Evaluation of Oral Hygiene Products in an In Situ Caries Model
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study will evaluate and compare the potential anti-caries efficacy of a test regimen:
placebo (fluoride free) toothpaste (twice daily use) plus fluoride mouthwash (once daily use), in comparison with brushing with a placebo toothpaste alone (twice daily use), to remineralize previously demineralized enamel specimens, as measured by Surface MicroHardness Recovery (%SMHR).
This will be a single center, randomized, laboratory analyst blinded, placebo, four treatment, cross-over study in healthy participants. Participants will be assessed at baseline and at the beginning and end of each treatment visit to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride |
Drug: Fluoride free toothpaste
Brushing with fluoride free toothpaste
Drug: Fluoride mouthwash
Fluoride mouth wash to be followed after brushing with fluoride free toothpaste in "Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse" arm and in "Fluoride dentifrice/Fluoride rinse" arm
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo dentifrice/No rinse Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste |
Drug: Fluoride free toothpaste
Brushing with fluoride free toothpaste
|
Active Comparator: Fluoride dentifrice/No rinse Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride |
Drug: Fluoride toothpaste
Brushing with fluoride containing toothpaste
|
Experimental: Fluoride dentifrice/Fluoride rinse Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride. |
Drug: Fluoride toothpaste
Brushing with fluoride containing toothpaste
Drug: Fluoride mouthwash
Fluoride mouth wash to be followed after brushing with fluoride free toothpaste in "Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse" arm and in "Fluoride dentifrice/Fluoride rinse" arm
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse [Baseline to 14 days]
SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents re-hardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer [μm]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): [D1-R/D1-B]*100.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse [Baseline to 14 days]
SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer [μm]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): [D1-R/D1-B]*100.
- Enamel Fluoride Uptake [Baseline to 14 days]
The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 micrometer (μm) through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as microgram per square centimeter (μg/cm^2).
- Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 14 [Baseline to Day14]
Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 baseline prior to supervised treatment. - at day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.
- Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 14 [Baseline up to Day 14]
Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Aged between 18 and 85 years inclusive
-
Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions
-
Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee:
-
No clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination.
-
Absence of any condition that could affect the participant's safety or well-being or their ability to understand and follow study procedures and requirements
-
Currently living in the Indianapolis, Indiana area and has not had a professional fluoride treatment within 14 days of the first treatment visit
-
Currently wearing a removable mandibular partial denture with sufficient room in one posterior buccal flange areas to accommodate two enamel specimens
-
Willing to have their denture modified to accommodate enamel test specimens and willing and capable of wearing their removable mandibular partial dentures 24 hours per day during the experimental periods
-
Have a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (un-stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2 milliliter (mL)/minute; gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8 mL/minute).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Pregnant or breast feeding women
-
Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients
-
Currently taking antibiotics or have taken antibiotics in the two weeks prior to the screening visit.
-
Taking or have taken a bisphosphonate drug for treatment of osteoporosis.
-
Participation in another GSKCH investigational dental product study within seven days of first study treatment.
-
Previous participation in this study.
-
Recent history (within the last year) of alcohol or other substance abuse.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | GSK Investigational Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
- Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 203160
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited at one center in United States of America. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | A total of 80 participants were screened. Of the 80 participants, 62 were randomized and 53 completed the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In this cross-over study, participants were randomized to receive each of following treatments: Fluoride dentifrice/Fluoride rinse Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse Fluoride dentifrice/No rinse Placebo dentifrice/No rinse |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 62 |
COMPLETED | 53 |
NOT COMPLETED | 9 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All randomized participants were evaluated for baseline characteristics |
Overall Participants | 62 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
64.1
(10.45)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
35
56.5%
|
Male |
27
43.5%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
30
48.4%
|
White |
30
48.4%
|
More than one race |
2
3.2%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse Compared to Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse |
---|---|
Description | SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents re-hardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer [μm]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): [D1-R/D1-B]*100. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 14 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per-protocol (PP) population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 parts per million (ppm) of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste |
Measure Participants | 53 | 52 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [% SMHR] |
24.48
(16.088)
|
8.09
(25.892)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | From ANOVA: participant (random), treatment (fixed), period (fixed) | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 16.76 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 11.061 to 22.454 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Difference is Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse minus Placebo dentifrice/No rinse such that a positive difference implies a larger response value for the Placebo dentifrice/Fluoride rinse. |
Title | Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (SMHR) of Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse, Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse, Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse and Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse |
---|---|
Description | SMHR test was used to assess the changes in mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMHR was performed ex-vivo and determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. % SMH recovery was calculated from indentation length (micrometer [μm]) of sound enamel specimen at baseline(B), indentation length (μm) after in vitro demineralization(D1), indentation length (μm) after intra-oral exposure (R): [D1-R/D1-B]*100. |
