Evaluation of Clinical Success of Restorations Using Different Magnification Aids
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aimed to investigate the effect of using a loupe and dental operating microscope with different magnifications on the success of class II direct composite restorations.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A total of 130 class II, D2 deep caries teeth of 85 patients were randomly distributed to the naked eye, 3x magnification loupe, 5x magnification loupe, 8.5x magnification dental operating microscope (DOM) groups, and direct composite restorations were made with these magnification aids. carried out. Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Clearfil Majesty Posterior composite were used in all restorations. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at 1,6 and 12-month periods, and restorations were scored between 1 and 5 for all criteria.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: with no magnification aid treatment Dental caries treatment with no magnification aid |
|
Active Comparator: with x2 dental loupe Dental caries treatment with x2 dental loupe |
Device: Dental Loupe
Magnification aid
|
Active Comparator: with x5 dental loupe Dental caries treatment with x5 dental loupe |
Device: Dental Loupe
Magnification aid
|
Active Comparator: with dental operation microscope Dental caries treatment with dental operation microscope |
Device: Dental Operation Microscope
Magnification aid
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Evaluation of Restoration Success using FDI Criteria [a week after dental treatment]
FDI criteria were categorized into three groups [3]: esthetic (four criteria), functional (three criteria) and biological (one criterion) parameters
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Good oral and dental care of the patient,
-
The need for at least 1 Class II restoration at a depth of D2 in the posterior group teeth,
-
No crowding in the tooth to be restored, tooth contact and antagonist,
-
The relevant tooth is vital,
-
Absence of pain on percussion and palpation of the tooth.
-
Absence of any pathology in the periapical tissues in radiographic evaluation,
-
The patient was informed about the study and accepted the study,
-
Having agreed to attend 1 month, 6 month and 12 month control sessions,
-
The patient has no systemic disease,
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Presence of severe periodontal disease,
-
Teeth that cannot be insulated, malposed or overloaded or not loaded at all,
-
Periodontal and endodontic removal of the relevant tooth is healthy,
-
the patient is undergoing orthodontic treatment,
-
Recording of dry mouth is set,
-
Severe bruxism habit,
-
Smoking
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ataturk University | Erzurum | Turkey | 25080 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Ataturk University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- ipek001