LaserFissure: Fissure Caries Inhibition Study With Solea CO2-9.3μm Short-pulsed Laser
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate whether the use of the new CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser increases the caries resistance of occlusal pit and fissure surfaces in patients in addition to fluoride therapy. This will be quantified by visual exams with the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II), SOPROLIFE daylight and blue fluorescence, and DIAGNOdent Laser Light-induced Fluorescence. This is a randomized, single blind, prospective, split mouth controlled, clinical trial over 12 months.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study is designed as randomized, single blind, prospective, split mouth controlled, clinical trial over 12 months. The subjects for this study will be recruited from the UCSF School of Dentistry. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria from the UCSF Predoctoral, Postgraduate Pediatric Dental and Postgraduate orthodontic clinics will have the study explained to them and be invited to participate.
Young patients with moderate/high caries risk will be invited to enroll into the study. They will have to have a pair of two molars which have not been treated so far and are caries free and not sealed. The molar on patient's dominant side (right or left) will be randomly assigned to either the test or the control group with the contralateral non-dominant side receiving the other treatment. The test tooth will be treated with CO2 laser irradiation and fluoride varnish; the control tooth will receive fluoride varnish treatment alone.
A baseline visual inspection using ICDAS II, white and blue light digital photographs (SOPROLIFE), and DIAGNOdent assessments will be made by a dentist prior to treatment.
The patient will be asked to return for a 6-month and a 12-month follow up exam, at which time visual inspection with all testing methods will be conducted by the dentist who originally completed the baseline exam. The endpoint of the study for each participant will be when either the control or test tooth is found to have significant demineralization by ICDAS assessment (ICDAS code 3 - "localized enamel breakdown without clinical visual signs of dentinal involvement") or at the 12 month exam, whichever comes first.
The control and test teeth might be sealed with a dental sealant at the end of the study. All data obtained will be analyzed for statistical significance.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Laser & Fluoride In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. |
Device: Laser
CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Fluoride alone In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. |
Other: Fluoride
The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) - Number of Molars With ICDAS Score of 3 or More - ICDAS Score 3, Cavity - [1 year]
Difference in number of lesion changes into ICDAS score 3 (signifying a cavity) between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The ICDAS score ranges from 0 to 6, with score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, score 3 means a first physical loss of enamel, and score 6 means a huge cavity.
- Change in ICDAS Scores - International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) - [1 year]
Differences in change in ICDAS scores between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The ICDAS score ranges from 0 to 6, with the score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, score 3 means a first physical loss of enamel, and score 6 means a huge cavity.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in SOPROlife Scores [1 year]
Differences in change in SOPROlife scores between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 month. The SOPROlife score (name of the intraoral camera system) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The SOPROlife score ranges from 0 to 6, with score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, and score 6 means a huge cavity.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
age 6 or older, in good general health
-
subject is of moderate or high caries risk according to CAMBRA
-
has at least one pair of unsealed molars in at least one jaw with need for a sealant
-
teeth with an ICDAS code 0, 1 and 2 with deep grooves and fissures providing an anatomical stick for an explorer
-
willing to comply with all study procedures and protocols
-
must be able to read and understand English
-
have an understanding of the study
-
residing in San Francisco or other nearby locales with community water fluoridation (to eliminate water fluoridation as a potential confounding variable)
-
patient and parent/guardian able to provide written informed consent in English
-
willing to sign the "Authorization for Release of Personal Health Information and Use of Personally Unidentified Study Data for Research" form; data will only be used for research.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
show evidence of extremely poor oral hygiene
-
subjects suffering from systemic diseases, significant past or medical history with conditions that may affect oral health or oral flora (i.e. diabetes, HIV, heart conditions that require antibiotic prophylaxis),
-
taking medications that may affect the oral flora or salivary flow (e.g. antibiotic use in the past three months, drugs associated with dry mouth / xerostomia [extreme high caries risk])
-
other conditions that may decrease the likelihood of adhering to study protocol
-
subjects who will leave the area and are unable to complete the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UCSF School of Dentistry - Dental Offices in Bay Area | San Francisco | California | United States | 94143 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Rechmann, DDS, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Akarsu S, Köprülü H. In vivo comparison of the efficacy of DIAGNOdent by visual inspection and radiographic diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Clin Dent. 2006;17(3):53-8.
- Al-Khateeb S, Forsberg CM, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Månsson B. A longitudinal laser fluorescence study of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):595-602.
- al-Khateeb S, Oliveby A, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Månsson B. Laser fluorescence quantification of remineralisation in situ of incipient enamel lesions: influence of fluoride supplements. Caries Res. 1997;31(2):132-40.
- al-Khateeb S, ten Cate JM, Angmar-Månsson B, de Josselin de Jong E, Sundström G, Exterkate RA, Oliveby A. Quantification of formation and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions with a new portable fluorescence device. Adv Dent Res. 1997 Nov;11(4):502-6.
- Altenburger MJ, Gmeiner B, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT, Schirrmeister JF. The evaluation of fluorescence changes after application of casein phosphopeptides (CPP) and amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on early carious lesions. Am J Dent. 2010 Aug;23(4):188-92.
