The DAShED (Diagnosis of Aortic Syndrome in the ED) Study

Sponsor
NHS Lothian (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05582967
Collaborator
University of Edinburgh (Other)
5,000
25
3.2
200
63.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening emergency condition affecting the upper aorta affecting ~4000 people in the (United Kingdom; UK) a year with an ED misdiagnosis rate as high as 38%. Previous research has identified several strategies combining clinical probability scoring with blood tests (D-Dimer) to rule out the condition but when applied to a large population (ED) with relatively low numbers of actual cases, these result in a high rate of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) scanning. Current guidelines reflect the uncertainty of existing evidence.

This study, the first phase of three, aims to describe the characteristics of ED attendances with possible AAS, to determine the service implications of using different diagnostic strategies and inform future research. The investigators plan to recruit all ED attendances with possible AAS over a 1-4 week period. The investigators plan a prospective and retrospective approach to data collection adopting a waived-consent strategy with endpoint measures describing the characteristics of patients presenting with possible AAS.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Completion of focused Electronic Case Report Form

Detailed Description

AAS is a life-threatening emergency condition which presents to the ED. Around 4,000 people suffer per year in the UK [1], many not receiving timely diagnosis and treatment. 25% of patients are not diagnosed until 24 hours after arriving in the ED due to the varied nature of presentation [2]. Chest pain is the most common presenting symptom of AAS (80%) although back pain (40%) and abdominal pain are not uncommon [1]. These symptoms account for over 2 million ED attendances per year in England [National Health Service; NHS Digital A&E 2021] and are overwhelmingly due to causes other than AAS. The estimated incidence of AAS is 1 in every 980 ED attendances with atraumatic chest pain [3], thus creating a substantial diagnostic challenge.

Prognosis is best when patients are treated early, and mortality increases 2% per hour of delay. [4] The misdiagnosis rate during the initial ED visit for AAS is estimated to be between 1 in 3 to 1 in 7 AASs [5], leading to worse outcomes [6,7] whilst CTA over testing leads to diagnostic yields as low as 2-3%. [2,8]. CTA scanning of the aorta has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AAS, but an unrestricted CT strategy will incur significant costs, has ionising radiation risks, resource implications, CT delays for non-AAS patients and the burden of 'incidentalomas'.

Clinicians therefore need to use CTA selectively but there is no validated scoring system to help this decision. Several have been proposed [1, 9-14] including the ADD-RS score, the Canadian clinical practice guideline Clinical Decision Aid [13], the AORTAs score [14] and the Sheffield score [unpublished]. D-Dimer has been suggested as a rule-out biomarker in low pre-test probability patients (95-98% sensitivity) [15,16] and has been incorporated into the Aortic Dissection Detection-Risk Stratification (ADD-RS) score to reduce CTA rate in low pre-test probability patients. None have been studied in truly undifferentiated ED populations, or in the UK where CTA threshold is different compared to North America. It is currently unclear whether any have sufficient sensitivity to be acceptable to clinicians, which is the most accurate, and whether they are likely to lead to CTA and D-Dimer over testing. Assessment of CTA rate and CT positivity has also not previously been studied. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine has recently released a national guideline advocating any patient with an ADD-RS score of >=1 (no D-dimer incorporated) should have a CT aorta performed (unless other cause for symptoms identified and evidenced). The recommendation is not based on UK-validated clinical evidence, however, and clinical impacts of the recommendation are yet to be seen.

In view of these diagnostic challenges, the investigators aim in our programme of work to ultimately to assess which of the four aforementioned clinical decision tools is most effective, assess external validity, and assess clinical impact. This study (Phase 1; DAShED) will involve prospective data collection on all characteristics of four different risk scores, in addition to evaluation of patient characteristics, potential CT aorta rates with different strategies, and enrolment rates at participating sites. This will inform Phase 2, which will involve full interventional external validation study of the decision aid(s) selected in Phase 1 (including biomarker collection); the main objective being to select the score to subject to assessment of clinical impact (intervention step-wedge trial) in Phase 3.

