Two Preventive Measures on Caries Progression in Mixed Dentition Patients.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Primary Objective:
Assessing the clinical effect of SDF and Laser on the prevention of initial caries progression with and without pits and fissure sealants in both permanent and primary molars.
Secondary Objective:
Effect of SDF and Laser Application on the subsequently applied pits and fissure sealants.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Primary Objective:
Assessing the clinical effect of SDF and Laser on the prevention of initial caries progression with and without pits and fissure sealants in both permanent and primary molars.
Scoring caried out by ICDAS Scoring criteria over a 1 year follow up period
Secondary Objective:
Effect of SDF and Laser Application on the subsequently applied pits and fissure sealants.
Measured by Simonson's criteria over 1 year follow up period.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group A Diode laser application only |
Device: Diode Laser
Irradiating Enamel by Diode laser
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Group B SDF application only |
Drug: SDF1
Topical SDF application
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Group C Diode laser application followed by pits and fissure sealant. |
Device: Diode Laser
Irradiating Enamel by Diode laser
Other Names:
Drug: Pit Fissure Sealant
Sealing occlusal pits and fissures
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Group D SDF application followed by pits and fissure sealant. |
Drug: SDF1
Topical SDF application
Other Names:
Drug: Pit Fissure Sealant
Sealing occlusal pits and fissures
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of molars with arrested initial decay [1 year follow up]
ICDAS II Score system
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of molars with completely retained f pits and fissure sealants [1 year follow up]
Simonsen's Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
.Children aged 6-9 years old.
.Patients categorized as moderate to high caries risk (deft index >1) showing more than 1 new carious lesions or restorations in the last 36 months according to "ADA Caries Risk Assessment Form (Age >6)" .A split mouth study design was followed where all four second molars were selected for intervention in the primary molar group, while all first molars were selected for intervention in the permanent molar group.
.The four molars selected in each patient (primary / permanent) should be fully erupted with no gingival overhangs /operculum and with no history of previous restorations or prior sealants.
.According to International Caries Detection and Assessment System ICDAS grading, molars with (0, 1, 2) scores only were included.
Exclusion Criteria:
.Uncooperative or mentally challenged patients, with bad oral hygiene or rampant caries.
.Patients providing history of bruxism or clenching affecting the posterior occlusion were excluded.
.Children with known allergies or sensitivities to resins or silver products. .Molars that showed well-coalesced, self-cleansing pits & fissures or shallow grooves and severe forms of hypoplasia / fluorosis were excluded.
.Patients & parents with high esthetic demands and concerns. .Unmotivated patients, or parents who refused to sign the consent form.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Faculty of Dentistry British University | Cairo | Egypt |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- British University In Egypt
Investigators
- Study Director: Noha Kabil, Professor, Head of Department
- Study Director: Basma Gamal, Lecturer, Faculty Council Member
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- PED 20-3D