Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment

Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03186950
Collaborator
(none)
91
1
2
36.3
2.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The pulp therapy in primary teeth is designed to eliminate the infection and keep the tooth in a functional state until its natural exfoliation. An important step for the success of endodontic therapy is the final restoration, which must seal the tooth, avoiding new contamination. Thus, this study proposes to carry out a randomized clinical trial with longitudinal follow-up of two years, in order to compare the degree of success of endodontic treatment in primary teeth restored with two different techniques: composite resin (Filtek Bulk Fill - 3M ESPE) or stainless steel crowns (3M ESPE). Success will be measured by clinical and radiographic features of primary teeth treated with the different restorations after 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Among the secondary outcomes that will be assessed are the quality and durability of restorations and the cost benefit of treatments. Patients who seek the university clinics and require endodontic treatment will be invited to participate. The sample unit is the tooth and these will be randomized in groups through a randomization list created and distributed in sequential opaque envelopes. The envelope will be opened only after the end of endodontic treatment, to ensure allocation concealment. The data will be statistically analyzed using the Stata 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The longevity of the treatments will be evaluated by estimating survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival rates according to the type of endodontic proposed treatment will be analyzed using the log-rank test. All other clinical variables will be analized using Cox regression. The significance level for all analyzes will be 5%.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Restoration with Stainless Steel Crowns
  • Procedure: Restoration using BulkFill CR
N/A

Detailed Description

The pulp therapy in primary teeth is designed to eliminate the infection and keep the tooth in a functional state until its natural exfoliation. An important step for the success of endodontic therapy is the final restoration, which must seal the tooth, avoiding new contamination. Thus, this study proposes to carry out a randomized clinical trial with longitudinal follow-up of two years, in order to compare the degree of success of endodontic treatment in primary teeth restored with two different techniques: composite resin (Filtek Bulk Fill - 3M ESPE) or stainless steel crowns (3M ESPE). Success will be measured by clinical and radiographic features of primary teeth treated with the different restorations after 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Among the secondary outcomes that will be assessed are the quality and durability of restorations and the cost benefit of treatments. Patients who seek the university clinics and require endodontic treatment will be invited to participate. The sample unit is the tooth and these will be randomized in groups through a randomization list created and distributed in sequential opaque envelopes. The envelope will be opened only after the end of endodontic treatment (made with Guedes-Pinto paste), to ensure allocation concealment. The data will be statistically analyzed using the Stata 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The longevity of the treatments will be evaluated by estimating survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival rates according to the type of endodontic proposed treatment will be analyzed using the log-rank test. All other clinical variables will be analized using Cox regression. The significance level for all analyzes will be 5%.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
91 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment: Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 10, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Restoration with Stainless Steel Crowns

Restoration of the tooth after endodontic treatment using stainless steel crown.

Procedure: Restoration with Stainless Steel Crowns
After finishing the endodontic treatment with Guedes-Pinto Paste, the restoration of the teeth will be made using Stainless Steel Crowns.

Experimental: Restoration using BulkFill CR

Restoration of the tooth after endodontic treatment using bulkfill composite resin

Procedure: Restoration using BulkFill CR
After finishing the endodontic treatment with Guedes-Pinto Paste, the restoration of the teeth will be made using BulkFill composite resin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Endodontic Treatment survival [12 months]

    The primary outcome will be the success or failure of endodontic treatments evaluated through the tooth permanence in the arcade on clinical and radiographic conditions of normality compared between groups restorations (steel crown or composite). The clinical criteria to determine success are: absence of fistula, absence of painful symptoms, absence of pathological mobility and adequate gingival contour. Radiographically, the success criteria are: absence / reduction of rarefaction and absence / bone thinning in the furcation region later, maintenance of periradicular space, root resorption compatible with eruptive phase and absence of pathological resorption

  2. Need for new intervention [12 months]

    It will be assess the need for any type of reintervention, both for the steel crown group and for the composite resin. Thus, our primary outcome will be measured in accordance with the evaluation of restorations, not only by the failure or not endodontic treatment. Clinical sucess: no fistulae or abscess Radiographic sucess: Reduction or maintenance of the interradicular lesion; No crypt breakup

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Cost-efficacy between the groups [baseline, 1, 6, 12 and 24 months]

    The cost effectiveness of the restoration will be evaluated through consultation that will be timed and cost form developed for the study.

  2. Acceptance of the treatments [Baseline]

    Evaluate the acceptance of the treatments by the patients and their guardians, using a questionnaire.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
3 Years to 7 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Remaining tooth structure and location of the lesion allow rehabilitation

  • Do not have internal or external resorption involving more than 1/3 the length of the root

  • Do not have bone loss in lateral root or crypt disruption

  • With the presence of at least half of the root

Exclusion Criteria:
  • patients that do not fit the inclusion criteria

  • patients whos parents did not sign the assentiment term

  • patients with systemic desease

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of São Paulo - School of Dentistry São Paulo Brazil 05508-000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Sao Paulo

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniela P Raggio, Professor, University of Sao Paulo

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Daniela Prócida Raggio, Professor, University of Sao Paulo
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03186950
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ENDOREST
First Posted:
Jun 14, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Apr 7, 2020
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 7, 2020