- Angnes V, Angnes G, Batisttella M, Grande RH, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Clinical effectiveness of laser fluorescence, visual inspection and radiography in the detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):490-5.
- Astvaldsdóttir A, Holbrook WP, Tranaeus S. Consistency of DIAGNOdent instruments for clinical assessment of fissure caries. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Aug;62(4):193-8.
- Bamzahim M, Aljehani A, Shi XQ. Clinical performance of DIAGnodent in the detection of secondary carious lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Feb;63(1):26-30.
- Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, Hyman J, Jaramillo F, Kingman A, Nowjack-Raymer R, Selwitz RH, Wu T; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis--United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005 Aug 26;54(3):1-43.
- Brown LJ, Kaste LM, Selwitz RH, Furman LJ. Dental caries and sealant usage in U.S. children, 1988-1991: selected findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Mar;127(3):335-43.
- Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Doré CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
- de Josselin de Jong E, Sundström F, Westerling H, Tranaeus S, ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Månsson B. A new method for in vivo quantification of changes in initial enamel caries with laser fluorescence. Caries Res. 1995;29(1):2-7.
- Emami Z, al-Khateeb S, de Josselin de Jong E, Sundström F, Trollsås K, Angmar-Månsson B. Mineral loss in incipient caries lesions quantified with laser fluorescence and longitudinal microradiography. A methodologic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996 Feb;54(1):8-13.
- Featherstone JD, Nelson DG. Laser effects on dental hard tissues. Adv Dent Res. 1987 Oct;1(1):21-6.
- Featherstone JD, Nelson DG. Recent uses of electron microscopy in the study of physico-chemical processes affecting the reactivity of synthetic and biological apatites. Scanning Microsc. 1989 Sep;3(3):815-27; discussion 827-8.
- Featherstone JD. Caries detection and prevention with laser energy. Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Oct;44(4):955-69, ix. Review.
- Ferreira Zandoná AG, Analoui M, Beiswanger BB, Isaacs RL, Kafrawy AH, Eckert GJ, Stookey GK. An in vitro comparison between laser fluorescence and visual examination for detection of demineralization in occlusal pits and fissures. Caries Res. 1998;32(3):210-8.
- Goodis HE, Fried D, Gansky S, Rechmann P, Featherstone JD. Pulpal safety of 9.6 microm TEA CO2 laser used for caries prevention. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):104-10.
- Gorton J, Featherstone JD. In vivo inhibition of demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):10-4.
- Hafström-Björkman U, Sundström F, de Josselin de Jong E, Oliveby A, Angmar-Månsson B. Comparison of laser fluorescence and longitudinal microradiography for quantitative assessment of in vitro enamel caries. Caries Res. 1992;26(4):241-7.
- Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170-8.
- Kantorowitz Z, Featherstone JD, Fried D. Caries prevention by CO2 laser treatment: dependency on the number of pulses used. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 May;129(5):585-91.
- Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;33(4):261-6.
- Lussi A. Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res. 1991;25(4):296-303.
- Pitts NB. How the detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries integrate with personalized caries management. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000224208. Epub 2009 Jun 3. Review.
- Pretty IA, Ellwood RP. Comparison of paired visual assessment and software analyses of changes in caries status over 6 months from fluorescence images. Caries Res. 2007;41(2):115-20.
- Rechmann P, Charland D, Rechmann BM, Featherstone JD. Performance of laser fluorescence devices and visual examination for the detection of occlusal caries in permanent molars. J Biomed Opt. 2012 Mar;17(3):036006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.3.036006.
- Rechmann P, Charland DA, Rechmann BM, Le CQ, Featherstone JD. In-vivo occlusal caries prevention by pulsed CO2 -laser and fluoride varnish treatment--a clinical pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2013 Jul;45(5):302-10. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22141. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- Rechmann P, Fried D, Le CQ, Nelson G, Rapozo-Hilo M, Rechmann BM, Featherstone JD. Caries inhibition in vital teeth using 9.6-μm CO2-laser irradiation. J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):071405. doi: 10.1117/1.3564908.
- Rechmann P, Rechmann BM, Featherstone JD. Caries detection using light-based diagnostic tools. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012 Sep;33(8):582-4, 586, 588-93; quiz 594, 596.
- Reis A, Mendes FM, Angnes V, Angnes G, Grande RH, Loguercio AD. Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions. J Dent. 2006 Feb;34(2):89-96. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
- Rocha RO, Ardenghi TM, Oliveira LB, Rodrigues CR, Ciamponi AL. In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):437-41.
- Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Månsson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surface caries: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001 Apr;59(2):74-8.
- Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Månsson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):151-8.
- Takagi S, Liao H, Chow LC. Effect of tooth-bound fluoride on enamel demineralization/ remineralization in vitro. Caries Res. 2000 Jul-Aug;34(4):281-8.
- Terrer E, Koubi S, Dionne A, Weisrock G, Sarraquigne C, Mazuir A, Tassery H. A new concept in restorative dentistry: light-induced fluorescence evaluator for diagnosis and treatment. Part 1: Diagnosis and treatment of initial occlusal caries. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov 1;10(6):E086-94.
