Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Posterior resin composite is challenging esthetic restoration. Patients seek for durable, esthetic and functional restorations in molars. one of the major problems is polymerization shrinkage. Some materials were developed to overcome the polymerization shrinkage, among them bulk fill resin composite which have been developed to reduce the shrinkage stress during polymerization and offer much greater depth of cure. This is achieved by the addition of fillers such as barium aluminum silicate filler, ytterbium trifluoride and mixed oxides. Furthermore, a prepolymerized fillers have been added with silanes to reduce shrinkage stress. so, the objective of this trial is to clinical Evaluate and compare clinical performance of bulk fill VS incremental filling technique.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: bulkfill composites sonic fill 3 & PALFIQUE bulk flow bulk fill composite |
Other: sonic fill 3 & PALFIQUE bulk flow & Neo spectra & Clear fill AP-X
dental filling materials
|
Active Comparator: incremental composites Neo spectra & Clear fill AP-X incremental composites |
Other: sonic fill 3 & PALFIQUE bulk flow & Neo spectra & Clear fill AP-X
dental filling materials
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Post operative sensitivity [along one year]
restorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
- marginal discoloration [along one year]
restorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
- marginal adaptation [along one year]
restorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
- recurrent caries [along one year]
restorations will be evaluated the according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
inclusion criteria of participants:
-
Male gender
-
Good oral hygiene
-
Only Cooperative patient
-
Medically free patient
-
Age range 18-24
inclusion criteria of the teeth:
-
Vital teeth with no periapical lesion or radiolucency.
-
Prepared cavity with no undermined enamel walls.
-
Functioning tooth with presence of an opposing.
-
Healthy periodontium.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
exclusion criteria of participants:
-
Old age patients
-
Patients have systemic disease or sever medically compromised
-
Patients with bruxism, clenching or temporomandibular joint disorder.
-
Por oral hygiene
exclusion criteria of teeth:
-
Teeth with periapical lesions.
-
Teeth with visible cracks.
-
Teeth with mobility.
-
Non-functioning tooth with no opposing tooth.
-
Heavy occlusion or signs of sever attrition.
-
Tooth with Periodontal affection.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Faculty of dental medicine Al Azhar university | Cairo | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Al-Azhar University
Investigators
- Study Chair: Nady Ebrahem Hasanin, professor, Faculty of dental medicine Al Azhar university
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 732/385