Time Frame | Baseline to 14 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride. |
Measure Participants | 53 | 52 | 54 | 52 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [% SMHR] |
24.48
(16.088)
|
8.09
(25.892)
|
28.36
(21.037)
|
30.01
(18.203)
|
Title | Enamel Fluoride Uptake |
---|---|
Description | The microdrill enamel biopsy technique was used to analyze the fluoride uptake by enamel. Each enamel specimen was mounted on the long axis of a drill attached to a microdrill and drilled to a depth of approximately 100 micrometer (μm) through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen). The enamel powder pooled from four drilling samples was then immediately analyzed for fluoride content using fluoride specific electrode and pH/ion meter. The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as microgram per square centimeter (μg/cm^2). |
Time Frame | Baseline to 14 days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride. |
Measure Participants | 53 | 52 | 54 | 52 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microgram per square centimeter(μg/cm^2)] |
7.22
(3.016)
|
1.60
(0.670)
|
8.01
(3.925)
|
9.97
(4.962)
|
Title | Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Day 14 |
---|---|
Description | Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 baseline prior to supervised treatment. - at day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Day14 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride. |
Measure Participants | 53 | 51 | 54 | 52 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microgram per mililitre(μg/mL )] |
0.06
(0.317)
|
-0.01
(0.030)
|
0.00
(0.245)
|
0.06
(0.203)
|
Title | Change in Saliva Fluoride Concentration From Baseline (Post-treatment) to Day 14 |
---|---|
Description | Fluoride concentration in saliva was measured after collecting saliva samples at the following time points: - at Day 1 post supervised treatment at site. - at Day 14 post treatment. The amount of fluoride in the samples was calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the volume of the sample and expressed as μg/mL of sample. |
Time Frame | Baseline up to Day 14 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP population included all participants who were randomized into the study, received at least one dose of study product, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment and had no protocol violations deemed to affect efficacy during the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride |
Measure Participants | 53 | 51 | 54 | 52 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [μg/mL] |
13.08
(9.743)
|
0.05
(0.045)
|
8.62
(6.892)
|
13.81
(10.620)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | ||||
Arm/Group Description | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a non-fluoride (placebo) toothpaste | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride | Twice daily brushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing 1150 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride, followed by once daily rinsing (post night time brushing) with a fluoride mouthwash containing 220 ppm of fluoride as sodium fluoride. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
HAEMATEMESIS | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
ASTHMA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
HYPERTENSION | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Placebo Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | Placebo Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/No Rinse | Fluoride Dentifrice/Fluoride Rinse | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 15/60 (25%) | 13/56 (23.2%) | 18/59 (30.5%) | 17/57 (29.8%) | ||||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||||||
EAR PAIN | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Glossodynia | 0/60 (0%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | ||||
Tongue Geographic | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 2/57 (3.5%) | ||||
Dry Mouth | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Dyspepsia | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Haematemesis | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Lip Dry | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Oral Discomfort | 1/60 (1.7%) | 4/56 (7.1%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Paraesthesia Oral | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Tongue Ulceration | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
Cheilitis | 1/60 (1.7%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Diarrhoea | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Gingival Erythema | 2/60 (3.3%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Gingival Hypertrophy | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Gingival Oedema | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Gingival Ulceration | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Lip Ulceration | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
MOUTH HAEMORRHAGE | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
MOUTH ULCERATION | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
ORAL MUCOSAL ERYTHEMA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
TRAUMATIC OCCLUSION | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
General disorders | ||||||||
INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH DEVICE | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 2/59 (3.4%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
CHEST PAIN | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
MEDICAL DEVICE PAIN | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
NASOPHARYNGITIS | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
ORAL HERPES | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
BRONCHITIS | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
SINUSITIS | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||||
MOUTH INJURY | 2/60 (3.3%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
TONGUE INJURY | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
ARTHROPOD BITE | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
ARTHROPOD STING | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
LACERATION | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
POST PROCEDURAL HAEMORRHAGE | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
TRAUMATIC HAEMATOMA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Investigations | ||||||||
SMEAR CERVIX ABNORMAL | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
BACK PAIN | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 3/57 (5.3%) | ||||
ARTHRALGIA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
MYALGIA | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
HEADACHE | 1/60 (1.7%) | 2/56 (3.6%) | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||||
ASTHMA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
THROAT TIGHTNESS | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||||
URTICARIA | 0/60 (0%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | ||||
ERYTHEMA | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
RASH | 1/60 (1.7%) | 0/56 (0%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) | ||||
Vascular disorders | ||||||||
HYPERTENSION | 0/60 (0%) | 1/56 (1.8%) | 0/59 (0%) | 0/57 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | GSK Response Center |
---|---|
Organization | GlaxoSmithKline |
Phone | 866-435-7343 |
- 203160