EXPLORE DMR: Early Feasibility Study of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to Treat Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Sponsor
Polares Medical SA (Industry)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04679662
Collaborator
Polares Medical, Inc. (Other)
10
1
69

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

An early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and to gather preliminary data on its performance thereby providing guidance for future clinical development. The study is a single-arm registry with the last follow-up visit at 5 years post-intervention. The study will enroll up to 10 patients at one (1) center in Brazil.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)
N/A

Detailed Description

Percutaneous approaches to treat MR promise to provide a sufficient reduction in MR without the risks typically associated with open heart surgery. Furthermore there is an unmet clinical need for patients with severe MR who are refused or denied surgery due to high risk. Percutaneous therapy provides a novel alternative treatment option for these patients with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality over and above current medical therapy. The Polares Medical PLAR Implant and Delivery System is a catheter-based technology designed to permanently implant a prosthesis using a transvenous / transseptal approach to augment the posterior mitral valve leaflet and improve coaptation with the anterior leaflet. Approved edge-to-edge repair has already been shown to be a viable alternative for high risk MR patients. However treatment with these devices is limited to specific anatomies and often requires multiple devices which increases clinical risk, adds to procedural time, and can result in residual MR. The PLAR Implant and Delivery System has been designed to overcome and mitigate some of these shortfalls.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Single-arm registrySingle-arm registry
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Device Feasibility
Official Title:
Early Feasibility Study of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to Treat Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation (EXPLORE DMR)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Single-arm study of PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe mitral regurgitation

All enrolled patients will receive the study device

Device: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)
The PLAR Implant is placed mitral valve posterior annulus using its delivery system via femoral vein access and a transeptal puncture
Other Names:
  • TMVr
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence of all-cause mortality following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System [30-days follow-up]

      Primary safety outcome

    2. Incidence of change from severe mitral regurgitation at baseline (Grade 3+ or more) to moderate or less mitral regurgitation (Grade 2+ or less) following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System as evaluated by 2D TTE [30-days follow-up]

      Primary performance endpoint

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of major safety events as defined by MVARC2 definitions [Follow-up at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years]

      Secondary safety endpoint

    2. Technical success rate per MVARC2 definitions [Technical success is measured immediately following the procedure]

      All of the following must be present for technical success: Absence of procedure mortality Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s) Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure

    3. Procedure success rate per MVARC2 definitions [Procedure success is measured at 30 days follow-up]

      Both of the following must be present for procedure success: Device success Absence of major device or procedure-related serious adverse events as below: Death Stroke Life-threatening bleed Major vascular complication Major cardiac structural complication Stage 2 or 3 AKI MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention

    4. Device success rate per MVARC 2 definitions [Device success is measured at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years follow-up]

      All of the following must be present for device success: Absence of procedure mortality or stroke Proper placement and positioning of device Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure Continued intended safety and performance of the device as below: No evidence of structural or functional failure No device technical failure issues/complications MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis

    5. Patient success rate per MVARC2 definitions [Patient success is measured at 12 months follow-up]

      All of the following must be present for patient success: Device success Patient returned to pre-procedure setting No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure • Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. 18 years of age or older

    2. Greater than moderate degenerative mitral regurgitation (Grade 3+ or higher) as confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 90 days prior to study procedure

    3. Patient must present with an STS Score less than 10%

    4. High surgical risk for conventional mitral repair or replacement due to morphological criteria (e.g. leaflet or annulus calcifications), but operable, as assessed by the local heart team comprised of a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in treating mitral valve disease and heart failure

    5. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV

    6. Patient willing to participate in study and provide signed IRB/EC-approved informed consent

    7. Treating physician and patient agree that patient is able to return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Severe tricuspid regurgitation

    2. Severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency

    3. Severe mitral annulus calcification

    4. Diseased mitral anterior leaflet such as flail / prolapse/ heavy calcification

    5. Implanted vena cava filter

    6. Femoral veins with severe angulation and calcification

    7. Contraindication for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or MDCT scan

    8. Active infection or endocarditis

    9. Previous mitral valve surgery

    10. Prior orthotopic heart transplantation

    11. Pulmonary artery systolic hypertension > 70mmHg

    12. Evidence of intra-cardiac, inferior vena cava (IVC) or femoral venous thrombus

    13. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%

    14. Implant or revision of any pacing device < 30 days prior to intervention

    15. Symptomatic coronary artery disease treated < 30 days prior to study procedure

    16. Myocardial infarction requiring intervention < 30 days prior to study procedure

    17. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis), hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathies, and constrictive pericarditis

    18. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding < 90 days prior to study procedure

    19. Stroke < 180 days prior to study procedure

    20. Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) or patient requiring dialysis

    21. Cardiogenic shock at time of enrolment

    22. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance

    23. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 2 years

    24. Pregnancy at time of enrolment

    25. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or leukopenia (WBC < 3,000 mcL) or acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000 cells mcL)

    26. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, nitinol, tantalum or allergy to contrast agents that cannot be pre-medicated

    27. Severe dementia or lack of capacity due to conditions that result in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevent independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up assessments

    28. Emergency situations

    29. Company employees or their immediate family members

    30. Patient is under guardianship

    31. Patient is participating in another clinical study for which follow-up is currently ongoing

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Polares Medical SA
    • Polares Medical, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Laura A Brenton, Polares Medical

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Polares Medical SA
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04679662
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 202003
    First Posted:
    Dec 22, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 22, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 22, 2020