Novel Self-Adhesive Composite Hybrid Versus Conventional Composite in Restoration of Carious Primary Teeth.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The clinical trial aim to evaluate clinical effectiveness of self-adhesive composite hybrid (Surefil one) versus conventional composite(VOCO Grandio) as restorative material for carious primary teeth.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Composite resin is a continuous improving material as its full fill many requirements seeking in dental restorative materials, but is the new introducing composite resin material is always better than the previous one? This randomized clinical trial is performed to discus and assess that hypothesis. A total of 120 class I restoration(60 Surefil one novel self-adhesive composite hybrid & 60 VOCO Grandio conventional composite resin) will be placed in posterior teeth of 60 volunteers(splint mouth design) following the manufacturer instruction. age between 4-7 years. The restorations will then be evaluate clinically at baseline, 3, and 6 month intervene. Both the procedure and follow up will done in the out-patient clinic, Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Novel self-adhesive composite restoration (Surefil one)
|
Other: Novel self-adhesive hybrid composite(Surefil one)
Surefil one, is a recent introduced esthetic dental restoration for treatment of carious teeth.
|
Active Comparator: conventional composite resin restoration(VOCO Grandio)
|
Other: Novel self-adhesive hybrid composite(Surefil one)
Surefil one, is a recent introduced esthetic dental restoration for treatment of carious teeth.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- clinical effectiveness [6 month intervene]
The two materials will be evaluated using the FDI World Federation criteria.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The cost effectiveness [6 month intervene]
will be measured using the ICER (Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio)
- Duration of procedure [6 month intervene]
measure using stop watch
- Child cooperation [6 month intervene]
Wright Modification of Frankl behavior scale will be use(Rating1-5 as R1 definitely negative, and R5 definitely positive).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Children:
Good general health and medically free patients. Age ranges: from 4-7 years old. A provided informed consent by the parents. Acceptable child cooperation.
Teeth:
Class I carious primary teeth. 2 contralateral or adjacent carious teeth. Simple caries, extending to the dentin. No singe or symptom of pulp inflammation. Normal radiographic examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
Children:
Unable to attend follow-up visits. Refusal of participation.
Teeth:
Symptom tooth. Periapical Pathosis. Mobile primary tooth.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
- Study Director: Kamal Aldin El Motayam, Professor, Cairo University
- Study Director: Passant Nagi, PHD, Cairo University
- Principal Investigator: Mahitab M Abdel khalek, BDS, Cairo University
- Principal Investigator: Fatema H Mohamed, BDS, Cairo University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Surefil one in primary teeth