- Terrer E, Raskin A, Koubi S, Dionne A, Weisrock G, Sarraquigne C, Mazuir A, Tassery H. A new concept in restorative dentistry: LIFEDT-light-induced fluorescence evaluator for diagnosis and treatment: part 2 - treatment of dentinal caries. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 Jan 1;11(1):E095-102.
- Tranaeus S, Al-Khateeb S, Björkman S, Twetman S, Angmar-Månsson B. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to monitor incipient lesions in caries-active children. A comparative study of remineralisation by fluoride varnish and professional cleaning. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Apr;109(2):71-5.
- Tranaeus S, Lindgren LE, Karlsson L, Angmar-Månsson B. In vivo validity and reliability of IR fluorescence measurements for caries detection and quantification. Swed Dent J. 2004;28(4):173-82.
- Tranaeus S, Shi XQ, Lindgren LE, Trollsås K, Angmar-Månsson B. In vivo repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative light-induced fluorescence method. Caries Res. 2002 Jan-Feb;36(1):3-9.
- Yin W, Feng Y, Hu D, Ellwood RP, Pretty IA. Reliability of quantitative laser fluorescence analysis of smooth surface lesions adjacent to the gingival tissues. Caries Res. 2007;41(3):186-9.
- Young DA, Featherstone JD. Caries management by risk assessment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):e53-63. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12031.
- Zuerlein MJ, Fried D, Featherstone JD. Modeling the modification depth of carbon dioxide laser-treated dental enamel. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;25(4):335-47.
- LaserFissure-1st
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | This study was performed between February 2018 and November 2019 at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Dentistry. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 60 | 60 |
COMPLETED | 55 | 55 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Overall right or left second molar | 60 | 60 | 120 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
60
100%
|
60
100%
|
120
200%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
13.1
(1.4)
|
13.1
(1.4)
|
13.1
(1.4)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
32
53.3%
|
32
53.3%
|
64
106.7%
|
Male |
28
46.7%
|
28
46.7%
|
56
93.3%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (right or left second molar) [Count of Units] | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Asian |
16
|
16
|
32
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Black or African American |
9
|
9
|
18
|
White |
31
|
31
|
62
|
More than one race |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
4
|
4
|
8
|
Region of Enrollment (right or left second molar) [Number] | |||
United States |
60
|
60
|
120
|
Outcome Measures
Title | International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) - Number of Molars With ICDAS Score of 3 or More - ICDAS Score 3, Cavity - |
---|---|
Description | Difference in number of lesion changes into ICDAS score 3 (signifying a cavity) between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The ICDAS score ranges from 0 to 6, with score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, score 3 means a first physical loss of enamel, and score 6 means a huge cavity. |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. |
Measure Participants | 55 | 55 |
Measure right or left second molar | 55 | 55 |
Count of Units [right or left second molar] |
0
|
13
|
Title | Change in ICDAS Scores - International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) - |
---|---|
Description | Differences in change in ICDAS scores between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The ICDAS score ranges from 0 to 6, with the score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, score 3 means a first physical loss of enamel, and score 6 means a huge cavity. |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. |
Measure Participants | 51 | 51 |
Measure right or left molar | 51 | 51 |
ICDAS score change -1 |
4
|
0
|
ICDAS score change 0 |
34
|
13
|
ICDAS score change +1 |
12
|
28
|
ICDAS score change +2 |
1
|
10
|
Title | Change in SOPROlife Scores |
---|---|
Description | Differences in change in SOPROlife scores between matched case and control teeth (within patient) from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 month. The SOPROlife score (name of the intraoral camera system) is a visual assessment of the caries levels. The SOPROlife score ranges from 0 to 6, with score 0 meaning no demineralization at all, and score 6 means a huge cavity. |
Time Frame | 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. |
Measure Participants | 52 | 51 |
Measure right or left second molar | 52 | 51 |
change -1 |
2
|
0
|
change 0 |
47
|
19
|
change +1 |
1
|
30
|
change +2 |
2
|
2
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data were collected from enrollment through one year follow up. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone | ||
Arm/Group Description | In the split mouth design the molar on one side of the mouth receives the intervention CO2 9.3 μm short pulsed laser treatment and fluoride varnish (experimental side) in the occlusal fissure areas. Laser: CO2 - 9.3μm short-pulsed laser irradiation will occur on the occlusal enamel surface. This results in changes in crystal composition and structure, which increase the resistance of dental mineral to dissolution by acid and will work to better prevent dental caries in the occlusal surface of vital teeth when compared to fluoride therapy alone over 12 months. | In the split mouth design this arm (this side in the mouth - the contralateral tooth to the experimental site in the same jaw) will receive only fluoride varnish treatment. In the split mouth design this opposite side of the jaw is functioning as control. Fluoride: The Fluoride varnish is painted on the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fluoride varnish makes enamel more acid resistant. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Laser & Fluoride | Fluoride Alone | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Peter Rechmann |
---|---|
Organization | University of California at San Francisco |
Phone | 415 514 3225 |
Peter.Rechmann@ucsf.edu |
- LaserFissure-1st