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 4, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2016