DAC-UK: Trialling an Online UK Dementia Awareness for Caregivers Course

Sponsor
University College, London (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05887063
Collaborator
(none)
51
1
2
5.8
8.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether an online Dementia Awareness Course is feasible for delivery and acceptable to informal caregivers of people living with dementia in the UK. It will also explore the impact of the course on different caregiver outcomes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Dementia Awareness Course UK
N/A

Detailed Description

All participants were given information on the study before providing informed consent. The participants were screened against eligibility criteria before being randomly allocated to either the treatment condition of attending the course, or the control condition of treatment as usual. Participants completed 5 outcome measures and a demographics questionnaire at baseline. The treatment group then attended a one-off half-day Dementia Awareness Course online, delivered by one trainee clinical psychologist. A month later, all participants completed the same 5 outcome measures and those who attended the course also attended a one-to-one half an hour online semi-structured interview.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
51 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Investigating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of an Online UK Dementia Awareness Course for Informal Caregivers: A Mixed Methods Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 13, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 6, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 6, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Dementia Awareness Course

Participants attended one half-day Dementia Awareness course as a part of a group, delivered online

Other: Dementia Awareness Course UK
An online course delivered to a small group of informal caregivers in between 3 and 4 hours. The course is made up of three modules: what is dementia, positive engagement and caring for someone with dementia. The course is delivered by one facilitator and includes teaching, discussions and activities.

No Intervention: Treatment as Usual

Participants did not receive any active treatment but were able to access their usual supports

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of target sample recruited within 6 months. [6 months]

    Feasibility of recruitment, considered feasible if full sample successfully recruited within 6 month time frame

  2. Percentage of participants retained at follow-up to measure feasibility of the study design. [1 month]

    75% considered indicative of a feasible study design

  3. Percentage of completion of outcome measures to measure feasibility and acceptability. [Baseline and 1 month]

    75% considered indicative of feasible and acceptable outcome measures

  4. Retention and attendance percentages to measure feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. [1 month]

    60% considered indicative of feasible and acceptable intervention

  5. Qualitative acceptability of the intervention, as measured by qualitative thematic analysis of participant interviews to capture themes regarding participant experience of the course. [1 month]

    Exploratory thematic analysis

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change from baseline in the mean Zarit burden inventory scores at one-month follow up [Baseline and 1 month]

    Exploratory outcome measure - questionnaire. The short-form Zarit burden inventory (ZBI) is a 12-item questionnaire that measures caregiver's perceived burden as a result of their role. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) where a low score is indicative of a low sense of burden. The ZBI is one of the most commonly used measures for burden in the field and has been shown to have high levels of validity and reliability.

  2. Change from baseline in the mean Quality caregiver-patient relationship (QCPR) scores at one-month follow up [Baseline and 1 month]

    Exploratory outcome measure - questionnaire. The carer version of the quality of the caregiver patient relationships (QCPR) is a 14-question survey that captures the positive and negative aspects of the caregiving relationship. The questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 is totally disagree and 5 is totally agree. Six items are reversed scored (2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 13). A score of less than 42 is considered indicative of a poor caregiver-patient relationship, a score of 42-56 is labelled as a standard relationship, with scores of higher than 56 indicating a good relationship. Reliability and validity of the QCPR have been found to be high.

  3. Change from baseline in the mean GAIN measure scores at one-month follow up [Baseline and 1 month]

    Exploratory outcome measure - questionnaire. The gain in Alzheimer's care instrument (GAIN) comprises of 10 questions that cover the possible positive aspects of a caregiving role in terms of relationship with the person living with dementia, self-reflection and personal development. Each question is scored from 0 to 5 (disagree a lot to agree a lot) where a high score suggests a high level of positive gain from caregiving. This tool has been found to be valid and reliable for use.

  4. Change from baseline in the mean approaches to dementia (ADQ-19) scores at one-month follow up [Baseline and 1 month]

    Exploratory outcome measure - questionnaire. The approaches to dementia questionnaire (ADQ-19) is a 19-question survey that measures an individual's attitudes towards dementia and people living with dementia. Each question is scored on a five-point Likert scale from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). Reverse scoring is used on items 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and an overall high score indicates positive attitudes towards dementia and person living with dementia. The ADQ-19 has been shown to have good reliability (α=0.76 for hope, α=0.85 for person-centredness) and validity when compared with similar measures and qualitative observations.

  5. Change from baseline in the mean short sense of competence (SSCQ) scores at one-month follow up [Baseline and 1 month]

    Exploratory outcome measure - questionnaire. The short sense of competence questionnaire (SSCQ) is a 7-item questionnaire that measures an individual's sense of competence in their role as a caregiver. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is agree strongly and 5 is disagree strongly. Scores can range from 7 to 35 with higher scores indicating a greater sense of competence/satisfaction. The SSCQ has been found to have high construct validity (r=0.88) when compared to the original sense of competence questionnaire and alongside this, high reliability (α=0.76).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Self-identified informal caregiver of a person living with dementia in the community.

  • Residing in the U.K.

  • Ability to engage in a course delivered in English

  • Have access to an internet-connected device capable of videoconferencing (camera and microphone functioning)

  • Available to attend pre-specified dates for DAC-UK delivery.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Person living with dementia residing in residential care

  • Professional caregiver of people living with dementia.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University College London London United Kingdom WC1E 6BT

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University College, London

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aimee Spector, UCL

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University College, London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05887063
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 22375.001
First Posted:
Jun 2, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 2, 2023
Last Verified:
May 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University College, London
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 2, 2023