Efficacy of Microcurrent Therapy After Eccentric Exercise

Sponsor
University of Liege (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02322489
Collaborator
(none)
15
1
2
5
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

15 participants will be included in the present study. They will attend two groups of three sessions (i.e. sessions 1-2-3 and sessions 4-5-6) spaced by 3 months:

  • session 1 and 4 (performed a few days before the experimental session): session for participants to get familiarized with the test battery.

  • session 2 and 5: experimental session (the test battery followed by the provocative task, the test battery, the one-hour "treatment" and the test battery again).

  • session 3 and 6 (performed 2 days later): the test battery.

The test battery included flexibility, functional, pressure pain threshold tests.

The provocative task was an isokinetic eccentric task for knee flexors and extensors.

The treatment was either a microcurrent therapy or a placebo microcurrent therapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Microcurrent Therapy
  • Device: Sham microcurrent therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Objective:

To study the efficacy of microcurrent to reduce DOMS (Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness) occuring after an eccentric exercise

Methods:

Experimental protocol

Participants will attend two groups of three sessions (i.e. sessions 1-2-3 and sessions 4-5-6) spaced by 3 months:

  • session 1 and 4 (performed a few days before the experimental session): session for participants to get familiarized with the test battery.

  • session 2 and 5: experimental session: the test battery followed by the provocative task, the test battery, the one-hour "treatment" (real microcurrents at one of the session and placebo microcurrents at the other one) and the test battery again.

  • session 3 and 6 (performed 2 days later): the test battery.

Before starting session 2, patients will be randomized into the microcurrent group or the placebo microcurrent group. Three months later, participants will change of group.

The Test Battery: it will be conducted by a blind (to the treatment) investigator. It will include knee flexor and extensor flexibility tests, a functional test (unilateral " counter-movement jump "), a pain to measure pain threshold of thigh muscles and an isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) test of knee flexors and extensors.

The Provocative task: 40 isokinetic eccentric contractions of knee flexors and extensors.

The one-hour Treatment: with the participant lying on an examination table, several electrodes were located over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy was then started. It was stopped after 5 seconds in the "Placebo group" and after one hour in the real "Microcurrent group". The microcurrents were delivered by the machine B-E-St®.

Follow-up: in addition to the 48hours follow-up (session 3/6), participants will fill in a pain visual analogue scale each day after the session 2/5.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
15 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Efficacy of Microcurrent Therapy After Eccentric Exercise
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham microcurrent therapy

The participant is lying on an examination table for one hour; several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started but it lasts only for 5 seconds.

Device: Sham microcurrent therapy
Several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started but lasts only for five seconds.

Experimental: Microcurrent Group

The participant is lying on an examination table for one hour; several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started.

Device: Microcurrent Therapy
Several electrodes are placed over the muscles involved in the provocative task. The microcurrent therapy is then started and lasts for one hour.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Intensity of pain (Visual analogue scale) [baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up, following days until pain disappears]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Flexibility of quadriceps and hamstrings muscles [baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up]

    Flexibility of quadriceps muscle was assessed by means of the Prone Quadriceps Flexibility test. Flexibility of hamstrings was assessed by means of the Straight Leg Raising (SLR) test

  2. Functional test (Unilateral counter-movement jump) [baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up]

    Unilateral counter-movement jump

  3. Pain sensibility threshold (Determined by using a dolorimeter) [baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up]

    Determined by using a dolorimeter

  4. Isometric strength (Maximal voluntary contraction of knee flexor and extensor muscles) [baseline, post-provocative task, post-treatment, 48h follow-up]

    Maximal voluntary contraction of knee flexor and extensor muscles

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Asymptomatic subjects
Exclusion Criteria:
  • practice of sports >3h per week

  • present pain in the lower limbs

  • history of thigh muscle injuries

  • recent injury (last 3 months) of the lower limbs

  • recent (last 3 months) plyometric exercises or lower limbs strengthening program.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Liege University Hospital Center Liege Belgium 4000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Liege

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Demoulin, PhD, University of Liege

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Christophe Demoulin, Main investigator, University of Liege
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02322489
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Microcurrent
First Posted:
Dec 23, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Jun 9, 2015
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Christophe Demoulin, Main investigator, University of Liege
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 9, 2015