SEFICU: Spectral Edge Frequency From Spectral EEG Analysis to Guide Deep Sedation in the Critical Care Setting (Pilot)

Sponsor
University of Chile (Other)
Overall Status
Suspended
CT.gov ID
NCT04026451
Collaborator
(none)
20
2
2
24.7
10
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) have pain, anxiety, sleep deprivation and agitation. The use of analgesics and sedatives drugs (sedoanalgesia) is a common practice to produce pain relief and comfort during the VM. Despite its usefulness, it has been documented that the excessive use of sedatives is associated with an increased risk of prolonging the stay under MV and in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). To avoid this, current evidence suggests the use of protocols guided to clinical goals, such as the sedation-agitation scale (SAS), or daily suspension of infusions to avoid excess sedation. These protocols minimize the prescription of deep sedation, which is still necessary for 20-30% of patients.

Monitoring of sedation with electroencephalography in the ICU has been underutilized. In fact, only the use of indices that are generated from algorithms of the electroencephalographic signal processing has been reported. However, it has been shown that the use of these monitoring systems does not benefit the heterogeneous groups of patients in MV. Currently, the clinical monitors used to measure the effect of drugs used in a sedoanalgesia show in the screen the spectrogram of the brain electrical signal and quantify the frequency under which 95% of the electroencephalographic power is located, known as spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95). This value in a person who is conscious is usually greater than 20 Hz, in a patient undergoing general anesthesia it is between 10 and 15 Hz. In preliminary measurements, in deeply sedated patients in the ICU, SEF95 values are under 5 Hz. This would indicate that patients in the ICU are being overdosed. It is unknown if in cases with an indication of deep sedation, the use of monitoring by spectrogram is superior to the standard management guided at clinical scales, such as SAS.

Therefore, the investigators propose the following hypothesis: In patients with an appropriate indication of deep sedation (SAS 1-2), the sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 reduces the consumption of propofol compared to the deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation scale agitation in MV patients in the ICU maintaining a clinically adequate level of sedation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Sedation guided by SEF95 (10-13 Hz) from SedLine® monitor
  • Behavioral: Sedation guided by SAS scale (1-2)
  • Drug: Deep sedation with propofol andfentanyl
  • Procedure: Mechanical Ventilation
N/A

Detailed Description

To determine whether deep sedoanalgesia guided by the spectral edge frequency 95 decreases propofol consumption with respect to deep sedoanalgesia guided by the sedation-agitation scale in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit under mechanical ventilation.

  • Group intervention: sedation will be guided by SEF95 and SAS. Patients will be sedated to keep a SAS 1-2 with a SEF95 between 10 to 13 Hz.

  • Group control: sedation will be guided by SAS. However, SEF95 will be also recorded but covered.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Use of Spectral Analysis of Electroencephalographic Activity to Guide Deep Sedoanalgesia and Its Effect on Propofol Consumption in Patients Hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 11, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SEF95 obtained by SedLine® monitor to keep a SAS 1-2. The target of SEF95 will be 10-13 Hz to keep SAS 1-2.

Device: Sedation guided by SEF95 (10-13 Hz) from SedLine® monitor
Dosage of propofol and fentanyl will be guided by SEF95 value between 10-13 Hz. If SEF95 is lower than 10 Hz, the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be diminished; if SEF95 is higher than 13 Hz, the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be increased; and if SEF95 is between 10-13 Hz, then the infusion rate will be kept.

Behavioral: Sedation guided by SAS scale (1-2)
Dosage of propofol and fentanyl will be guided by SAS to keep a value of 1-2. If SAS is higher than 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be increased; and if SAS is 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be maintained.

Drug: Deep sedation with propofol andfentanyl
Propofol and fentanyl will be infused to reach a score in the SAS of 1-2

Procedure: Mechanical Ventilation
Critically ill patients will be ventilated mechanically following the clinical indication.

Active Comparator: Control

Critical care patients with an indication of deep sedation and mechanical ventilation will be sedated with an infusion of propofol and fentanyl guided by SAS (1-2). SedLine® monitor will be also used in these patients but the screen will be covered.

Behavioral: Sedation guided by SAS scale (1-2)
Dosage of propofol and fentanyl will be guided by SAS to keep a value of 1-2. If SAS is higher than 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be increased; and if SAS is 1-2, then the infusion rate of propofol and fentanyl will be maintained.

Drug: Deep sedation with propofol andfentanyl
Propofol and fentanyl will be infused to reach a score in the SAS of 1-2

Procedure: Mechanical Ventilation
Critically ill patients will be ventilated mechanically following the clinical indication.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Plasma concentration of propofol [48 hours]

    It will be measured using HPLC

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Total dose of propofol [Each 2 hours for 48 hours]

    In mg

  2. Total dose of fentanyl [Each 2 hours for 48 hours]

    In mcg

  3. SAS (Sedation Agitation Scale) [Each 2 hours for 48 hours]

    The scale evaluates sedation and agitation of a patient, thus the name is "Sedation Agitation Scale". The total range goes from 1 to 7, where: 1 is Unarousable, 2 is Very Sedated, 3 is Sedated, 4 is Calm and Cooperative, 5 is Agitated, 6 is Very Agitated, and 7 is Dangerous Agitation. If clinical indication is a deep sedation, then the patient must reach a SAS 1-2. If clinical indication is a light sedation, then the patient must reach a SAS 3-4. Scores of 5, 6 and 7 must be avoided with drugs.

  4. SEF95 [Each 2 hours for 48 hours]

    Spectral Edge Frequency 95

  5. Mean Arterial Pressure [Each 2 hours for 48 hours]

    In mmHg

  6. Plasma triglyceride levels [24 hours and 48 hours]

    Central laboratory

  7. Plasma lactate concentration [24 hours and 48 hours]

    Central laboratory

  8. Duration of mechanical ventilation [Up to 30 days]

    Since the beginning of the protocol

  9. Stay in intensive unit care [Up to 30 days]

    Since the beginning of the protocol

  10. Wake up after stopping the infusion of propofol [Up to 48 hours]

  11. Delirium [Up to 10 days]

    Evaluated with CAM-ICU twice a day during the stay in ICU

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Older than 18 years

  • Indication of deep sedation with propofol and fentanyl for more than 48 h

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Brain damage

  • Cognitive impairment

  • Allergy to propofol or fentanyl

  • Limitation of therapeutic effort

  • Liver chronic disease Child C

  • Prone positioning and use of neuromuscular blocking agents

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Centro de Investigación Cínica Avanzada (CICA), Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile Santiago RM Chile 7690306
2 Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile Santiago RM Chile 7690306

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Chile

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonello Penna, MD/PhD, University of Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo Gutiérrez, MD, University of Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Felipe Maldonado, MD, University of Chile
  • Principal Investigator: José Ignacio Egaña, MD/PhD, University of Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Eduardo Tobar, MD, University of Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Verónica Rojas, Nurse/MSc, University of Chile

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Antonello Penna, Anesthesiologist, MD, PhD, University of Chile
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04026451
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1009/18
First Posted:
Jul 19, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Apr 28, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by Antonello Penna, Anesthesiologist, MD, PhD, University of Chile
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 28, 2021