Psilodep-RCT: Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparative Mechanisms

Sponsor
Imperial College London (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03429075
Collaborator
Alexander Mosely Charitable Trust (Other)
59
1
2
20.8
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomised double-blind clinical trial. The aim is to compare the efficacy and mechanisms of action of psilocybin, the primary psychoactive substance in 'magic mushrooms', with the SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Psilocybin + Placebo
  • Drug: Psilocybin + Escitalopram
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
59 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparative Mechanisms
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 7, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 17, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Psilocybin

Patients receive Psilocybin

Drug: Psilocybin + Placebo
Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily placebo

Active Comparator: Escitalopram

Patients receive Escitalopram

Drug: Psilocybin + Escitalopram
Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily escitalopram

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [Baseline measure vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing]

    Change in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal during fMRI in response to emotional faces during an emotional faces paradigm done inside the fMRI scanner.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) [Baseline vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing]

    Change in QIDS-SR16 (self-rated measure of depressive symptoms). Scale is composed of 16 items that correlate with the 9 DSM-IV symptom criteria for depression. Each response is graded 0-4 (none-severe symptoms). Questions 1-4 concern sleep disturbances, Question 5 addresses sad mood, Questions 6-9 appetite/weight, Question 10 concentration, Question 11 self-criticism, Question 12 suicidal ideation, Question 13 interest, Q14 energy/fatigue and Questions 15-16 psychomotor agitation/retardation. All questions that address the same topic are grouped and only the highest score from each group is summed up together with the other questions in order to produce a total score. Scores can range from 0-27 and depression severity is graded based on the total score in the following way: 1-5 = No depression 6-10 = Mild depression 11-15 = Moderate depression 16-20 = Severe depression 21-27 = Very severe depression

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Major depressive disorder (DSM-IV)

  2. Depression of moderate to severe degree (17+ on the 21-item HAM-D).

  3. No MRI contraindications

  4. No SSRI contraindications

  5. Has a GP (general practitioner) or other mental healthcare professional who can confirm diagnosis

  6. 18-80 years of age

  7. Males and females

  8. Sufficiently competent with English language

Key exclusion criteria:
  1. Current or previously diagnosed psychotic disorder

  2. Immediate family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder

  3. Medically significant condition rendering unsuitability for the study (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy, severe cardiovascular disease, hepatic or renal failure e.g. CLRC < 30 ml/min etc.)

  4. History of serious suicide attempts requiring hospitalisation.

  5. Significant history of mania (determined by study psychiatrist and medical records)

  6. Psychiatric condition judged to be incompatible with establishment of rapport with therapy team and/or safe exposure to psilocybin, e.g. borderline personality disorder

  7. Blood or needle phobia

  8. Positive pregnancy test at screening or during the study, women who are planning a pregnancy and/or women who are nursing/breastfeeding.

  9. Participants who do not agree to use an acceptable contraceptive method throughout their participation in study.

  10. Current drug or alcohol dependence

  11. No email access

  12. Use of contraindicated medication

  13. Patients presenting with abnormal QT interval prolongation at screening or with a history of this (QTc at screening above 440ms for men and above 470ms for women)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Imperial College Hammersmith campus London United Kingdom W12 0NN

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Imperial College London
  • Alexander Mosely Charitable Trust

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David J Nutt, Medicine, Imperial College London

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Imperial College London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03429075
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 17HH3790
  • 2017-000219-18
First Posted:
Feb 12, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jul 31, 2020
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Imperial College London
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 31, 2020