TES: The Safety and Efficacy of Nexalin Trans-cranial Electrical Stimulation Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether Nexalin Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) is an effective treatment for depression among patients who are candidates for ECT. A secondary aim to assess whether Nexalin can be used as an alternative to ECT. Although Nexalin has been approved for use in the US, using Nexalin to treat depression in this way is investigational and experimental. If Nexalin is found to be an alternative to ECT, it could offer a safer treatment for depression with less side-effects and a lower cost.
!!! NOTE !!! Post Script / Post Study. The ECT arm (profiling subjects as ECT accepters vs. rejecters) was dropped owing to site objections by referring clinicians. Accordingly, the study was framed as a simple comparison between TES and SHAM TES.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A 2x2 factor Randomized Controlled Trial with block randomization. Inpatient subjects at the Carrier Clinic who are referred for ECT will be recruited, typed regarding their acceptance of ECT, and randomized to either treatment with TES or to a Sham condition. Treatment non-responders in either condition will continue as in patients at the Carrier Clinic until they reach acceptable levels of functioning to be discharged.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Accept ECT - TES Accept ECT where subject is randomized to TES |
Device: Nexalin Based Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation
The Nexalin device, FDA clearance (501K=K024377, Classification: Stimulator, Cranial Electrotherapy: CFR 882. 5800: U.S. Patent #6904322B2), produces a square waveform that provides trans-cranial electrical stimulation to the brain delivered at a frequency of 77.5 Hz at 0 to 4 mA peak current.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Accept ECT - SHAM Accept ECT where subject is randomized to a SHAM condition |
Device: Nexalin Based Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation
The Nexalin device, FDA clearance (501K=K024377, Classification: Stimulator, Cranial Electrotherapy: CFR 882. 5800: U.S. Patent #6904322B2), produces a square waveform that provides trans-cranial electrical stimulation to the brain delivered at a frequency of 77.5 Hz at 0 to 4 mA peak current.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Reject ECT - TES Reject ECT where subject is randomized to TES |
Device: Nexalin Based Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation
The Nexalin device, FDA clearance (501K=K024377, Classification: Stimulator, Cranial Electrotherapy: CFR 882. 5800: U.S. Patent #6904322B2), produces a square waveform that provides trans-cranial electrical stimulation to the brain delivered at a frequency of 77.5 Hz at 0 to 4 mA peak current.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Reject ECT - SHAM Reject ECT where subject is randomized to SHAM |
Device: Nexalin Based Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation
The Nexalin device, FDA clearance (501K=K024377, Classification: Stimulator, Cranial Electrotherapy: CFR 882. 5800: U.S. Patent #6904322B2), produces a square waveform that provides trans-cranial electrical stimulation to the brain delivered at a frequency of 77.5 Hz at 0 to 4 mA peak current.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Treatment Response [1-2 weeks]
Percent responders to TES treatment and Sham TES (50% reduction or a score below 10 on the PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9 item scale, where each item ranges from 0 to 3. Zero represents "not at all" and 3 represents "nearly every day". The scale ranges from 0-27. We used percent change (from admission to "ex-take") as a our metric.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
In-patients at the Carrier Clinic
-
Adults over age 18 and under age 65
-
Able to speak, read and write fluently in English, assessed by the study coordinator at Carrier Clinic
-
Screened Negative for alcohol abuse and/or dependence
-
Able to provide informed consent, assessed by the study coordinator at Carrier Clinic
-
Referred for ECT
-
Not currently taking hypnotics or be prescribed hypnotics during the Nexalin trial
-
Not pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the study
-
Committed to completion of the study
Exclusion Criteria: Medically or psychiatrically unstable, where the severity of the illness prohibits the subject from engaging in study procedures.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carrier Clinic | Belle Mead | New Jersey | United States | 08502 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Pennsylvania
- Carrier Clinic
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael L Perlis, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmöller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Flöel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19. Review.
- Bestmann S, Walsh V. Transcranial electrical stimulation. Curr Biol. 2017 Dec 4;27(23):R1258-R1262. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.001.
- Yavari F, Jamil A, Mosayebi Samani M, Vidor LP, Nitsche MA. Basic and functional effects of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)-An introduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Feb;85:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Review.
- IRB 824349
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (Active) | TES SHAM |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All subjects get active treatment with Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | All subjects get SHAM treatment with TES |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 50 | 51 |
COMPLETED | 38 | 40 |
NOT COMPLETED | 12 | 11 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | SHAM -TES | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES). Active Treatment. | Sham/placebo condition | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 50 | 51 | 101 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
50
100%
|
51
100%
|
101
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
32.6
(2.4)
|
35.9
(2.3)
|
34.2
(2.35)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
20
40%
|
20
39.2%
|
40
39.6%
|
Male |
30
60%
|
31
60.8%
|
61
60.4%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||
White |
35
70%
|
32
62.7%
|
67
66.3%
|
African American |
3
6%
|
0
0%
|
3
3%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
1
2%
|
1
1%
|
Native American |
0
0%
|
1
2%
|
1
1%
|
Multi-Racial |
0
0%
|
2
3.9%
|
2
2%
|
Hispanic |
4
8%
|
5
9.8%
|
9
8.9%
|
Unknown |
8
16%
|
10
19.6%
|
18
17.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
50
100%
|
51
100%
|
101
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Treatment Response |
---|---|
Description | Percent responders to TES treatment and Sham TES (50% reduction or a score below 10 on the PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9 item scale, where each item ranges from 0 to 3. Zero represents "not at all" and 3 represents "nearly every day". The scale ranges from 0-27. We used percent change (from admission to "ex-take") as a our metric. |
Time Frame | 1-2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
101 were enrolled. 78 subjects were in study for the minimum time / minimum number of treatments and provided the full compliment of data. |
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | TES-SHAM |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (Active Tx) | SHAM treatment (no current). Otherwise procedures identical. |
Measure Participants | 38 | 40 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
28
56%
|
29
56.9%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | SHAM-TES | ||
Arm/Group Description | TES = Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (active treatment) | TES. No current. Procedures were otherwise identical between conditions | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | SHAM-TES | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/50 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | SHAM-TES | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/50 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation | SHAM-TES | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/50 (0%) | 0/51 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Michael Perlis |
---|---|
Organization | University of Pennsylvania |
Phone | 215-746-3577 |
mperlis@upenn.edu |
- IRB 824349