CYTOPRO: Comparison Between 25 µg Vaginal Misoprostol vs Slow Release Pessary PGE2

Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01765881
Collaborator
(none)
1,700
4
2
36
425
11.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

For about 10% of pregnancies, it is necessary to induce delivery for medical reasons. Prostaglandins alone can be used to perform cervical ripening in cases of immature cervix. In France, dinoprostone is the own approved medication. It is in the form of gel or sustained release device whose effectiveness and side effects are comparable. The vaginal misoprostol has no marketing authorization in France, but is sometimes used. Some data in the scientific literature have showed that its use with low-dose (25 mcg) vaginally did not lead to more complications, was at least as effective and seems to be cost-effective compared with dinoprostone. Misoprostol with this dose and route of administration is now recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG), Grade A (ACOG Practice Bulletin August 2009). This is not the case in France (French HAS 2008 Guidelines on induction of labor). According to HAS, the investigators still lack data on large samples to confirm the benefits of misoprostol 25 mcg vaginally, in terms of efficiency, rate of cesarean section, and lower cost compared to dinoprostone.

The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg vs. dinoprostone in terms of cesarian section occurence with a non-inferiority margin of +5% difference.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

To show if the experimental treatment (25μg of intravaginal misoprostol) used for induction of labor in singleton women ≥ 36 weeks gestation with an unfavorable cervix is not clinically and statistically inferior than the reference treatment , ie intravaginal dinoprostone sustained release (10mg), in terms of cesarian sectionto compare the cost-effectiveness and to assess the differential tolerance of the two strategies.

Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the upper limit of the 90%-bilateral confidence interval of the difference between cesarian section rates (misoprostol - dinosprostone) is below 5% in the intention-to-treat analysis and the per-protocol analysis.

If non-inferiority is demonstrated, as a secondary analysis, superiority of misosprostol will be tested.

Orther secondary objectives are to assess the cost-effectiveness, the tolerance, maternal satisfaction and other efficacy endpoints of the two strategies.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1700 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison Between 25 µg Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Slow Release Pessary Prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) : Could we Use Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol as a First Line Treatment for Induction of Labor ?
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Misoprostol

one 25 micrograms capsule all 4 hours by intravaginal route

Drug: Misoprostol
administration of Misoprostol 25 micrograms capsule by intravaginal route every 4 hours, up to 4 capsules
Other Names:
  • CYTOTEC
  • 25 micrograms Misoprostol capsule by intravaginal route
  • Active Comparator: Dinoprostone

    one unique intravaginal sustained released of 10 milligrams

    Drug: Dinoprostone
    administration of one sustained released pessary of 10 milligrams by intravaginal route
    Other Names:
  • PROPESS
  • one intravaginal sustained released capsule of 10 milligrams
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Cesarean for all indications [Up to delivery]

      Occurrence of cesarean section for all indications

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Cost-effectiveness of two strategies (direct medical cost differential efficiency strategies measured by the Cesarean rate [Up to discharge / end of study]

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Adverse events [Up to discharge/end of study]

      Summary description of all adverse events, related adverse events and serious adverse events by treatment using MedRA classification.

    2. Other specific safety assessments [Up to discharge/end of study]

      Maternal hyperstimulation syndromes with or without changes of foetal heart rate, uterine hypertonus, rate, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, degree III/IV perineal tears, uterine rupture, neonatal rate of pH <7.05 and/or BDbase deficit> 12mmol / L, rates Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, transfer rate in neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU), neonatal seizures

    3. Other efficacy assessments [Up to discharge/end of study]

      Time from 1st treatment administration to delivery, ocytocine administration and dose, occurrence of instrumental delivery, occurrence of spontaneous delivery

    4. Participant satisfaction assessment [Up to discharge/end of study]

      Maternal satisfaction using visual analog scale and questionnaire

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • singleton pregnancy

    • Cephalic presentation

    • Bishop ≤ 5

    • ≤ 3 uterine contractions / 10 mn

    • ≥ 36 weeks gestation

    • Personally signed and dated informed consent document

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History of cesarian-section

    • uterine scar

    • deceleration on Cardiotocogram (CTG)

    • placenta praevia

    • bleeding

    • chorioamnionitis

    • Fetal weight US ≥4500 g

    • Contra-indication to vaginal delivery

    • Hystory of myomectomy

    • Herpes primoinfection or recurrence

    • Allergy to prostaglandins

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Bicêtre Hospital Le Kremlin-Bicêtre France 94000
    2 Hospital Poissy Poissy France 78303
    3 Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg Strasbourg France 67091
    4 University Hospital Toulouse Toulouse France 31059

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Hospital, Toulouse

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Christophe Vayssière, MD PhD, University Hospital, Toulouse

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University Hospital, Toulouse
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01765881
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1014301
    • 2011-000933-35
    First Posted:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by University Hospital, Toulouse
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 28, 2016