QUICK: Comparison of Intraosseous Anaesthesia Using a Computerized System (QuickSleeper) to Conventional Anesthesia

Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02084433
Collaborator
(none)
158
1
2
25
6.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose is to compare the efficacy of an intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system (QuickSleeper) to a conventional infiltration anesthesia. Our hypothesis is that anesthesia via QuickSleeper system can reduce pain during anesthesia and obtain a more rapid local anesthesia compared to the anesthesia via conventional technique by infiltration.

Design: split-mouth design AND parallel-arm design

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system
  • Procedure: conventional anasthesia
N/A

Detailed Description

Local anesthesia is commonly used in oral health care and intra-mucosal infiltration anesthesia is most commonly used by practitioners. Anesthesia may cause children a great deal of anxiety because of the fear of the injection. The latter can be painful if the product is delivered too quickly in the mucosa. Recent developments in the techniques and anesthesia systems allow reducing pain during the injection. In particular, computerized systems (electronically assisted local anesthesia) allow a slow injection limiting pressure. Moreover, these systems look like a pen which prevents the negative impression of the image related to the syringe metal. The intraosseous electronically-assisted anesthesia could be an interesting alternative to conventional infiltration anesthesia by making the act less stressful but also less painful for the child.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
158 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Intraosseous Anaesthesia Using a Computerized System (QuickSleeper) to Conventional Anesthesia
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional anasthesia

para-apical maxillary and locoregional mandibular (Articaine 1/100000) anaesthesia

Procedure: conventional anasthesia
para-apical maxillary and locoregional mandibular (Articaine 1/100000) anaesthesia

Experimental: intraosseous anaesthesia

intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system (Quicksleeper) "1 / Anesthesia of periosteum (Articaine 1/100000) 2 / penetration of the needle rotated to the apex 3 / osteocentral injection "

Procedure: intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system
"1 / Anesthesia of periosteum (Articaine 1/100000) 2 / penetration of the needle rotated to the apex 3 / osteocentral injection "

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain reported by the patient according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) [up to 10 minutes]

    Pain reported by the patient according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) will be evaluated at the end of the injection / infiltration. The assessment will concern the insertion of the needle and the injection / infiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. latency [up to 15 minutes]

    latency (in minutes) evaluated by examining the sensitivity of the sulcus using a probe (an exam will be conducted every minute until the sulcus is insensitive to the probe)

  2. need for additional anesthesia during the treatment [1 hour]

  3. pain felt during the treatment [1 hour]

    need for additional anesthesia during the treatment; pain felt during the treatment evaluated at the end of treatment according to the VAS

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
7 Years to 15 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • split-mouth randomized controlled trial: patients with at least two first permanent molars requiring the same treatment with anesthesia

  • parallel-arm radnomized controlled trial: patients with first permanent molar requiring treatment with anesthesia

  • vital pulp

  • patient did not take any pain medication 48 hours before randomization

  • non-opposition of the child and two holders of parental participation in the study

  • Treatments can be conservative treatment or endodontic treatment limited to pulpotomy.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with periodontal disease (periodontal pockets or tooth mobility) or radiological defects (necrosis, furcation or periapical radiolucency)

  • Disabled or autistic patients

  • Patients with cancer, heart disease or sickle cell anemia

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hôpital Bretonneau Paris France 75018

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frédéric Courson, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Frederic COURSON, assistant professor, hospital practitionner, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02084433
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 75018
First Posted:
Mar 12, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Feb 23, 2017
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2017
Keywords provided by Frederic COURSON, assistant professor, hospital practitionner, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 23, 2017