Clinical Comparison of RPDs Retained by Conical and Galvanoformed Double Crowns.
Sponsor
Heidelberg University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00176215
Collaborator
(none)
2
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to investigate the clinical performance and complication rate of RPDs (Removable partial dentures) retained on conventional conical double crowns in comparison to galvanoformed telscopic double crowns. Additionally the OHIP (Oral Health related Qualitiy of Life)and the abrasion of the teeth were investigated.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Study Type:
Interventional
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date
:
May 1, 2003
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years
and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for RPDs retained by double crowns; 2 to 6 Abutment teeth;
Exclusion Criteria:
- limited contractual capability and absence of consent of the patient
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 69120 |
| 2 | University of Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden_Württemberg | Germany | 69120 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Heidelberg University
Investigators
- Study Chair: Christiane Grossmann, DDS, Heidelberg University
- Principal Investigator: Franziska Lehmann, DDS, Heidelberg University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.Responsible Party:
,
,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00176215
Other Study ID Numbers:
- CG-FL-1
First Posted:
Sep 15, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Sep 15, 2005
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2005
Additional relevant MeSH terms: