Comparing Between XP Endo Finisher and Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparing the postoperative flare ups and pain after adding the XP Endo Finisher to the final irrigation protocol on necrotic mandibular premolars.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
patients are randomized into 2 groups after meeting the eligibility criteria,
-
Each patient will be given pain scale chart in order to record his /her pain level before any intervention.
-
The tooth is anesthetized, accessed and mechanical instrumentation to be made 3 A) For the experimental group: The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation
B) For the control group :
The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.
- Obturation is done and postoperative instructions are given to the patient
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: XP Endo Finisher
|
Procedure: XP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol
The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation
|
Active Comparator: Conventional needle irrigation
|
Procedure: Conventional needle irrigation only
The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Post-operative pain recorded by the patient using a four step pain scale (0-3) [up to 5 days after the treatment]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Post-operative swelling [up to 5 days after the treatment]
- Need\ number of Analgesic tablets [up to 5 days after the treatment]
- Need for systemic antibiotics [up to 5 days after the treatment]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18-50 years old. ii. Males or Females. iii. mandibular Premolars
-
Asymptomatic.
-
Non-vital response of pulp tissue (negative response).
-
With or without periapical radiolucency.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients allergic to penicillin. ii. Pregnant females. iii. Patients having significant systemic disorder. iv. If antibiotics have been administrated during the past two weeks preoperatively.
-
Patients having bruxism or clenching. vi. Teeth that have :
-
Vital pulp tissues.
-
Association with swelling
-
Acute peri-apical abscess
-
Periodontally affected teeth
-
No possible restorability
-
Previous endodontic treatment.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Cairo University
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8. Epub 2016 May 20.
- Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003 Jul;36(7):453-63. Review.
- XP and Protaper next