This is an observational cohort study of all people attending the ED with symptoms of possible AAS, including new-onset chest, back or abdominal pain, syncope or symptoms related to malperfusion.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
5000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
An Observational Cohort Study of People Attending the ED With Symptoms of Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS)
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 26, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Enrolment rate at each participating site [30 days]

    Number of participants during study period enrolled

  2. Proportion of patients in whom the ED clinician thinks Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) is a possible differential who have confirmed AAS [30 days]

    Proportion of patients in whom the ED clinician thinks Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) is a possible differential who have confirmed AAS

  3. Proportion of patients in whom ED clinician considers AAS NOT a possible differential who had confirmed AAS [30 days]

    Proportion of patients in whom ED clinician considers AAS NOT a possible differential who had confirmed AAS

  4. Number of AAS patients not enrolled due to lack of clinical/research support [30 days]

    Number of AAS patients not enrolled due to lack of clinical/research support

  5. CT angiogram (CTA) ordering and positivity rate [30 days]

    Number of CT angiograms ordered and the proportion that are positive scans

  6. Test characteristics of clinical acumen [30 days]

    Test characteristics of clinical acumen (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  7. Test characteristics of ADD-RS (Aortic Dissection Detection-Risk Score) [30 days]

    Test characteristics of Aortic Dissection Detection-Risk Score (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  8. Test characteristics Aorta score [30 days]

    Test characteristics of Aorta score (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  9. Test characteristics of Canadian guideline score [30 days]

    Test characteristics of Canadian guideline score (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  10. Test characteristics of Sheffield AAS decision rule [30 days]

    Test characteristics of Sheffield AAS decision rule (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  11. Test characteristics of D-dimer [30 days]

    Test characteristics of D-dimer (i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)

  12. Median time from hospital presentation to imaging diagnosis and median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation (hours) [30 days]

    Median time from hospital presentation to imaging diagnosis and median time from symptom onset to hospital presentation (hours)

  13. 30-day mortality in proven AAS [30 days]

    30-day mortality in proven AAS

  14. Proportion of alternative diagnoses found on CTA and final hospital diagnosis [30 days]

    Proportion of alternative diagnoses found on CTA and final hospital diagnosis

  15. Number of patients not able to be enrolled with reason why not enrolled [30 days]

    Number of patients not able to be enrolled with reason why not enrolled

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
16 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • People attending the ED with symptoms of AAS, including those with new-onset chest, back or abdominal pain, syncope or symptoms related to malperfusion.

  • ≥16 years old

Exclusion Criteria:
  • No symptoms of AAS.

  • <16 years old

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Royal United Hospital Bath United Kingdom
2 Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom
3 North Bristol NHS Trust Bristol United Kingdom
4 Addenbrookes hospital Cambridge United Kingdom
5 Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom
6 St Johns Hospital Edinburgh United Kingdom
7 Frimley Health Frimley United Kingdom
8 Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow United Kingdom
9 Royal Alexandra Hospital Glasgow United Kingdom
10 James Paget University Hospital Great Yarmouth United Kingdom
11 Harrogate Harrogate United Kingdom
12 Raigmore Inverness United Kingdom
13 Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust King's Lynn United Kingdom
14 Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy United Kingdom
15 Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust Lewisham United Kingdom
16 Luton & Dunstable University Hospital Luton United Kingdom
17 Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester United Kingdom
18 Milton Keynes Universoty Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Milton Keynes United Kingdom
19 Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle United Kingdom
20 Royal Oldham Hospital Oldham United Kingdom
21 John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford United Kingdom
22 Royal Glamorgan Hospital Pontyclun United Kingdom
23 Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust Reading United Kingdom
24 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield United Kingdom
25 Wexham Park Slough United Kingdom

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • NHS Lothian
  • University of Edinburgh

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel McLatchie, Accord Clinical Research

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
NHS Lothian
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05582967
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AC22083
  • 22/PR/0807
  • 315948
First Posted:
Oct 17, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Oct 17, 2022
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by NHS Lothian
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 17, 2022