Movement and Music Intervention for Individuals With Dementia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to learn about how possible benefits of movement and music for individuals with dementia. Individuals with dementia will participate in a dance class. The study includes assessments of walking, balance and cognition.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Dementia impacts 5%-7% of individuals >60 years old. It impacts the person's ability to perform work, care for him/herself and ultimately leads to physical disability. There is a high caregiver burden associated with dementia and many individuals require care in a long-term care facility. There is some emerging evidence that music based interventions may have a protective effect on the brain in those with dementia. There is also evidence that doing activities that engage the brain through music are beneficial. This study seeks to investigate the potential benefits of a music based intervention for individuals with dementia. The study aims to recruit individuals with a diagnosis of dementia. Once enrolled participants will undergo assessment of walking, balance and cognition and then be asked to participate either in a dance class or to listen to live music. After 6 weeks and again at the end of the study (after 12 weeks) participants will undergo assessments of walking, balance and cognition.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Dance in dementia examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. |
Other: Dance
The primary intervention is a dance class
|
Active Comparator: Music and dementia examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. |
Other: Music
the secondary intervention is listening to live music
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Timed up and go Cognitive [12 weeks]
The change in time to complete the Timed Up and Go - Cognitive (TUG-Cog) is recorded in seconds. The participant is timed with a stop watch while walking 3 meters turning and returning to a chair while performing a concurrent cognitive task. This time is compared to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the difference in time indicates the effect cognitive deficits have on motor function. Higher scores, indicating more time, means worse outcomes.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [12 weeks]
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an assessment of overall cognitive status. The range of scores is 0-30, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Scores 26 or higher indicates normal cognitive function.
Other Outcome Measures
- Change in Score on the Caregiver Burden Scale [12 weeks]
A questionnaire asking caregivers about the impact of caregiving on daily life. Scores range from 0-88, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes or more burden. Scores of 0-20 = little or no burden, 21-40 = mild to moderate burden, 41-60 = moderate to severe burden, and 61-80 = severe burden.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of dementia
-
Mini-Mental State Examination score > 9
-
Age > 60 years
-
Able to follow simple instructions
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Unable to walk 10 feet unassisted
-
Presence of orthopedic disorder that impacts walking
-
Presence of other neurologic diagnosis that impacts cognitive or motor function such as stroke, Parkinson disease or traumatic brain injury
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43210 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ohio State University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Deb Kegelmeyer, DPT, Ohio State University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2016H0211
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 1 participant was excluded due to not meeting criteria on minimum score required for participation on the Mini Mental Status Examination |
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 17 | 3 |
COMPLETED | 6 | 1 |
NOT COMPLETED | 11 | 2 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. Dance: The primary intervention is a dance class | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. music: the secondary intervention is listening to live music | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 17 | 3 | 20 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
>=65 years |
17
100%
|
3
100%
|
20
100%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
83.76
(7.55)
|
74
(11.36)
|
82.3
(8.62)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
9
52.9%
|
2
66.7%
|
11
55%
|
Male |
8
47.1%
|
1
33.3%
|
9
45%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
17
100%
|
3
100%
|
20
100%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
17
100%
|
3
100%
|
20
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Timed up and go Cognitive |
---|---|
Description | The change in time to complete the Timed Up and Go - Cognitive (TUG-Cog) is recorded in seconds. The participant is timed with a stop watch while walking 3 meters turning and returning to a chair while performing a concurrent cognitive task. This time is compared to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the difference in time indicates the effect cognitive deficits have on motor function. Higher scores, indicating more time, means worse outcomes. |
Time Frame | 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. Dance: The primary intervention is a dance class | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. music: the secondary intervention is listening to live music |
Measure Participants | 6 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [seconds] |
-6.49
(9.66)
|
-13.35
(0)
|
Title | Change in Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
---|---|
Description | The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an assessment of overall cognitive status. The range of scores is 0-30, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Scores 26 or higher indicates normal cognitive function. |
Time Frame | 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. |
Measure Participants | 6 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-1.5
(2.07)
|
0
(0)
|
Title | Change in Score on the Caregiver Burden Scale |
---|---|
Description | A questionnaire asking caregivers about the impact of caregiving on daily life. Scores range from 0-88, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes or more burden. Scores of 0-20 = little or no burden, 21-40 = mild to moderate burden, 41-60 = moderate to severe burden, and 61-80 = severe burden. |
Time Frame | 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. Dance: The primary intervention is a dance class | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. music: the secondary intervention is listening to live music |
Measure Participants | 6 | 1 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
-5.17
(8.51)
|
-7
(0)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia | ||
Arm/Group Description | examine if participating in a dance class improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. Dance: The primary intervention is a dance class | examine if listening to music improves mobility and/or cognition in individuals with dementia. music: the secondary intervention is listening to live music | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/3 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/3 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Dance in Dementia | Music and Dementia | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/3 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Deb Kegelmeyer |
---|---|
Organization | The Ohio State University |
Phone | 614-293-0214 |
kegelmeyer.1@osu.edu |
- 2016H0211