Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEER Interactive Versus Treatment as Usual in Subjects With a Primary Diagnosis of Depression

Sponsor
MYnd Analytics (Industry)
Overall Status
Suspended
CT.gov ID
NCT01794559
Collaborator
(none)
1,922
2
2
112
961
8.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of PEER Interactive to inform treatment in subjects with a primary diagnosis of depression with comorbidity of non-psychotic behavioral disorders versus treatment as usual, as determined by the investigator. The primary measurement for improvement of the subjects depression will be a self-evaluation questionnaire, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16, but the investigators will also collect information on their clinical global improvement and any reduction in adverse events.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: PEER Interactive Report
N/A

Detailed Description

This study is prospective in nature. Subjects in the control group will be treated according to treatment as usual and best judgment of the treating physician. For the experimental group the treating physician will follow the guidance of the subject's PEER Interactive Report as regards sensitivity to on-label medications and classes of medication.

The subjects will be washed out of all current medications prior to having an EEG, which is necessary to generate the PEER Interactive Report. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days.

The subjects will be followed for 6 months after the initial treatment, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health. The subjects will also be closely evaluated to determine if they are experiencing any psychiatric specific adverse events. The investigator is allowed to treat the patient according to their best medical judgment, which may include adding or changing medications, seeing the patient more frequently, or other interventions such as the use of sleep aids.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1922 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This study is prospective in nature. Control group subjects will be treated according to treatment as usual. Experimental group physicians will follow the guidance of the subject's PEER Interactive Report. Subjects will be washed out of medications prior to EEG. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days. Subjects will be followed for 6 months after baseline, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). Subjects will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health. Subjects will be closely evaluated for any psychiatric specific adverse events. The investigator is allowed to treat the patient according to best medical judgment, which may include adding or changing medications, seeing the patient more frequently, or other interventions such as the use of sleep aids.This study is prospective in nature. Control group subjects will be treated according to treatment as usual. Experimental group physicians will follow the guidance of the subject's PEER Interactive Report. Subjects will be washed out of medications prior to EEG. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days. Subjects will be followed for 6 months after baseline, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). Subjects will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health. Subjects will be closely evaluated for any psychiatric specific adverse events. The investigator is allowed to treat the patient according to best medical judgment, which may include adding or changing medications, seeing the patient more frequently, or other interventions such as the use of sleep aids.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The subject is masked as to assignment to Control or Treatment Group. The blinded subject acts as the blinded rater in providing the primary outcome measure of the QIDS-SR16
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Utility, Safety, and Efficacy of Using PEER Interactive to Inform the Prescription of Medications to Patients With a Primary Diagnosis of a Depressive Disorder Versus Treatment as Usual.
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Informed by PEER Interactive Report

The PEER Interactive Report -This study is prospective in nature. For subjects in the experimental group, the treating physician will follow the guidance of the subject's PEER Interactive Report as regards sensitivity to on-label medications and classes of medication. The subjects will be washed out of all current medications prior to having an EEG, which is necessary to generate the PEER Interactive Report. The wash out period for outpatients is no longer than 14 days. The subjects will be followed for 6 months after the initial treatment, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health.

Device: PEER Interactive Report
The PEER Interactive Report provides information comparing the subject's Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) to a database of outcomes from patients with similar QEEG results, and how they responded to on-label treatments. This report provides a probability of how this subject will respond to treatment based upon a comparison of similar subjects in the database.

No Intervention: No Report

This study is prospective in nature. Subjects in the control group will be treated according to treatment as usual and best judgment of the treating physician. PEER Interactive Report is not provided to the investigator. The subjects will be followed for 6 months after the initial treatment, or until the patient has achieved maximum medical improvement (MMI). The patient will be seen on a routine basis and assessments will be made at each interaction to evaluate the patient's improvement in mental health.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Reported 16 (QIDS-SR16) [6 months]

    A 16 question self administer survey on the status of the subject's depression. The measurement will be taken until the completion of the study (6 months)or until the subject achieves maximum medical improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) [6 months]

    A CGI for Improvement (CGI-I) and a CGI of Severity (CGI-S) will be measured at each visit during the study or until the subject reaches maximum medical improvement

  2. Concise Health Risk Tracking (CHRT-7SR) [6 months]

    Self reported survey on suicidality will be conducted at each visit until the completion of the study or until the subject reaches maximum medical improvement.

  3. Post traumatic stress disorder checklist - civilian [6 months]

    A 17 question self-reported measure of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV symptoms of PTSD.

  4. Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI) [6 months]

    At what point in time, if ever, does the subject reach their maximum medical improvement.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Subjects with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability [6 months]

    Noting the frequency and severity of psychiatric specific adverse events to determine if the information provided in the PEER Interactive Report results in providing treatment that was better tolerated than treatment as usual.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Must speak and read English

  • Must be able to provide written informed consent

  • A primary diagnosis of a DSM-IV depressive disorder

  • Co-morbidities of non-psychotic behavioral disorders, including PTSD and mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) are eligible to participate.

  • Able to stop all medications (wash out) for 5 half-lves of all medication(s) which affect the EEG. Outpatient subjects are eligible if they can be washed out of their medications in 14 days or less.

  • Ability to comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder

  • History of, or current, open head trauma

  • Subjects who would not be good candidates to be washed out of their medications, in the opinion of the investigator.

  • History of craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident, current diagnosis of seizure disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features, or use of depot neuroleptics in the last 12 months.

  • Clinically significant medical illness, including thyroid disorders.

  • Participation in any other therapeutic drug study within 60 days preceding inclusion in the study.

  • Know pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during the study.

  • Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription medication(s).

  • Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG

  • Candidates that are currently stable and considered to be at maximum medical improvement on current medications.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda Maryland United States 20889
2 Fort Belvoir Community Hospital Fort Belvoir Virginia United States 22060

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • MYnd Analytics

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Iosifescu, MD, PhD, Langone Center, NYU
  • Study Director: Michael Metzig, BA, MYnd Analytics, Inc.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
MYnd Analytics
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01794559
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CNSR011
First Posted:
Feb 20, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jul 31, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by MYnd Analytics
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 31, 2020