Novomax: Comparison of Bioactive Glass Ceramics Spacer and PEEK Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective, RCT

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03302520
Collaborator
(none)
54
1
2
34.1
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The authors aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass ceramics with PEEK cage that is widely used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery in the clinical field.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: NovoMax, BioAlpha Inc, Seong-nam, Korea
  • Device: PEEK cage
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
54 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Fusion Rate and Clinical Results Between Bioactive Glass Ceramics Spacer With PEEK Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 28, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 11, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Novomax

Novomax(R) ceramic glass spacer for interbody fusion

Device: NovoMax, BioAlpha Inc, Seong-nam, Korea
CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass ceramics spacer

Active Comparator: PEEK cage

PEEK cage for interbody fusion

Device: PEEK cage
PEEK cage

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Fusion rates [up to 5 year after operation]

    This is assessed by postoperative computed tomography at 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) [3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    VAS is a measurement score that indicates pain severity status. VAS score comprised a 10-cm line with ''none'' (0) on one end of the scale and ''disabling pain'' (10) on the other.

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    The ODI is based on a self-administered questionnaire measuring ''back-specific function.'' The questionnaire comprises 10 items, each with 6 levels of response. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total summation is converted to a 0-100 scale.20 The ODI scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating severe symptoms.

  3. EQ-5D [3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. This can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement. The scores on these five dimensions can be presented as a health profile or can be converted to a single summary index number (utility) reflecting preferability compared to other health profiles.

  4. PainDETECT [3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    The painDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) is a screening tool designed to detect neuropathic pain in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) based on self-reported pain characteristics. The degree of the seven types of pain quality, the type of pain pattern, and the presence of radiating pain. From the three components of the PDQ, a total score is calculated; a high score indicates that the pain is likely to have a neuropathic component. Scoring is performed using a scoring manual, and results in a final screening score: a score of 0-12 indicates nociceptive pain, 19-38 indicates neuropathic pain, and 13-18 indicates mixed pain.

  5. Fusion rates [every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    This is assessed by postoperative simple radiography at 1 year after surgery

  6. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 [every year, up to 5 year after operation]

    Device related adverse events (fracture, translation, subsidence, osteolysis), Surgery related adverse events (incidental durotomy, wound infection, re-operation, re-admission)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Operation duration [Immediate after operation]

    Intraoperative time

  2. Intraoperative blood loss [Immediate after operation]

    Intraoperative blood loss

  3. Postoperative drainage [Within 3 days after operation]

    Total drainage after surgery

  4. Amount of transfusion [Within 7 days after operation]

    Total transfusion during and after surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients aged between 30 and 80

  • patients who required one-level PLIF between L1 and S1 among those who required an extensive laminectomy or facetectomy to correct severe disc extrusion or severe spinal stenosis or those who required PLIF due to grade I or II spondylolisthesis

  • those who (only if a signature was obtainable), or whose legal guardian, fully understood the clinical trial details and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • osteoporosis patients with average T-scores of L1-L4 at <-3.0 in DEXA bone density tests

  • women with positive pregnancy tests before the trial or who planned to become pregnant within the following 3 years

  • patients with a history of malignant tumor or malignant diseases (but the cases of cured disease with no relapse for the past 5 years were included in the present study)

  • patients with abnormal blood potassium and phosphorus levels;

  • patients with liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, metabolic disease, or psychological disease;

  • patients deemed to have less than 1-year life expectancy;

  • patients with mental retardation or whose parents or legal guardians were older or had mental disabilities;

  • other patients viewed as inappropriate by the staff

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyounggido Korea, Republic of

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jin S. Yeom, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03302520
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Nvmax_001
First Posted:
Oct 5, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Mar 23, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 23, 2022