EBMeDS: Evidence-Based Medicine Electronic Decision Support Study

Sponsor
Tampere University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00915304
Collaborator
The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim (Other), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (Other), Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd. (Industry), ProWellness Ltd. (Other), The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES) (Other)
12,101
1
20
603.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the Evidence-Based Medicine electronic Decision Support (EBMeDS) automatic reminders in primary health care.

Hypothesis (1)is that in the intervention group the total number of EBMeDS reminders will decrease compared to the control group.

Hypothesis (2) is that in the intervention group the quality measures will increase faster compared to the control group at follow-up time.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: The EBMeDS reminders
Phase 1/Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
12101 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Patient Specific Automatic Reminders in Primary Care - the EBMeDS Randomised Trial
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2011

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The number of reminders triggered (in relation to the number of eligible patients, Ri/Ni) during repeated Virtual Health Checks (VHCs) [Follow-up time max one and half year]

    VHC will be performed once a week for the whole study population, beginning at baseline and before randomisation. The main outcome measure is Ri/Ni at follow-up time after commencement of the study where Ri is the total number of reminders triggered by the patient record data in intervention and in control group at the time of analysis, and Ni is the total number of patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Specific clinical measures compared to an intervention and a control group []

    Clinical measures as mean values of laboratory parameters, for example a mean level of HbA1c, a mean level of total cholesterol.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All residents of Sipoo who have patient ID number in the Mediatri electronic patient record system in Sipoo Health Centre
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Those residents who's occupational health care is produced by Sipoo Health Centre

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Tampere; School of Health Sciences Tampere Finland 33014

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Tampere University
  • The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
  • Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd.
  • ProWellness Ltd.
  • The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pekka Rissanen, Professor, University of Tampere; School of Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Tiina Kortteisto, MSc, University of Tampere; School of Health Sciences

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Tiina Kortteisto, researcher, Tampere University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00915304
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EBMeDS-40344-06
First Posted:
Jun 8, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Dec 18, 2012
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2012
Keywords provided by Tiina Kortteisto, researcher, Tampere University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 18, 2012